1 year ago18 points(+0/-0/+18Score on mirror)2 children
Whiteness can be determined by a genetic test, dummy. People of every race on this planet claim to be "jewish", so jewishness is in fact a social construct if there ever was one.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
EMJ has had twisted views on race for a long time. Even more bizarrely, he seems to accept ethnicity as real while peddling the notion of race as a 'category of the mind' or social construct.
Yet 'Whiteness' and 'blackness' are clearly ascriptive identities. Any complications can be resolved through genetic tests. It doesn't matter whether you identify as 'White' or 'black'. EMJ, like many Whites, probably doesn't identify as 'White', but other people will identify him as White nevertheless. Even if he wore a shirt that read: 'I do not identify as White', it would make no difference. If he was to commit a crime wearing said shirt, only a fool would believe that the media wouldn't report that a White man committed a crime.
Whereas 'Jew' and, in particular, Jones' own 'Catholic' are identities that practically anyone can take up. Both have members of all races. Of course, yids are much more restrictive on who they let in. Nevertheless, if rabbis were willing to accept a Martian, even a little green Martian man could become a 'Jew'.
Funnily, there are plenty of Filipinos and Hispanics more Catholic than EMJ, who is foul-mouthed and deeply heterodox, for instance, in his taking Hegel and the Socratics seriously when many of their views contradict Christianity. Aristotle, for instance, believed that the cosmos was eternal and thus was never created, having, in a sense, skipped creation, which blatantly contradicts Genesis.
This is a man who believes that Africa is only backwards relative to the Whites because it is not Catholic enough. That Africa would easily surpass the Whites if it became ardently Catholic. If Africa became ardently Catholic, he would simply say that they still aren't ardent enough and that they would eventually surpass the Whites if they simply became more ardent still.
This is a man who believes that the only problem with yids is their religion. If they convert, they thus suddenly cease being a problem. So they should be forcibly converted. You are not allowed to say that the problem is essential (e.g. biological or metaphysical), because, if it is, conversion is no solution and eradication remains the only one that is irreversible. After all, we can't change their genes or their souls, we can only change their religion or eradicate their genes and souls from this plane of existence. But EMJ won't entertain eradication because... you guessed it, Catholicism.
He spouts all kinds of other things that are similarly contrary to reason and science, but his narratives on groids and yids are the two that I can most easily recall.
It is religion that is the social construct or 'category of the mind'.
I am Catholic if I *believe*, belief being a mental operation, in Catholicism. By contrast, it doesn't matter what I or anyone else believes regarding 'Whiteness' or 'blackness'. It would still be the case that I have a race even if no man believed that I did: an objective, omnisicient observer such as God would still say that I am part of a race even if every man believed otherwise.
Even a fully mixed world would be one of races, with everyone sitting on a spectrum somewhere between them. If we mix red and yellow, we get orange, but it would be blatantly false to say that red and yellow do not exist because there is orange, even if no red or yellow exists at that point in time nor ever again after that time. For if we could unmix all that is orange, red and yellow would indubitably exist again at that point in time: orange proves rather than disproves the existence of red and yellow; the mixtures prove rather than disprove the existence of the pures.
I've heard his "category of the mind" assertion and I thought it was amazing how backwards he got it. Catholicism, or any other religion, is a "category of the mind". Race is a fact of biology that has nothing to do with belief. EMJ is a screwball on many levels.
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)1 child
universalism. everyone can be saved. it's a sneaky form of egalitarianism built into Christianity. one of the 3 major weaknesses of the religion, from a practical position. if we want to start winning and stop losing we need to be honest about our weaknesses.
Christianity has changed a lot in the zeitgeist. People were Christian when they waged wars of expansion and colonialism. What is really Christianity? Its changing with the times around it, it seems to me.
1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
If we read this literally, EMJ is saying:
* 'Blacks' are a race
* 'Jews' are a race
* 'Whites' are *not* a race
* 'Blacks' 'can be tribal'
* 'Jews' 'can be tribal'
* 'Whites' can *not* 'be tribal'
This is such a silly answer to Lilly's question and is the exact answer that a yid would provide ('we are good, groids are our 'allies' [i.e. useful idiots], Whites are the enemy'). For someone ardently anti-Jewish (he vehemently opposes their religion, but he is not 'anti-Semitic' because he doesn't oppose their race in the slightest), he sure comes off here like a yid.
EMJ's nonsense here makes sense only from a yiddish supremacist mindset and no other: one group and their useful idiots have a 'right' that the other group - which, relatedly, they view as an enemy - does not. Since ethnocentrists always defeat other types of actors in simulations, even when they begin in a very weak position, it makes sense that the yids want this force multiplier for themselves and their useful idiots and not for their enemies. They do not need to consciously understand that they are ethnocentric - just as ants would not even though they are at peace with their colony while they are at war against others - but ethnocentrism is in their nature, and is part and parcel of why the yid is nigh-omnipotent in today's world.
