Consume Product

>This doesn't contradict the Neanderthal hypothesis, as it's possible that Neanderthals from southern regions were more brown and those who migrated north because lighter.

The hypothesis is that Neanderthals became swarthier as the result of mixing with Homo Sapiens, not from evolution. There are some Berber tribes who are fair skinned and blue-eyed despite been living in a very sunny environment for many generations. They could be the descendants of a population of Neanderthals that had little contact with Homo Sapiens despite remaining in North Africa after the end of the Ice age, but it's more accepted that they are the result of later Nordic migration southwards.

>However, the biggest problem with the theory is that - at least based on the Neanderthal as shown by modern science - White people seem more similar to niggers than the Neanderthals in the bone structure for example.

Unfortunately I can't quote anyone else on this other than the Cachets, in their writings they say that the first archaeologists were mostly priests, who often systematically destroyed all evidence suggesting that Europeans had had any type of culture prior to Christianity.

When those priests found Neanderthal skulls, large skulls that obviously had held brains larger than those of modern humans, they had to do something about it because both those believing in the theory of evolution and the Judeo-Christians claiming that Pagan Europe was primitive had a serious problem, so they intentionally misplaced the spinal column and the lower jaw, making the Neanderthal look ape-like.

That image has already been proven to be false, but the image of the Neanderthal as some ape-like creature with a protruding face still remains and people understandably don’t want to have such a forebear, and so the Cro Magnon mulatto is accepted instead as being the proto-European.

So in reality the Neanderthal didn’t have a protruding face at all, and the supra-orbital ridge, found in adults only, can still occasionally be found in modern adult Europeans: [example 1](https://thuleanperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/nowitzki_dpa_400.jpg), [example 2](https://thuleanperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/rugby_player_with_a_pronounced_supraorbital_ridge.jpg?w=600&h=400).

They would have looked pretty much just like the aboriginal peoples of North, Central and Eastern Europe during classical antiquity. Gallic Coins with portraits of Gauls with Neanderthal features: [example 1](https://thuleanperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/vercingetorix.jpg), [example 2](https://thuleanperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/rrc-448-2-obverse.jpg)

>Therefore in the "out of Africa" hypothesis I consider that homo sapiens who came out of Africa as a common ancestor that we have with niggers, but we followed different evolutionary paths.

That's very plausible too, just like what you said earlier that niggers might be the result of mixing with Homo Erectus or another ape, but it seems to be much less accepted or talked about for obvious reasons. The official story tells us that we are all Homo Sapiens with just bits of other species DNA, and that people of African ancestry have the least of those other bits of DNA thus making Africans more "human" than Europeans, even though it's not that simple but it is how it was meant to be understood by the general public.