1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)2 children
Hitler made four mistakes.
1. Didn’t purge the generals like he purged the rest of German society, which would have ensured his generals wouldn’t explicitly lie to and disobey him on the front.
2. Didn’t allow for home-rule in the lands he freed from the Soviets, which would have freed up German occupation troops and earned the Wehrmacht thousands of non-German volunteers to keep fighting.
3. Didn’t capture the British Army at Dunkirk, using them as a bargaining chip to demand the United Kingdom *status quo antebellum* peace early.
4. Didn’t exterminate the jews of Europe.
Nice anti-white D&C, by the way. I see you assign no blame to the British or French or Russians, who “totally should have disobeyed their governments and refused to fight Germany,” because “only” Americans are guilty of that, right?
> Didn’t purge the generals like he purged the rest of German society, which would have ensured his generals wouldn’t explicitly lie to and disobey him on the front.
First, he wasn't in a position to "purge" anyone. Hitler didn't have absolute power like the Jewish movies like to represent. Second, you can't easily replace a general. Or you end up in a situation like Stalin that did the purge and then his new generals were so incompetent and it almost cost him the war.
> Didn’t allow for home-rule in the lands he freed from the Soviets
Most people didn't feel "freed" from the Soviets.
> earned the Wehrmacht thousands of non-German volunteers to keep fighting
Non-Germans couldn't serve in the Wehrmacht, but non-Germans were recruited in the Waffen-SS. Hundreds of thousands of them.
> Didn’t capture the British Army at Dunkirk
Well it's easy to say after the fact, but the attempt to make peace with Britain made a lot of sense at the time.
> Didn’t exterminate the jews of Europe
The Einsatzgruppen were specifically targeting and mass murdering Jews in the field, while other kikes were put in labor camps to make them help with the war effort. The SS also executed all the commies before the camps were liberated.
So on the Jews, Hitler (or I should say: Heinrich Himmler) gets a 10/10.
The idea that the SS were not brutal enough against the Jews is, paradoxically, Jewish propaganda targeted to far-right people like us. If you don't think the Third Reich was evil they try to put you off it by claiming that it was ineffective / too soft.
> Nice anti-white D&C, by the way.
You're right, I regret that I singled out Americans and I apologize.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
>First, he wasn't in a position to "purge" anyone.
The Führer, who managed to reorganize every other aspect of German society and government–firing jewish collaborators everywhere–couldn’t fire people in his own army?
>Second, you can't easily replace a general.
Sure. Nevertheless, he should have.
>Most people didn't feel "freed" from the Soviets.
[They](https://historicaltribune.wordpress.com/tag/german-liberation/) literally [welcomed](https://www.ww2incolor.com/gallery/german-forces/52608/liberators-in-riga) the [Germans](https://whiteresister.com/index_php/archive/1208-video-ukrainians-welcome-hitler-as-liberator-1941/) as [liberators.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJPuLXpkASg)
>Well it's easy to say after the fact
Hitler explicitly gave his generals, who were utterly astonished, *a hold order* to allow Britain and France time to evacuate. So it’s easy to say during the fact.
>but the attempt to make peace with Britain made a lot of sense at the time.
Of course! It’s not Hitler’s fault he thought he was up against white men and not jews wearing white skin suits. It’s not his fault he thought actual human beings were his opponents, instead of subhuman demons. It’s genuinely not his fault that he thought he could appeal to the reason and sapience innate to a human being. He was simply fighting nonhumans and didn’t realize it until it was too late.
But it was still a mistake.
>The Einsatzgruppen were specifically targeting and mass murdering Jews in the field
Still have that hoax internalized, huh.
>So on the Jews, Hitler (or I should say: Heinrich Himmler) gets a 10/10.
*They conquered the world completely and permanently* as a direct result of Hitler not exterminating them. So no, he gets a negative infinity out of ten. If Germany had slaughtered every single jew in the lands it conquered, *even if they still hadn’t won the war*, jews wouldn’t have the power they do today.
>it was ineffective / too soft.
It was, though. Their eternal enemy was *purposely kept alive* during a total war scenario in which Germans were being slaughtered.
>You're right, I regret that I singled out Americans and I apologize.
The entire damn war was a mistake. Everyone should have done better. Yet here we are, still arguing over how *much* of our enemies we should leave alive. Can we ever learn?
> Still have that hoax [Einsatzgruppen killing jews] internalized, huh.
Yes, I do. I'm open minded about it, so I'm happy to listen to you if you have some argument / source, but it seems to me that there is a lot of evidence (which includes Himmler's speeches and ideology) to say that the SS mass murdered Jews, especially in retaliation for guerrilla warfare.
In fact, it's very hard to believe that they *wouldn't* kill Jews considering the situation.
> They conquered the world completely and permanently as a direct result of Hitler not exterminating them
The US joined WWI only because the Jews wanted it to. Now the Jews can't manage to make the US go to war against Iran. Therefore I'm not sure if they have more power now or in the 1920s.
> If Germany had slaughtered every single jew in the lands it conquered, even if they still hadn’t won the war, jews wouldn’t have the power they do today.