Now why has EMJ internalized his enemy's argument for the destruction of his *own* race? Is there some yiddish ancestry in the woodpile that makes him a whiteface-wearer, subversive, even if only instinctively and unconsciously, rather than White?
Remember what Doug Wilson and Will Spencer, both whitefaced-yids prominent in Christian nationalism who all of a sudden revealed their 'Jewishness' once Hitler began to be rehabilitated in Christian nationalist circles, did to Christian nationalism? They crashed it.
The yid tries to control everything; if something that he controls falls too far out of his grasp, he will rug-pull it. Why do you think that BLM is so quiet now? Because too many of their followers favour Palestine in the Israel-Hamas conflict. Their leader, Alicia Garza (birth name: Alicia Schwartz), is a blackfaced-yid, and their biggest donors are yids. The yids simply rug-pulled BLM.
>The yid tries to control everything; if something that he controls falls too far out of his grasp, he will rug-pull it. Why do you think that BLM is so quiet now? Because too many of their followers favour Palestine in the Israel-Hamas conflict. Their leader, Alicia Garza (birth name: Alicia Schwartz), is a blackfaced-yid, and their biggest donors are yids. The yids simply rug-pulled BLM.
Very good warning here. Young White Nationalists should take notes. You Have Noticed Much.
But a tribe is very literally a social construct....
I don't mean that to say that there wasn't a material reality like blood or geography that made the formation of any given tribe inevitable, or that a group of random people got together one day and said "let's make up some fake thing called 'The Saxons' or 'The Algonquian'" or anything like that. Just that it's a group of people that agree on something, and that agreement binds them together.
You know, if the members of the tribe didn't agree they were a tribe, they wouldn't be.
I mean, everything we do besides the basic biological functions is a "social construct", being social creatures is what makes us human. I don't get why people talk about things being a "social construct" as if that's the same as the thing not existing.
The guy who posted that is probably wearing clothes. What a fool! Doesn't he realize nudity based shame is a social construct, and thus doesn't actually exist and is meaningless!?
Kike Frauds such as u/I-Am-Orlando wishes he could be as much of a lying propagandist as Piers Morgan here. Always terraforming TheDonald with your bullshit Republican Incorporated curated jew approved headlines you fucking faggot.
Any self respecting White man doesn't need lying synagogue of satan anti-Christ Kikes dictating his politics, headlines, or news stories to him. Your propaganda will carry consequences for you in hell. When you die we will bury you in manure at your funeral and write your eulogy what a lying terraforming propagandist scumbag you were.
I respect E Michael jones but he's like missing half of the puzzle like every other Christcuck
is well educated on jews and their problems, but wouldn't fucking admit that the difference between US and NIGGERS are so staggering they're practically not even human
i can get him simping over latrinos because latrinos are not as caustic as blacks (but they still are a criminal, mongrelized bastards) but simping over niggers makes you borderline jewish in my book (just look at the daily niggerporn spammer, only a sick demented jewish mind can get off to sheboon pornography, that stuff is so disgusting it literally gives me psy damage)
Aka three (tri) being (be)...a tripartite division. Nature divides all into each one. A jew divides gentiles against one another, hence establishing a tripartite division aka tribe.
Wenn zwei sich streiten (white vs black) freut sich der dritte (jew)...aka a jew tricking gentiles into tribulation/trouble/tribe.
>black and white
White implies pure light; black implies absence of light...being implies in-between white and black aka within the visible spectrum of light, hence human (hue of man; color of man).
Hold your "white" skin against the sun...see the difference? That's because color cannot be pure (white), since beings are casting shades, hence absence aka ab (away from) + esse (being)...there's the absence of light (black).
>social construct
Social/sekw (to follow) + construct (structured together)...a jew utilizes suggestion to structure consenting gentiles together into followers.
Nature generates each being apart from one another, which establishes the need for each to resist the wanted temptation to follow one another.
A jew resists following, while tempting gentiles to follow orders and ignore resisting.
>E. Michael Jones
A catholic aka cathode...kata (down) + hodos (way); as opposed to anode...ana (up) + hodos (way).
Each being (life) wields the free will of choice to go up or down the way (inception towards death). A jew resists the temptation to follow down the way (cathode); hence struggling up the way (anode).
The natural order implies a current entering at anode (inception) and leaving at cathode (death) of each device (life). A jew suggests artificial currency to tempt gentiles to follow along natural current.