Honest Libertarian
(media.scored.co)
Libertarianism is like communism but somehow even more wimpy.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
35 comments:
how? maybe they're jewish (marx/luxemburg/rand) but the core values are pretty opposite
I don't mean specific values, but rather that it's pure idealism over practicality. Communists at least try to win, though it involves abandoning their idealism and diluting themselves. Libertarians, on the other hand, would rather get murdered by third world migrants than fight for their survival if it meant doing something "statist" like close the fucking border and have protectionist economic policies.
Every day I find less distinction between libertarianism and anarchy. Kinda like atheism and nihilism. Atheists will tell you they aren't nihilists, but without anything beyond the physically-observable world... what's the point?
If the libertarian opposes all state authority... who's even going to enforce the "I don't consent" rule when someone wants to take from you? Your privately-owned security? Congratulations, you're an oligarch/aristocrat and not a libertarian. No one? Congratulations, you're an anarchist.
If the libertarian opposes all state authority... who's even going to enforce the "I don't consent" rule when someone wants to take from you? Your privately-owned security? Congratulations, you're an oligarch/aristocrat and not a libertarian. No one? Congratulations, you're an anarchist.
Thats not libertarianism. That's libertinism and it is Jewish and it is anarcho communist
Libertarianism is pretty Jewish
libertarians are are liberals with even more reality-denying ideals than communists. they stink of autism and hatred of human nature, how the world works.
And yet if you know anything about Libertarian Party infighting, drama, mises revolt etc you know no one belives that...
Groups of libertarians who each member morally self-polices are stable.
Groups of libertarians where one member does not morally self-police will collapse.
Groups of libertarians where one member does not morally self-police will collapse.
I think it's a mistake to group all libertarians together like they're the same, any more than you'd group leftists and rightists together because they may all want big governments...
there are left libertarians (probably the twitter account) and right-wing "conservatarians"
granted, depending on how you take it, the statement isn't necessarily wrong... winning without principles can be a losing long term strategy if there are no principles backing it
that all said, a lot of the conservatarians were absorbed into the MAGA movement in some capacity in the mid 2010s, leaving "libertarianism" as more of a left-wing movement, maybe
there are left libertarians (probably the twitter account) and right-wing "conservatarians"
granted, depending on how you take it, the statement isn't necessarily wrong... winning without principles can be a losing long term strategy if there are no principles backing it
that all said, a lot of the conservatarians were absorbed into the MAGA movement in some capacity in the mid 2010s, leaving "libertarianism" as more of a left-wing movement, maybe
Toast message
https://mises.org/mises-daily/children-and-rights
> the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.
> Regardless of his age, we must grant to every child the absolute right to run away and to find new foster parents who will voluntarily adopt him, or to try to exist on his own.
> Now if a parent may own his child, then he may also transfer that ownership to someone else. He may give the child out for adoption, or he may sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. In short, we must face the fact that the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children.
Then you’re not one. Hooray! Libertarians believe race is a matter of economic viability. You don’t.
I generally like that idea, but of course I draw the line somewhere as almost all libertarians do.
I don't see why a libertarian can't be racist. Freedom means you can think whatever you want about another person, or group of people. You can also defend yourself (or your race) when attacked. And we are *certainly* being attacked.
To take your angle, if jews were just existing somewhere and not harming anyone, yes I would want to leave them alone. But of course they're doing the opposite of that.
Libertarianism says we agree on a few set ground rules so the system works(definition of property, definition of harm, definition of adult, definition of consent) and then use that to determine issue.
What you're quoting is a pedophile libertine
>Everyone can do whatever they want so long as it doesn't infringe someone else's rights.
So, if someone has the right to travel, I can't build a house because they might want to walk through that space? Conversely, if they have the right to personal property, they can build toll booths on all the popular paths and I can't knock them down.
The very basis is nonsensical.
Not to a libertarian! All rights are exactly identical in every way, except where economic policy comes into play, in which case whichever right is willing to be worth more on the Free Market™ takes precedence.
https://jls.mises.org/
I'll appeal to their authority