You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
10 months ago0 points(+0/-0)2 children
>That's an implied list.
Which means it's "conjecture" which is literally the first thing I fucking said. And it's conjecture it even involved child porn in the first place. He was a socialite and knew tons of people. It literally could just be him memorizing and knowing lurid details of people's normal scandalous behaviors - "Remember that time you did a line of coke off that stripper's ass? Sure would be devastating to your mayoral campaign..."
Like you literally think that list of phone contacts was "the list". There's hundreds of names, practically everyone who is anyone is in there.
I know you're a fucking lunatic so it probably doesn't make sense to you, but sexual attraction to children isn't *so* prevalent that "magically" every single person (literally 100% of them, as you seem to think) who has any influence or power also is in to that shit.
Why is it that Randy Andy was the *only* one these victims mentioned?
---
Oh remember how you said "why weren't the victims sued for naming names"? Virginia Guillifre was sued by Dershowitz, lost, and then admitted she made it up. So basically what you stated didn't happen, actually happened.
>The list is implied by Epstein himself for fuck's sake.
According to the jew York Times and one single openly gay reporter who claims he spent money and time to go out of his way for a story, yet he "magically" sat on it for an entire year for no reason, until mere days after Epstein's death when he published it, just in time for nobody to be alive to refute that such an interview ever even happened?
Aren't conspiracy theorists supposed to be super-ultra-megaminds who notice strange coincidences like that?
Have you never in your life ever once considered that shit like "the Epstein list" is intentionally seeded into retarded right-wingers to drive them insane? Kind of like what was experimented with in MKULTRA and Operation Mockingbird?
Pretty sure that's exactly what I implied when I asked how nobody noticed that somehow this guy had this information for an entire year but decided to just not run his own story.
The simplest explanation is that he made that shit up, which is routine for the NYT to do.
Besides, the one conspiracy theory I've ever maintained is that they're invented by the government to keep right-wingers so busy tied up in retarded insanity that they become so paranoid that they render themselves harmless, driven so out of their minds that they cloister themselves in to online spaces where they just shout in to the void at the audience of "nobody" who cares.
The main difference from my conspiracy theory and all the others is that mine is the only one that actually would change how the right behaves into something effective. Forget all the fucking delusional stories that you'll never ever see 'justice' for and actually do something useful.
Whereas "your" conspiracy theories continue the cycle of somehow expecting any given conspiracy theory to actually 'pay off', even though they never do, and waiting for that pay off for decades.
There's still people squinting at pixels crying about 9/11, as if it matters anymore. It doesn't. Larry Silverstein? Do you think you'll ever 'get' him? You won't. So admit you won't and don't even bother talking about it, it's a waste of your time.
Remember what I said earlier about HAARP? That was completely fabricated, you can pull that thread yourself, and you'll see it was literally sci-fi 'clickbait' for some guy to sell books.
How many people have you ever seen pointing out how there actually is no source whatsoever for where 'HAARP is weather control' ever came from? You never have, because that's part of the paranoid psyop.
---
Dude, think about it.
Governments might want to neutralize perceived threats by sowing confusion and distrust inside those communities instead of engaging them directly. Over time, constant exposure to false but emotionally charged "theories" could heighten anxiety, paranoia, and alienation, making political organizing difficult or chaotic. By flooding the information environment with competing, false conspiracies, the government could make it nearly impossible to discern truth from fiction, causing apathy or extreme skepticism.
...
That literally fucking describes the current state of the entire right.
10 months ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
>Oh remember how you said "why weren't the victims sued for naming names"? Virginia Guillifre was sued by Dershowitz, lost, and then admitted she made it up. So basically what you stated didn't happen, actually happened. I expect you to ignore that though.
Virginia Guillifre committed suicide not long after. Nothing suspicious about that at all, sure.
Which means it's "conjecture" which is literally the first thing I fucking said. And it's conjecture it even involved child porn in the first place. He was a socialite and knew tons of people. It literally could just be him memorizing and knowing lurid details of people's normal scandalous behaviors - "Remember that time you did a line of coke off that stripper's ass? Sure would be devastating to your mayoral campaign..."
Like you literally think that list of phone contacts was "the list". There's hundreds of names, practically everyone who is anyone is in there.
I know you're a fucking lunatic so it probably doesn't make sense to you, but sexual attraction to children isn't *so* prevalent that "magically" every single person (literally 100% of them, as you seem to think) who has any influence or power also is in to that shit.
Why is it that Randy Andy was the *only* one these victims mentioned?
---
Oh remember how you said "why weren't the victims sued for naming names"? Virginia Guillifre was sued by Dershowitz, lost, and then admitted she made it up. So basically what you stated didn't happen, actually happened.
I expect you to ignore that though.
You said the entire thing was hallucinated by 4chan and there was absolutely nothing to it.
According to the jew York Times and one single openly gay reporter who claims he spent money and time to go out of his way for a story, yet he "magically" sat on it for an entire year for no reason, until mere days after Epstein's death when he published it, just in time for nobody to be alive to refute that such an interview ever even happened?
Aren't conspiracy theorists supposed to be super-ultra-megaminds who notice strange coincidences like that?
Have you never in your life ever once considered that shit like "the Epstein list" is intentionally seeded into retarded right-wingers to drive them insane? Kind of like what was experimented with in MKULTRA and Operation Mockingbird?
Pretty sure that's exactly what I implied when I asked how nobody noticed that somehow this guy had this information for an entire year but decided to just not run his own story.
The simplest explanation is that he made that shit up, which is routine for the NYT to do.
Besides, the one conspiracy theory I've ever maintained is that they're invented by the government to keep right-wingers so busy tied up in retarded insanity that they become so paranoid that they render themselves harmless, driven so out of their minds that they cloister themselves in to online spaces where they just shout in to the void at the audience of "nobody" who cares.
The main difference from my conspiracy theory and all the others is that mine is the only one that actually would change how the right behaves into something effective. Forget all the fucking delusional stories that you'll never ever see 'justice' for and actually do something useful.
Whereas "your" conspiracy theories continue the cycle of somehow expecting any given conspiracy theory to actually 'pay off', even though they never do, and waiting for that pay off for decades.
There's still people squinting at pixels crying about 9/11, as if it matters anymore. It doesn't. Larry Silverstein? Do you think you'll ever 'get' him? You won't. So admit you won't and don't even bother talking about it, it's a waste of your time.
Remember what I said earlier about HAARP? That was completely fabricated, you can pull that thread yourself, and you'll see it was literally sci-fi 'clickbait' for some guy to sell books.
How many people have you ever seen pointing out how there actually is no source whatsoever for where 'HAARP is weather control' ever came from? You never have, because that's part of the paranoid psyop.
---
Dude, think about it.
Governments might want to neutralize perceived threats by sowing confusion and distrust inside those communities instead of engaging them directly. Over time, constant exposure to false but emotionally charged "theories" could heighten anxiety, paranoia, and alienation, making political organizing difficult or chaotic. By flooding the information environment with competing, false conspiracies, the government could make it nearly impossible to discern truth from fiction, causing apathy or extreme skepticism.
...
That literally fucking describes the current state of the entire right.
Virginia Guillifre committed suicide not long after. Nothing suspicious about that at all, sure.
You don't think it's really weird that all these victims out there seem to allergic to naming names themselves, besides Prince Andrew?