You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)
I am in complete disagreement.
The idea that our ancestors from before the indo Europeans were in any way matriarchal is more than likely an utter fabrication invented by jews. Yeah, if my frame of reference for all of european culture were "the birth of venus" painting, I could also lie and say that it was "clearly a matriarchy".
No. I highly doubt they were matriarchal. Figurines of women prove literally nothing. Women remained more common to paint than men for... how long? Most painters and sculptors are male. Men think women are beautiful. Men paint and sculpt women more than men. Actually, if it were a matriarchal society, I presume that there would be more sculptures of men left behind.
But there's 0 proof that the Neolithic Europeans were matriarchal. Furthermore, societies that are descended almost exclusively from roughly the exact same people, mainly in the levant, are extremely patriarchal. If societies descended from those people directly are patriarchal, then what are the chances that any of them were ever matriarchal. Plus: the Neolithic Europeans were highly successful and industrious. Matriarchal societies aren't like this (Africa, jews, ahem), and the reason for that is because if a matriarchal society has arisen, it means the men are inferior to the women and do not raise the next generation. Men are stronger than women and serve as protectors. If women have to take the dominant roll, it means that the sexes aren't playing in the same court, and lack of cooperation means no building a better society. This behavior is almost exclusive to niggers. Even jews are only "matriarchal" because of, well, playing lawyer ball with God as is typical.
The idea that our ancestors from before the indo Europeans were in any way matriarchal is more than likely an utter fabrication invented by jews. Yeah, if my frame of reference for all of european culture were "the birth of venus" painting, I could also lie and say that it was "clearly a matriarchy".
No. I highly doubt they were matriarchal. Figurines of women prove literally nothing. Women remained more common to paint than men for... how long? Most painters and sculptors are male. Men think women are beautiful. Men paint and sculpt women more than men. Actually, if it were a matriarchal society, I presume that there would be more sculptures of men left behind.
But there's 0 proof that the Neolithic Europeans were matriarchal. Furthermore, societies that are descended almost exclusively from roughly the exact same people, mainly in the levant, are extremely patriarchal. If societies descended from those people directly are patriarchal, then what are the chances that any of them were ever matriarchal. Plus: the Neolithic Europeans were highly successful and industrious. Matriarchal societies aren't like this (Africa, jews, ahem), and the reason for that is because if a matriarchal society has arisen, it means the men are inferior to the women and do not raise the next generation. Men are stronger than women and serve as protectors. If women have to take the dominant roll, it means that the sexes aren't playing in the same court, and lack of cooperation means no building a better society. This behavior is almost exclusive to niggers. Even jews are only "matriarchal" because of, well, playing lawyer ball with God as is typical.
There was never a matriarchy in Europe.