Can you really call someone a member of the Race if they have no heirs? If race is a contiguous line of people, and one is a dead end, is it right to declare them essentially "anathema" from Whiteness?
Just an interesting shower thought I had. There are other achievements among great men outside of simply having children, but those are so far exceptional that I would put them in a separate discussion.
Genetic dead-ends (people who refuse to reproduce) are one sort of person who does not belong to our race. They serve no purpose. Maybe we can get some limited utility out of them, but in the long run, they are doing us a favor by excluding their genes from the future. If there is a resource shortage, they should be the first to be cut off.
That said, it is not uncommon to have an animal that has poor genes give birth to an animal with superior genes. It is the duty of every white person to reproduce with another white person, if but for the chance that their kid may be a genius.
The idea that unity with the entire race, or some form of solidarity, is the reason why we have survived and excelled is ridiculous. Steel sharpens steel. We developed technology because we endlessly struggled against each other in deadly competition. At the time Europe colonized Africa, it was but a tiny line item in a budget focused on developing modern nations capable of waging war on a scale never seen before.