Consume Product

"Antisemitism is never acceptable in Texas, and we will do everything we can to fight it," said Governor Abbott. "The State of Texas stands with Israel and the Jewish community, and we must escalate our efforts to protect against antisemitism at Texas colleges and universities and across our state. Across the country, acts of antisemitism have grown in number, size, and danger to the Jewish community since Hamas' deadly attack on October 7th. Texas took immediate action to protect Jewish schools, synagogues, and other key locations. Many Texas colleges and universities also acted quickly to condemn antisemitism, but some radical organizations on our campuses engaged in acts that have no place in Texas. Now, we must work to ensure that our college campuses are safe spaces for members of the Jewish community." - Faggot Abbott

i agree with the sentiments generally, but this is a dirty data issue. some of these issues apply to how census data is collected, and others how it's defined.

texas was once part of mexico. it was already very high % latino and native american. they just weren't counted in population numbers back in 1845. at all.

and since most people still self identify using "one drop" logic, a white person with a light skinned latino has latino babies. like i'm white, family is from europe. my wife has porcelain skin (even lighter than mine), blonde hair, blue eyes, freckles, and yet grandpappy was a german immigrant to the rural mountains of argentina. so technically our kids under current paradigms are "latino" or "hispanic" even though they'll come out with pastey white skin, grow up in an upper middle or upper class white conservative family, in a low crime area of town where people act civilized.

DEI / affirmative action cemented this even further as kids who would identify as white were punished for it, discriminated against... so many would identify as latino if they thought could pull it off at all, and no one would do anything about it, just like how senator pocahontas claimed she was cherokee fucking indian. shit, i went to college decades ago and kids from my high school were already doing it.

the black % has gone down significantly, from 30% in the 1800s to 12% today.

meanwhile texas has been at the forefront of pushing for states' rights in punting illegals. the problem is federal courts have repeatedly held states have zero rights when it comes to immigration enforcement... they passed a ban on renting to illegals, requiring citizenship to get a place, but that was held unconstitutional. they put up barb wire and fencing and river blockages to get people to stop crossing the border illegally, and SCOTUS told them to take it down.

the problem isn't texas... it's the federal government. SCOTUS and the federal courts need some heavy redaction.

My rep had a town hall last year. Marine corps veteran, last name is “Fallon”. Gleeful that Texas was soon becoming a non-white majority state.
Pro Zionist. Pro street shitter. Pro open borders.

They are traitors and should be executed.

Same as every conservative institution on the planet. Run interference for the left and obstruct or misdirect anything threatening to undo leftist gains.

The only difference between the parties is how deep they've got their foot in the destruction accelerator pedal.

https://xcancel.com/Apolitical3678/status/1924543451950891115

Honestly, this is the historical reality.

The Whig Party was formed as the antithesis to the Federalist Party. The Whigs wanted to continue the Lockean tradition of respecting the rights of the people and self-determination through minimal government. The Federalists wanted to build a strong nation by consolidating power in the federal government.

After many years of back-and-forth, eventually the Whigs became the dominant party.

The Democratic Party was invented to combat the Whigs. They wanted to give people the power to vote themselves money and power and consolidate power among an elite few super-wealthy. It was almost by mistake that they stumbled upon two popular issues that made them the new part of the South before the Civil War: tariffs and slavery.

See, the Whigs used tariffs both to encourage manufacturing at home but also as a revenue source. With tariffs, the United States was rapidly becoming the economic powerhouse of the world all while tax rates were practically zero. The South felt pressured by the tariffs because they were competing with India in the cotton trade, and the UK was putting tariffs on cotton as a response to the US putting tariffs on their manufactured goods. The cotton industry was also mechanizing and they required equipment that could be bought cheaply in the UK but the tariffs made them buy from American manufacturers instead.

Anyway, the slavery issue was really the one that made the democrats popular. The fear of slave revolts was forefront, and various abolitionists weren't helping. Democrats voted for democrats to accumulate power among the wealthy few with the promise that they would protect the people from any slave uprising.

The Republican Party came into being as a third party because the Whigs refused to do anything about the rising threat from the democrats. The Republicans promised to wage political war against the democratic elite. Abolition wasn't even a primary concern of the party.

My point is this: The Democratic Party is evil and blight on our political system, and always has been. At the conclusion of the Civil War, the Republican Party had a window of opportunity where they could've abolished the Democratic Party and confiscated all the assets of the wealthy elite running it, but instead they made peace. The Republican Party had one mission, and it failed in it, a long time ago.

The Republican Party since the Civil War has been trudging along, tagging a number of unrelated issues as their political platform and existing as the opposition party (in name only). It serves no purpose. It has no positive identity other than "We're not democrats!"

We need a new party, two actually. The first needs to be the "Anti-Democratic Party" which exists for the SOLE purpose of destroying the powerbase of the democratic and republican party. Anyone who holds immense wealth and political influence should be targeted by these people. The end goal is to return power to the people (literally, the white landowners, not "people" in general.) We'll know that this party has succeeded when suffrage is limited to only white landowners and when the constitution is re-written to prevent expansion of voting rights beyond this.

AFTER the anti-democratic party is successful, we can bring back the Whig Party, which exists solely to protect the individual rights of white landowners and no one else.

How many of those spics are illegal? Most I’m guessing?