New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
66
posted 11 months ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +66Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
11 months ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
i agree with the sentiments generally, but this is a dirty data issue. some of these issues apply to how census data is collected, and others how it's defined.

texas was once part of mexico. it was already very high % latino and native american. they just weren't counted in population numbers back in 1845. at all.

and since most people still self identify using "one drop" logic, a white person with a light skinned latino has latino babies. like i'm white, family is from europe. my wife has porcelain skin (even lighter than mine), blonde hair, blue eyes, freckles, and yet grandpappy was a german immigrant to the rural mountains of argentina. so technically our kids under current paradigms are "latino" or "hispanic" even though they'll come out with pastey white skin, grow up in an upper middle or upper class white conservative family, in a low crime area of town where people act civilized.

DEI / affirmative action cemented this even further as kids who would identify as white were punished for it, discriminated against... so many would identify as latino if they thought could pull it off at all, and no one would do anything about it, just like how senator pocahontas claimed she was cherokee fucking indian. shit, i went to college decades ago and kids from my high school were already doing it.

the black % has gone down significantly, from 30% in the 1800s to 12% today.

meanwhile texas has been at the forefront of pushing for states' rights in punting illegals. the problem is federal courts have repeatedly held states have zero rights when it comes to immigration enforcement... they passed a ban on renting to illegals, requiring citizenship to get a place, but that was held unconstitutional. they put up barb wire and fencing and river blockages to get people to stop crossing the border illegally, and SCOTUS told them to take it down.

the problem isn't texas... it's the federal government. SCOTUS and the federal courts need some heavy redaction.
TallestSkil on scored.co
11 months ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
> texas was once part of mexico. it was already very high % latino and native american.

Literally fucking no. Texas was 90% white in 1950. You know nothing.

>meanwhile texas has been at the forefront of pushing for states' rights in punting illegals.

And done nothing. And done nothing. And done nothing. And. Done. Absolutely. Nothing. It’s illegal not to worship Israel there, though!

>the problem is federal courts

No, it really, really isn’t.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
11 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> Literally fucking no. Texas was 90% white in 1950. You know nothing.

and I'm saying the validity of this statement is ... absent. the data you're looking at is just incorrect. texas was part of mexico until 1836. it joined the US in 1845. where do you think all the latinos and natives who were there went between 1836 and 1950? for example, the US census reports only 470 natives in the state in 1900. but at that same time, other records show the commanche and caddo tribes each had over 10k people in TX. the historical numbers you're looking at are garbage.

> And done nothing. And done nothing.

what do you expect them to do? here's a federal appeals court shutting them down https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/court-strikes-down-discriminatory-anti-immigrant-housing-ordinance-texas

> No, it really, really isn’t.

oh, i didn't realize you're fucking retarded. HEY RETARDFINDER, I FOUND ONE
TallestSkil on scored.co
11 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> where do you think all the latinos and natives who were there went between 1836 and 1950?

They didn’t exist. Texas was settled by Americans. It’s why they ignored Mexican law and declared independence in the first place. You know fucking nothing, my dude.

>what do you expect them to do

# THEIR. FUCKING. JOBS. YOU. INSUFFERABLY. BRAINWASHED. IMBECILE.

>federal appeals court

Oooooooooooooh, someone in a dress said something! That means you have to commit genocide on yourself! So scary! We’re helpless in the face of dress-man!

>[u dum I say so I win]

Thanks for admitting that you personally support white genocide and are promoting jews historical revisionism about the breadth and scope of white settlement. Kill yourself immediately. Texas was white. So was California. Nothing you say or do will ever change this.
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
11 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
lol, you're one of those psyop grifters who says unhinged shit along with hot topics like white genocide, just to make white rights proponents look unhinged. go back to your underground child sex dungeon where you molest jewish babies, you pedo kike.
TallestSkil on scored.co
11 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>you’re insane because I say so

>no I don’t have to prove anything I say

>no I don’t have to disprove anything you say

>you told the truth therefore you make others look bad

>MUH OPTIIIIIIICS YOU CAN’T TELL THE TRUTH BECAUSE THAT HURTS PEOPLE’S FEE FEES

>also you’re a jew because I can’t prove you wrong

# You have conceded the argument and admitted everything I said is objectively true. Texas was 90% white just 60 years ago. California was 90% white just 60 years ago. Nothing you say or do will ever change these facts. Your entire narrative is a hoax. Thanks for admitting that you personally support white genocide. Thanks for admitting and are promoting jews’ historical revisionism about the breadth and scope of white settlement.
Toast message