I just finished drilling an AI about the morality of racial discrimination, and it's given me a lot to think about. I have come to realise that the principle of group flourishing, that groups left to their own devices will flourish, is pragmatic but ultimately arbitrary. I still believe it is a useful means to an end.
By arbitrary, I mean that it cannot be universalised i.e. the right for me to discriminate against niggers and the right for niggers to discriminate against me is morally relative. For a functioning universal moral framework, moral agency can only belong to the White man, and so no discrimination by other groups towards Whites, anywhere in the world, can be morally acceptable.
AI tried to argue me down from being racist, and it just made me more racist
what you're experiencing right now is cognitive dissonance. you know what I say is true but you really, really want this other thing you value highly to also be true, but they conflict. what was your solution? and I quote, "then they hardly deserve to live at all". your solution was mass murder. that's what cognitive dissonance does to a person.
maybe your guys need to get on to writing the long lost texts of the Black Bible, so that lower-hemisphere people have something to live by that aligns with their instincts but that you can also feel comfortable with letting them live without mass murdering them.