You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
genesisSOC on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
The first paper explains the current process of "isolating" and "purifying" "viruses." Which is taking a random cell from an animal or human, poisoning it with antibiotics, starving it, and then saying somewhere in that toxic clump are "viral particles" that you then put under an electron microscope and pretend are real and cause disease. Which not a single study proves causes any disease. If you weren't a fucking retarded faggot, you'd have a scholar account and could actually read it.
The second study shows a double blind placebo controlled trial of having mold sensitive people inhaling two types of mold and not a single one of them got sick, which is literally impossible if mold causes disease. Instead, it refers to what actually makes them sick: wet modern building materials off-gassing toxins. Just as the jews intended.
Sit down, shut up, and never speak again, retard.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
>put under a microscope and pretend are real
Don't believe your lying eyes, goy!
You know I was going to go through your argument and pick it apart piece by piece but you don't deserve that. That's the problem with the polite right; they'll entertain bullshit and try to formulate arguments against it. It's a waste of time. Your viewpoint is retarded and your explanation is bullshit.
What you're seeing with your eyes is a toxic clump of animal/human and bacteria DNA. The jews are telling you somewhere in that clump are "viral particles" even though the DNA has never been sequenced or separated from the animal/human DNA, thus never "isolated" or "purified." "Believe what we're telling you, goy! You saw the moon landing and planes fly into the Twin Towers!" You can't argue because you're a fucking retard with no understanding of basic science. If germ theory was real, raw milk would kill us yet Whites are massively empowered by it. Shut the fuck up you vaccinated retarded nigger faggot jew.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> then put under an electron microscope
You know microscopes don't just show random images, right? It shows what is there. You can argue it's not good enough, but it is consistent, and you can distinguish different things, implying it works.
> you'd have a scholar account and could actually read it
That is quite a retarded non-argument btw. Shows how much of a "scholar" you are.
> which is literally impossible if mold causes disease.
No. People have immune systems, and they work to varying degrees. A normal body has a functional immune system, meaning mold may not have an effect. But if that person has some health condition, he can be vulnerable to certain things like mold.
> what actually makes them sick: wet modern building materials off-gassing toxins.
Sure... but how does any of this relate to anything you said before?
The electron microscope shows you a toxic clump of animal/human and bacteria DNA. You can't argue what is there. How are you this retarded? You not having a scholar account proves you don't read enough science. You don't care enough about truth and understanding. Just the perfect little jewfag. People don't have immune systems as there are no viruses or germs. Whatever you think White blood cells or T cells or anything else is doing is very different than what it's actually doing. Every participant chosen had "weak immune systems" and were "already proven to be susceptible to mold." They breathed in far higher concentrations that would cause extreme symptoms in normal people, much less those who have "weak immune systems." None of them got sick. Not a single one. That's impossible if you believe what you believe, therefore you're fucking wrong and retarded. The wet modern building materials shows that off-gassing their own jew-made toxins causes disease, not mold, not "viruses," not "germs." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14689309/ It's not "mold mycotoxins" it's fucking VOCs. You're 10000000x better off buying an old house full of mold than a modern house full of jew toxins. Because breathing mold doesn't make you sick, because there are no viruses or germs, because there is no immune system. There are only toxins. Want more proof?:
1. Rosenau et al. 1919 9 experiments in a group of 49 healthy men. 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.
2. Schmidt et al. 1920
196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 developed colds and 3 developed grippe. 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, 5 developed grippe and 4 colds. 43 controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions 8 developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the "virus".
3. Wahl et al. 1919
3 experiments to infect 6 healthy men.
0/6 men became sick after being exposed to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people.
4. Rosenau et al. 1918
8 experiments in a group of 62 men.
0/62 men became sick after being exposed to sick people/bodily fluids of the sick.
5. McCoy et al. 1918
8 experiments in a group of 50 men 0/50 men became sick after being exposed to sick people/bodily fluids of the sick.
6. Williams et al. 1921
Tried to infect 45 healthy men. 0/45 became ill after being exposed to mucous secretions from sick people.
7. Robertson & Groves 1924
Exposed 100 healthy individuals. 0/100 became sick after being exposed to bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza.
8. Burnet & Lush 1937
Exposed 200 healthy people. 0/200 became sick after being exposed to bodily secretions from people with influenza.
All of these became so effective at disproving germ theory that the jews made it illegal to continue doing them under the grounds of being "unethical" lmfao. Even "COVID-19" was just fucking 5G, like every "epidemic" before being completely caused by the electrification of the earth. But no goy, fear the 'zika' virus, not the constant microwaving of your body!
It's a matter of dosage AND exposure time. [Black mold](https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/24862-black-mold) is known to cause various symptoms for example.
> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14689309/
The conclusion doesn't exclude any other conclusion. The same effect can have multiple causes.
> Want more proof?:
Sure. Without actual sources to look into, I'll do it quickly.
1. If the disease is not transmittable, of course they didn't get sick. The flu for example spreads by ingestion of fluids of infected people, which can be easily transmitted by having 2 people touch the same pole in public transportation, or food or a handshake.
2. Not representative enough. WHAT disease did they even get?
3. Too low sample size.
4. - 8. Depends on the experiments. How did 8/43 people get sick from a control group exposed to salt, but 0 out of 457 in the other experiments? Isn't this a bit inconsistent for you to be credible? Also there are flu seasons - infection rate increases around winter and decreases around summer.
