New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
66
Spread the virus, purebloods (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by genesisSOC on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +66Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
genesisSOC on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The electron microscope shows you a toxic clump of animal/human and bacteria DNA. You can't argue what is there. How are you this retarded? You not having a scholar account proves you don't read enough science. You don't care enough about truth and understanding. Just the perfect little jewfag. People don't have immune systems as there are no viruses or germs. Whatever you think White blood cells or T cells or anything else is doing is very different than what it's actually doing. Every participant chosen had "weak immune systems" and were "already proven to be susceptible to mold." They breathed in far higher concentrations that would cause extreme symptoms in normal people, much less those who have "weak immune systems." None of them got sick. Not a single one. That's impossible if you believe what you believe, therefore you're fucking wrong and retarded. The wet modern building materials shows that off-gassing their own jew-made toxins causes disease, not mold, not "viruses," not "germs." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14689309/ It's not "mold mycotoxins" it's fucking VOCs. You're 10000000x better off buying an old house full of mold than a modern house full of jew toxins. Because breathing mold doesn't make you sick, because there are no viruses or germs, because there is no immune system. There are only toxins. Want more proof?:
1. Rosenau et al. 1919 9 experiments in a group of 49 healthy men. 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.
2. Schmidt et al. 1920
196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 developed colds and 3 developed grippe. 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, 5 developed grippe and 4 colds. 43 controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions 8 developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the "virus".
3. Wahl et al. 1919
3 experiments to infect 6 healthy men.
0/6 men became sick after being exposed to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people.
4. Rosenau et al. 1918
8 experiments in a group of 62 men.
0/62 men became sick after being exposed to sick people/bodily fluids of the sick.
5. McCoy et al. 1918
8 experiments in a group of 50 men 0/50 men became sick after being exposed to sick people/bodily fluids of the sick.
6. Williams et al. 1921
Tried to infect 45 healthy men. 0/45 became ill after being exposed to mucous secretions from sick people.
7. Robertson & Groves 1924
Exposed 100 healthy individuals. 0/100 became sick after being exposed to bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza.
8. Burnet & Lush 1937
Exposed 200 healthy people. 0/200 became sick after being exposed to bodily secretions from people with influenza.
All of these became so effective at disproving germ theory that the jews made it illegal to continue doing them under the grounds of being "unethical" lmfao. Even "COVID-19" was just fucking 5G, like every "epidemic" before being completely caused by the electrification of the earth. But no goy, fear the 'zika' virus, not the constant microwaving of your body!
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> Just the perfect little jewfag.

I will ignore your petty, personal insults.

> They breathed in far higher concentrations

It's a matter of dosage AND exposure time. [Black mold](https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/24862-black-mold) is known to cause various symptoms for example.

> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14689309/

The conclusion doesn't exclude any other conclusion. The same effect can have multiple causes.

> Want more proof?:

Sure. Without actual sources to look into, I'll do it quickly.

1. If the disease is not transmittable, of course they didn't get sick. The flu for example spreads by ingestion of fluids of infected people, which can be easily transmitted by having 2 people touch the same pole in public transportation, or food or a handshake.

2. Not representative enough. WHAT disease did they even get?

3. Too low sample size.

4. - 8. Depends on the experiments. How did 8/43 people get sick from a control group exposed to salt, but 0 out of 457 in the other experiments? Isn't this a bit inconsistent for you to be credible? Also there are flu seasons - infection rate increases around winter and decreases around summer.

Also what's even your point? People all across the world get continually sick, meaning it can't be just bad house material. There are literal niggers and pajeets in mudhuts and tin shacks for example. Covid, as ridiculous as it was (basically an overhyped flu), caused infections all over the world as well, and hospitals in New York actually DID try and succeeded to infect patients for government bucks (what was it? 30000$+ for each case?).

What you do is all just nitpicking and a massive lack of critical thinking.

I would take you more seriously if you didn't already go full retard with flat Earth. I mean... how high can we stack the tower of retardation? And add to that a nice, convincing personality aka:

> You don't care enough about truth and understanding.

> Just the perfect little jewfag.

> If you weren't a fucking retarded faggot, you'd have a scholar account and could actually read it.

Do you seek to be hated by absolutely everybody on the planet for your personality combined with idiocy?
Toast message