That depends on how many Jews they could put their hands on. I know that today every Jew claims to have at least 5 grandmothers who went to Auschwitz, but all the Jews in America, Britain, Palestine, and those who escaped from the Eastern front must have been the vast majority of the total Jewish population - not in the hands of the SS.
> Their eternal enemy was purposely kept alive during a total war scenario in which Germans were being slaughtered
But I'm glad they did, or our ranks would be much thinner today. The vast majority of White Supremacists today broke the brainwashing by first understanding that the holohoax didn't happen, and only *then* understanding that it should have. Had the SS exterminated everyone in the camps, very few people would have been able start the journey to become based.
> The entire damn war was a mistake. Everyone should have done better. Yet here we are, still arguing over how much of our enemies we should leave alive. Can we ever learn?
What we need to learn is to be united in our racial consciousness. Civic nationalism which brought Europeans to slaughter each other was the main cause of our demise. Don't give the kikes too much credit: France and Britain attacked Germany due to petty nationalism, and not because they were mind-controlled by the Jews (although the Jews certainly played a role).
The decline of nationalism of the last decades (e.g. the EU) could offer us the opportunity to rebuild our identity based on race.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
>the SS mass murdered Jews, especially in retaliation for guerrilla warfare.
>considering the situation
If they were engaged in guerrilla warfare, it wouldn't be murder. It’d be wartime action.
>Now the Jews can't manage to make the US go to war against Iran.
Oh, ye of little faith (in Satan). Of course they can. If they did a false flag *today,* the United States would instantly go to war (but not declare it, goyim! that’s old fashioned) with Iran. The entire government supports it, and all it would take is the media showing people pictures of crying corpses and algorithmic-generated destruction to get the support they need. What is anyone going to do about it? Did we want to go to war in the Middle East for 25 years in 2001? lol, no. WHOOPS, BUILDING GO BOOM BOOM, NOW DO WHAT THE GOVERNMENT SAYS!
Covid should have proved to you by now they control all of humanity more than at any time in history. If they say ‘jump,’ people say “how quickly do you want us to kill ourselves?”
>That depends on how many Jews they could put their hands on.
I think it was roughly four million, at least from pre-war population numbers in the lands Germany managed to reach.
>But I'm glad they did, or our ranks would be much thinner today.
Why would “killing the people who destroyed the white race” result in the white race still being destroyed?
>The vast majority of White Supremacists today broke the brainwashing
There wouldn't *be* the brainwashing if the jews hadn’t lived.
>The decline of nationalism of the last decades (e.g. the EU) could offer us the opportunity to rebuild our identity based on race.
But it’s being superseded by trans-nationalism (globalism), so that’s just codifying the idea of “everyone on earth gangs up on this one group that doesn’t want to be part of the team” that started with WWII.
Hitler would have won if Americunts hadn't been Jewish slaves with their dicks cut off.
1. Didn’t purge the generals like he purged the rest of German society, which would have ensured his generals wouldn’t explicitly lie to and disobey him on the front.
2. Didn’t allow for home-rule in the lands he freed from the Soviets, which would have freed up German occupation troops and earned the Wehrmacht thousands of non-German volunteers to keep fighting.
3. Didn’t capture the British Army at Dunkirk, using them as a bargaining chip to demand the United Kingdom *status quo antebellum* peace early.
4. Didn’t exterminate the jews of Europe.
Nice anti-white D&C, by the way. I see you assign no blame to the British or French or Russians, who “totally should have disobeyed their governments and refused to fight Germany,” because “only” Americans are guilty of that, right?
First, he wasn't in a position to "purge" anyone. Hitler didn't have absolute power like the Jewish movies like to represent. Second, you can't easily replace a general. Or you end up in a situation like Stalin that did the purge and then his new generals were so incompetent and it almost cost him the war.
> Didn’t allow for home-rule in the lands he freed from the Soviets
Most people didn't feel "freed" from the Soviets.
> earned the Wehrmacht thousands of non-German volunteers to keep fighting
Non-Germans couldn't serve in the Wehrmacht, but non-Germans were recruited in the Waffen-SS. Hundreds of thousands of them.
> Didn’t capture the British Army at Dunkirk
Well it's easy to say after the fact, but the attempt to make peace with Britain made a lot of sense at the time.
> Didn’t exterminate the jews of Europe
The Einsatzgruppen were specifically targeting and mass murdering Jews in the field, while other kikes were put in labor camps to make them help with the war effort. The SS also executed all the commies before the camps were liberated.
So on the Jews, Hitler (or I should say: Heinrich Himmler) gets a 10/10.
The idea that the SS were not brutal enough against the Jews is, paradoxically, Jewish propaganda targeted to far-right people like us. If you don't think the Third Reich was evil they try to put you off it by claiming that it was ineffective / too soft.
> Nice anti-white D&C, by the way.
You're right, I regret that I singled out Americans and I apologize.
The Führer, who managed to reorganize every other aspect of German society and government–firing jewish collaborators everywhere–couldn’t fire people in his own army?
>Second, you can't easily replace a general.
Sure. Nevertheless, he should have.
>Most people didn't feel "freed" from the Soviets.
