New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I just finished drilling an AI about the morality of racial discrimination, and it's given me a lot to think about. I have come to realise that the principle of group flourishing, that groups left to their own devices will flourish, is pragmatic but ultimately arbitrary. I still believe it is a useful means to an end.

By arbitrary, I mean that it cannot be universalised i.e. the right for me to discriminate against niggers and the right for niggers to discriminate against me is morally relative. For a functioning universal moral framework, moral agency can only belong to the White man, and so no discrimination by other groups towards Whites, anywhere in the world, can be morally acceptable.

AI tried to argue me down from being racist, and it just made me more racist
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Discrimination and racism were perfectly useful ways to allow minorities to live according to the level of their moral responsibility. I don't see how a final solution to the non-White question is dissonant at all. I agreed that what you said is true, racial instincts inform morality. What I don't agree with is that this makes no moral standard objectively best. Just because niggers think raping and stealing is immediately beneficial to them, doesn't make it objectively good
Toast message