It's not ideal. But he can say whatever shit he wants about racism and it doesn't ultimately matter. As the leader of the Catholic Church, what matters is whether he allows further liberalization of Church dogma, which based on previous statements he's made, I doubt he's going to do. He's against ordaining women and he's against the gay agenda, particularly as it pertains to children.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
1 year ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
1 year ago
2 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+2Score on mirror
)
2 children
He literally said he wants a synodal church today. They conveniently neglected to caption that one phrase.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
1 year ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
1 child
Source?
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 year ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
His speech on the balcony, when he was speaking Italian.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 year ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
1 child
The heck is a Synodal Church? Isnt that basically just Sedevacantism but with extra steps?
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
1 year ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
1 child
It's democracy and free masonry in the church. It inverts church hierarchy, vesting authority to govern and define doctrine and dogma in a big, interfaith committee comprised of a bunch of fags and yentas. It's a popular heresy in Germany and South America, right now.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 year ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
Wouldnt it essentially be non-binding on the faithful because it wouldnt have any authority that Christ invested in St. Peter?
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message