Also what's even your point? People all across the world get continually sick, meaning it can't be just bad house material. There are literal niggers and pajeets in mudhuts and tin shacks for example. Covid, as ridiculous as it was (basically an overhyped flu), caused infections all over the world as well, and hospitals in New York actually DID try and succeeded to infect patients for government bucks (what was it? 30000$+ for each case?).
What you do is all just nitpicking and a massive lack of critical thinking.
I would take you more seriously if you didn't already go full retard with flat Earth. I mean... how high can we stack the tower of retardation? And add to that a nice, convincing personality aka:
> You don't care enough about truth and understanding.
> Just the perfect little jewfag.
> If you weren't a fucking retarded faggot, you'd have a scholar account and could actually read it.
Do you seek to be hated by absolutely everybody on the planet for your personality combined with idiocy?
The second study shows a double blind placebo controlled trial of having mold sensitive people inhaling two types of mold and not a single one of them got sick, which is literally impossible if mold causes disease. Instead, it refers to what actually makes them sick: wet modern building materials off-gassing toxins. Just as the jews intended.
Sit down, shut up, and never speak again, retard.
Don't believe your lying eyes, goy!
You know I was going to go through your argument and pick it apart piece by piece but you don't deserve that. That's the problem with the polite right; they'll entertain bullshit and try to formulate arguments against it. It's a waste of time. Your viewpoint is retarded and your explanation is bullshit.
You're either projecting, or you have anger issues
You know microscopes don't just show random images, right? It shows what is there. You can argue it's not good enough, but it is consistent, and you can distinguish different things, implying it works.
> you'd have a scholar account and could actually read it
That is quite a retarded non-argument btw. Shows how much of a "scholar" you are.
> which is literally impossible if mold causes disease.
No. People have immune systems, and they work to varying degrees. A normal body has a functional immune system, meaning mold may not have an effect. But if that person has some health condition, he can be vulnerable to certain things like mold.
> what actually makes them sick: wet modern building materials off-gassing toxins.
Sure... but how does any of this relate to anything you said before?
1. Rosenau et al. 1919 9 experiments in a group of 49 healthy men. 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.
2. Schmidt et al. 1920
196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 developed colds and 3 developed grippe. 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, 5 developed grippe and 4 colds. 43 controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions 8 developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the "virus".
3. Wahl et al. 1919
3 experiments to infect 6 healthy men.
0/6 men became sick after being exposed to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people.
4. Rosenau et al. 1918
8 experiments in a group of 62 men.
0/62 men became sick after being exposed to sick people/bodily fluids of the sick.
5. McCoy et al. 1918
8 experiments in a group of 50 men 0/50 men became sick after being exposed to sick people/bodily fluids of the sick.
6. Williams et al. 1921
Tried to infect 45 healthy men. 0/45 became ill after being exposed to mucous secretions from sick people.
7. Robertson & Groves 1924
Exposed 100 healthy individuals. 0/100 became sick after being exposed to bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza.
8. Burnet & Lush 1937
Exposed 200 healthy people. 0/200 became sick after being exposed to bodily secretions from people with influenza.
All of these became so effective at disproving germ theory that the jews made it illegal to continue doing them under the grounds of being "unethical" lmfao. Even "COVID-19" was just fucking 5G, like every "epidemic" before being completely caused by the electrification of the earth. But no goy, fear the 'zika' virus, not the constant microwaving of your body!
I will ignore your petty, personal insults.
> They breathed in far higher concentrations
It's a matter of dosage AND exposure time. [Black mold](https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/24862-black-mold) is known to cause various symptoms for example.
> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14689309/
The conclusion doesn't exclude any other conclusion. The same effect can have multiple causes.
> Want more proof?:
Sure. Without actual sources to look into, I'll do it quickly.
1. If the disease is not transmittable, of course they didn't get sick. The flu for example spreads by ingestion of fluids of infected people, which can be easily transmitted by having 2 people touch the same pole in public transportation, or food or a handshake.
2. Not representative enough. WHAT disease did they even get?
3. Too low sample size.
4. - 8. Depends on the experiments. How did 8/43 people get sick from a control group exposed to salt, but 0 out of 457 in the other experiments? Isn't this a bit inconsistent for you to be credible? Also there are flu seasons - infection rate increases around winter and decreases around summer.
Also what's even your point? People all across the world get continually sick, meaning it can't be just bad house material. There are literal niggers and pajeets in mudhuts and tin shacks for example. Covid, as ridiculous as it was (basically an overhyped flu), caused infections all over the world as well, and hospitals in New York actually DID try and succeeded to infect patients for government bucks (what was it? 30000$+ for each case?).
What you do is all just nitpicking and a massive lack of critical thinking.
I would take you more seriously if you didn't already go full retard with flat Earth. I mean... how high can we stack the tower of retardation? And add to that a nice, convincing personality aka:
> You don't care enough about truth and understanding.
> Just the perfect little jewfag.
> If you weren't a fucking retarded faggot, you'd have a scholar account and could actually read it.
Do you seek to be hated by absolutely everybody on the planet for your personality combined with idiocy?