the nasty conjuration on the left looks like it was assembled by some negro tribals
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
5 comments:
I am in complete disagreement.
The idea that our ancestors from before the indo Europeans were in any way matriarchal is more than likely an utter fabrication invented by jews. Yeah, if my frame of reference for all of european culture were "the birth of venus" painting, I could also lie and say that it was "clearly a matriarchy".
No. I highly doubt they were matriarchal. Figurines of women prove literally nothing. Women remained more common to paint than men for... how long? Most painters and sculptors are male. Men think women are beautiful. Men paint and sculpt women more than men. Actually, if it were a matriarchal society, I presume that there would be more sculptures of men left behind.
But there's 0 proof that the Neolithic Europeans were matriarchal. Furthermore, societies that are descended almost exclusively from roughly the exact same people, mainly in the levant, are extremely patriarchal. If societies descended from those people directly are patriarchal, then what are the chances that any of them were ever matriarchal. Plus: the Neolithic Europeans were highly successful and industrious. Matriarchal societies aren't like this (Africa, jews, ahem), and the reason for that is because if a matriarchal society has arisen, it means the men are inferior to the women and do not raise the next generation. Men are stronger than women and serve as protectors. If women have to take the dominant roll, it means that the sexes aren't playing in the same court, and lack of cooperation means no building a better society. This behavior is almost exclusive to niggers. Even jews are only "matriarchal" because of, well, playing lawyer ball with God as is typical.
There was never a matriarchy in Europe.
The idea that our ancestors from before the indo Europeans were in any way matriarchal is more than likely an utter fabrication invented by jews. Yeah, if my frame of reference for all of european culture were "the birth of venus" painting, I could also lie and say that it was "clearly a matriarchy".
No. I highly doubt they were matriarchal. Figurines of women prove literally nothing. Women remained more common to paint than men for... how long? Most painters and sculptors are male. Men think women are beautiful. Men paint and sculpt women more than men. Actually, if it were a matriarchal society, I presume that there would be more sculptures of men left behind.
But there's 0 proof that the Neolithic Europeans were matriarchal. Furthermore, societies that are descended almost exclusively from roughly the exact same people, mainly in the levant, are extremely patriarchal. If societies descended from those people directly are patriarchal, then what are the chances that any of them were ever matriarchal. Plus: the Neolithic Europeans were highly successful and industrious. Matriarchal societies aren't like this (Africa, jews, ahem), and the reason for that is because if a matriarchal society has arisen, it means the men are inferior to the women and do not raise the next generation. Men are stronger than women and serve as protectors. If women have to take the dominant roll, it means that the sexes aren't playing in the same court, and lack of cooperation means no building a better society. This behavior is almost exclusive to niggers. Even jews are only "matriarchal" because of, well, playing lawyer ball with God as is typical.
There was never a matriarchy in Europe.
Toast message
"Who will have the courage to spit on the gypsy? Who will have the virtue to scorn the Turk? To proclaim from the roof top that the wrong side won the dung war? Ezra Pound had it right, this is not a war between light and dark, it is a war between light and mud."
https://xcancel.com/hope_pead/status/1780630552141341020