Annnnnd their it is. Stew peters slurping for shlomo
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The oxymoron of Hitler advocates following the isolation narrative they also acknowledge is fed to them by years of Juden propaganda.
Hitler and his advisors sought numerous other cultural alliances throughout the world -- he even made deals to try to move Jews to other lands as opposed to the extermination.
You would think the "camps were work camps not extermination camps" versus "hitler exterminated jews" contradictions would unleash some -- but nope .. they persist in zealotry to propaganda's radicalism.
# HITLER LOST BECAUSE HE DIDN’T FIGHT CORRECTLY. YOU WANT US TO REPEAT THAT.
Hitler would have won if Americunts hadn't been Jewish slaves with their dicks cut off.
1. Didn’t purge the generals like he purged the rest of German society, which would have ensured his generals wouldn’t explicitly lie to and disobey him on the front.
2. Didn’t allow for home-rule in the lands he freed from the Soviets, which would have freed up German occupation troops and earned the Wehrmacht thousands of non-German volunteers to keep fighting.
3. Didn’t capture the British Army at Dunkirk, using them as a bargaining chip to demand the United Kingdom *status quo antebellum* peace early.
4. Didn’t exterminate the jews of Europe.
Nice anti-white D&C, by the way. I see you assign no blame to the British or French or Russians, who “totally should have disobeyed their governments and refused to fight Germany,” because “only” Americans are guilty of that, right?
First, he wasn't in a position to "purge" anyone. Hitler didn't have absolute power like the Jewish movies like to represent. Second, you can't easily replace a general. Or you end up in a situation like Stalin that did the purge and then his new generals were so incompetent and it almost cost him the war.
> Didn’t allow for home-rule in the lands he freed from the Soviets
Most people didn't feel "freed" from the Soviets.
> earned the Wehrmacht thousands of non-German volunteers to keep fighting
Non-Germans couldn't serve in the Wehrmacht, but non-Germans were recruited in the Waffen-SS. Hundreds of thousands of them.
> Didn’t capture the British Army at Dunkirk
Well it's easy to say after the fact, but the attempt to make peace with Britain made a lot of sense at the time.
> Didn’t exterminate the jews of Europe
The Einsatzgruppen were specifically targeting and mass murdering Jews in the field, while other kikes were put in labor camps to make them help with the war effort. The SS also executed all the commies before the camps were liberated.
So on the Jews, Hitler (or I should say: Heinrich Himmler) gets a 10/10.
The idea that the SS were not brutal enough against the Jews is, paradoxically, Jewish propaganda targeted to far-right people like us. If you don't think the Third Reich was evil they try to put you off it by claiming that it was ineffective / too soft.
> Nice anti-white D&C, by the way.
You're right, I regret that I singled out Americans and I apologize.
The Führer, who managed to reorganize every other aspect of German society and government–firing jewish collaborators everywhere–couldn’t fire people in his own army?
>Second, you can't easily replace a general.
Sure. Nevertheless, he should have.
>Most people didn't feel "freed" from the Soviets.
[They](https://historicaltribune.wordpress.com/tag/german-liberation/) literally [welcomed](https://www.ww2incolor.com/gallery/german-forces/52608/liberators-in-riga) the [Germans](https://whiteresister.com/index_php/archive/1208-video-ukrainians-welcome-hitler-as-liberator-1941/) as [liberators.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJPuLXpkASg)
>Well it's easy to say after the fact
Hitler explicitly gave his generals, who were utterly astonished, *a hold order* to allow Britain and France time to evacuate. So it’s easy to say during the fact.
>but the attempt to make peace with Britain made a lot of sense at the time.
Of course! It’s not Hitler’s fault he thought he was up against white men and not jews wearing white skin suits. It’s not his fault he thought actual human beings were his opponents, instead of subhuman demons. It’s genuinely not his fault that he thought he could appeal to the reason and sapience innate to a human being. He was simply fighting nonhumans and didn’t realize it until it was too late.
But it was still a mistake.
>The Einsatzgruppen were specifically targeting and mass murdering Jews in the field
Still have that hoax internalized, huh.
>So on the Jews, Hitler (or I should say: Heinrich Himmler) gets a 10/10.
*They conquered the world completely and permanently* as a direct result of Hitler not exterminating them. So no, he gets a negative infinity out of ten. If Germany had slaughtered every single jew in the lands it conquered, *even if they still hadn’t won the war*, jews wouldn’t have the power they do today.
>it was ineffective / too soft.
It was, though. Their eternal enemy was *purposely kept alive* during a total war scenario in which Germans were being slaughtered.
>You're right, I regret that I singled out Americans and I apologize.
The entire damn war was a mistake. Everyone should have done better. Yet here we are, still arguing over how *much* of our enemies we should leave alive. Can we ever learn?