New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Can you really call someone a member of the Race if they have no heirs? If race is a contiguous line of people, and one is a dead end, is it right to declare them essentially "anathema" from Whiteness?

Just an interesting shower thought I had. There are other achievements among great men outside of simply having children, but those are so far exceptional that I would put them in a separate discussion.
You must log in or sign up to comment
8 comments:
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Huh? Who cares. Stop finding ways to alienate your brothers and sisters.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
It absolutely matters, but it shouldn't be some derision or shunning thing like op is talking about.

It should be a social goal and cultural hope. It should be a promotion of importance.

But many people can't have children. Many people will never get married. Many people SHOULDNT have children because of genetic issues or their own psychological problems. That doesn't mean they can't contribute in a meaningful way.
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yes you can. They are alive. Teaching or helping those alive helps to preserve Whites. I have role models and older adults that helped me that were not my father and mother
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They don't have to be *your* mother or father, but would you agree it would be better if they were at least *a* mother or father? Unless they leave a great impact on history, their connection to the future is null
Weematanyeh on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
I get your point but that's just not what the word race means. Are young children not to be considered white because they dont have children of their own? What age is the cut off for being white if you are childless?
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
If race is about genetic relatedness and you pick a random European from history, if they never had any children then nobody is directly related to them. Their ancestry is White, but their progeny is not. In the same way as someone who has mixed race children. As an individual you can say they are White, but as a lineage, not anymore.
Weematanyeh on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Race isnt about being directly related currently, even if a man had no kids we still share common ancestors with him from thousands of years ago.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The reason why the white race has survived and excelled is because we regularly kick people out of our tribe for various reasons.

Genetic dead-ends (people who refuse to reproduce) are one sort of person who does not belong to our race. They serve no purpose. Maybe we can get some limited utility out of them, but in the long run, they are doing us a favor by excluding their genes from the future. If there is a resource shortage, they should be the first to be cut off.

That said, it is not uncommon to have an animal that has poor genes give birth to an animal with superior genes. It is the duty of every white person to reproduce with another white person, if but for the chance that their kid may be a genius.

The idea that unity with the entire race, or some form of solidarity, is the reason why we have survived and excelled is ridiculous. Steel sharpens steel. We developed technology because we endlessly struggled against each other in deadly competition. At the time Europe colonized Africa, it was but a tiny line item in a budget focused on developing modern nations capable of waging war on a scale never seen before.
Toast message