[They](https://historicaltribune.wordpress.com/tag/german-liberation/) literally [welcomed](https://www.ww2incolor.com/gallery/german-forces/52608/liberators-in-riga) the [Germans](https://whiteresister.com/index_php/archive/1208-video-ukrainians-welcome-hitler-as-liberator-1941/) as [liberators.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJPuLXpkASg)
>Well it's easy to say after the fact
Hitler explicitly gave his generals, who were utterly astonished, *a hold order* to allow Britain and France time to evacuate. So it’s easy to say during the fact.
>but the attempt to make peace with Britain made a lot of sense at the time.
Of course! It’s not Hitler’s fault he thought he was up against white men and not jews wearing white skin suits. It’s not his fault he thought actual human beings were his opponents, instead of subhuman demons. It’s genuinely not his fault that he thought he could appeal to the reason and sapience innate to a human being. He was simply fighting nonhumans and didn’t realize it until it was too late.
But it was still a mistake.
>The Einsatzgruppen were specifically targeting and mass murdering Jews in the field
Still have that hoax internalized, huh.
>So on the Jews, Hitler (or I should say: Heinrich Himmler) gets a 10/10.
*They conquered the world completely and permanently* as a direct result of Hitler not exterminating them. So no, he gets a negative infinity out of ten. If Germany had slaughtered every single jew in the lands it conquered, *even if they still hadn’t won the war*, jews wouldn’t have the power they do today.
>it was ineffective / too soft.
It was, though. Their eternal enemy was *purposely kept alive* during a total war scenario in which Germans were being slaughtered.
>You're right, I regret that I singled out Americans and I apologize.
The entire damn war was a mistake. Everyone should have done better. Yet here we are, still arguing over how *much* of our enemies we should leave alive. Can we ever learn?
Yes, I do. I'm open minded about it, so I'm happy to listen to you if you have some argument / source, but it seems to me that there is a lot of evidence (which includes Himmler's speeches and ideology) to say that the SS mass murdered Jews, especially in retaliation for guerrilla warfare.
In fact, it's very hard to believe that they *wouldn't* kill Jews considering the situation.
> They conquered the world completely and permanently as a direct result of Hitler not exterminating them
The US joined WWI only because the Jews wanted it to. Now the Jews can't manage to make the US go to war against Iran. Therefore I'm not sure if they have more power now or in the 1920s.
> If Germany had slaughtered every single jew in the lands it conquered, even if they still hadn’t won the war, jews wouldn’t have the power they do today.
That depends on how many Jews they could put their hands on. I know that today every Jew claims to have at least 5 grandmothers who went to Auschwitz, but all the Jews in America, Britain, Palestine, and those who escaped from the Eastern front must have been the vast majority of the total Jewish population - not in the hands of the SS.
> Their eternal enemy was purposely kept alive during a total war scenario in which Germans were being slaughtered
But I'm glad they did, or our ranks would be much thinner today. The vast majority of White Supremacists today broke the brainwashing by first understanding that the holohoax didn't happen, and only *then* understanding that it should have. Had the SS exterminated everyone in the camps, very few people would have been able start the journey to become based.
> The entire damn war was a mistake. Everyone should have done better. Yet here we are, still arguing over how much of our enemies we should leave alive. Can we ever learn?
What we need to learn is to be united in our racial consciousness. Civic nationalism which brought Europeans to slaughter each other was the main cause of our demise. Don't give the kikes too much credit: France and Britain attacked Germany due to petty nationalism, and not because they were mind-controlled by the Jews (although the Jews certainly played a role).
The decline of nationalism of the last decades (e.g. the EU) could offer us the opportunity to rebuild our identity based on race.
>considering the situation
If they were engaged in guerrilla warfare, it wouldn't be murder. It’d be wartime action.
>Now the Jews can't manage to make the US go to war against Iran.
Oh, ye of little faith (in Satan). Of course they can. If they did a false flag *today,* the United States would instantly go to war (but not declare it, goyim! that’s old fashioned) with Iran. The entire government supports it, and all it would take is the media showing people pictures of crying corpses and algorithmic-generated destruction to get the support they need. What is anyone going to do about it? Did we want to go to war in the Middle East for 25 years in 2001? lol, no. WHOOPS, BUILDING GO BOOM BOOM, NOW DO WHAT THE GOVERNMENT SAYS!
Covid should have proved to you by now they control all of humanity more than at any time in history. If they say ‘jump,’ people say “how quickly do you want us to kill ourselves?”
>That depends on how many Jews they could put their hands on.
I think it was roughly four million, at least from pre-war population numbers in the lands Germany managed to reach.
>But I'm glad they did, or our ranks would be much thinner today.
Why would “killing the people who destroyed the white race” result in the white race still being destroyed?
>The vast majority of White Supremacists today broke the brainwashing
There wouldn't *be* the brainwashing if the jews hadn’t lived.
>The decline of nationalism of the last decades (e.g. the EU) could offer us the opportunity to rebuild our identity based on race.
But it’s being superseded by trans-nationalism (globalism), so that’s just codifying the idea of “everyone on earth gangs up on this one group that doesn’t want to be part of the team” that started with WWII.