New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Back in the 90s, everyone was so concerned about the "ozone layer" and they made movies about how the surface of the earth would be unlivable because our CFCs (freon) would pollute the upper atmosphere and make the ozone layer go away and that would irradiate the earth with the sun's rays or somesuch.

I was a young physics student at the time. So I ran the equations on how gasses behave. I plugged in the unit mass for freon and lo and behold -- there is no way freon was getting to the upper atmosphere. Even if you somehow managed to maintain an updraft for an extended period of time, it wouldn't reach the upper atmosphere and even if some of it did, it would almost instantly fall back to the lower atmosphere.

Not to mention, the amount of free CFCs in the atmosphere was ridiculously low. Suppose that the ozone layer were at ground level, how often would a freon radical interact with a free oxygen radical? Almost never.

Anyway, you want to know the REAL reason why CFCs became enemy #1? It's simple, really: The patent was about to expire, and 3M was going to lose BILLIONS of dollars unless they could get everyone to switch to their "new" and less efficient refrigerants.

It was a big wake up call. If you read something in the newspaper, or see it on the TV, or there is a movie made about it, it's almost definitely fake.

Since the 90s, I've been exonerated on countless issues like that.

And you know the microplastic thing? It's the same story, all over again.

I've actually read the scientific papers regarding microplastics. They're finding this stuff (and no one is bothering actually explaining what it is) everywhere. It's in the water, in the air, in the soil, and in our bodies. It's even in our blood.

And you know what happens if you get exposed to microplastics?

Absolutely nothing.

Why are jews pushing microplastics all of a sudden? Because we know exactly what DOES cause the health issues we see all around us, and the last thing they want is for them to be revealed as poisoning our food supply intentionally.

RFK Jr has just banned all artificial food colorings from our food, just like Europe has done for some time. Why? Because some of these guys actually cause harm even in low doses. There's literally NO reason to put this in our food, except to make them more commercially desirable. If I had a food factory (not yet, but one day hopefully) I would NEVER put artificial food coloring in anything. The simple reason is I would NEVER put anything in food that I sold unless I was absolutely certain it would improve the life of the people I was selling the food to. That's because I am a white person with compassion and empathy.

As a food producer right now (cattle, sheep, chickens, eggs) I don't use antibiotics, antiparasitics, artificial fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, etc... Does that mean some of my animals get sick and die? Of course. Am I going to doctor a sick animal and then sell it as food? **HELL NO.** The sick animal is going to end up as fertilizer or dog food, period. I am not going to eat it. I won't feed it to my family, and I wouldn't even give it to my worst enemies. Given how bad our livestock industry is (everyone knows that you can buy all the sick animals you want at the local sale barn) I'm not even going to sell them.

Microplastics are a deception. There is NO evidence that they cause any harm. We didn't even know they existed until a few years ago, because we had no definition for them nor did we even have a way to test if they are in stuff.

Likely, what is happening is some chemical companies have a new formula for plastics that they want us to start using, because the current set of plastics have been ENORMOUSLY successful. I don't think my form of agriculture would even be possible without nylon, for instance, and a large number of other plastics. Do you think I can use glass and steel where I am currently using plastics? Do you really think your 5 gallon buckets made of steel are going to be near as useful or cheap as my plastic 5 gallon buckets that I use all the time for all kinds of things?

Not only that, they are meant to deceive us and distract us from the real harms that we are exposed to every day by jews who run our food industry and the medical industry and INTENTIONALLY make us sick so that they can make more money.

DO NOT BE DISTRACTED!
You must log in or sign up to comment
18 comments:
Knight_Of_Saint_John on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Microplastics are a deception. There is NO evidence that they cause any harm

The vaccine is safe and effective goy! Trust ze government and consume your daily dose of vegetable oils and GMO corn, just like ZOG intended!
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
How much do the jews pay you to try and keep us focused on microplastics, while we KNOW that jews are poisoning our food and medical industry?
bcfromfl on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
There exist plenty of scientific inquiries like the one I've linked below, outlining the endocrine disruption of microplastics. I'm not sure it's accurate to say that there is no evidence they cause harm. I would rather err on the side of caution, myself, where possible: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9885170/
Uberen on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Read the paper before sharing it or you look like a retard.

> This review warns about the accumulation of MPs in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Furthermore, it implies that studies need to be carried out to deeply understand the action mechanism of MPs, nanoplastics [NPs], and associated chemicals in aquatic and terrestrial biota and their long-term detrimental consequences on the mammalian endocrine system.

Edit: just read the conclusion if you are lazy

> Endocrine toxicity induced by MPs is an emerging issue, despite the subject being rarely documented
bcfromfl on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Dude, I'm fully aware of what this paper says. Stop with the insults -- I threw no shade in your direction. I was simply adding to the discussion.

All I said was that I would rather err on the side of caution, which is a prudent course of action given the questions which have been raised. I don't know if I am right or not. Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are right? Very few things in this world are black and white, and it's a dangerous proposition to assume that things always fit into nice neat little boxes that your mind conveniently creates for them.

Members occasionally post on this message board lamenting that there are very rarely any good discussions here, or civility. Your response to my post is precisely the reason why this board has crumbled over the past few years.

I will avoid your posts in the future.
Weematanyeh on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The only consideration I take for plastics is when it comes to heating them up, I avoid plastic in the microwave when possible. I read something about how the black plastics that are made to be heat resistant have nasty stuff in them.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Heating up plastics may be bad, depending on the temperature.

If you're just warming a bowl of soup, you're probably fine.
HerrBBQ on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
There's certainly not unquestionable evidence that microplastics are detrimental, but there's enough evidence to warrant avoiding plastics if possible. If "they" want to eventually sell a new kind of plastic, how is it going to solve the microplastic problem? I'm just not really seeing a believable conspiracy here. Applying Occam's razor, microplastics are probably just bad for us, so it's probably best to avoid plastic or be careful how we handle plastic.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> there's certainly not unquestionable evidence

Let me translate into language a scientist would appreciate: "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE"

> there's enough evidence to warrant avoiding plastics if possible

What evidence? What ACTUAL harm does any plastic cause?

Meanwhile, we KNOW that a high carb diet and medicines ARE causing actual harm!

> If "they" want to eventually sell a new kind of plastic, how is it going to solve the microplastic problem

What problem? The problem that doesn't exist because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE of it?

New plastics made with new formulas with chemicals that are even more detrimental... you do the math.

> Applying Occam's razor, microplastics are probably just bad for us, so it's probably best to avoid plastic or be careful how we handle plastic.

Applying Occam's razor, as you said earlier "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE". Since there is no evidence, drop it altogether since it is irrelevant to anything. That's how Occam's razor works.

To wit: Suppose I had a theory of how the planets orbit the sun and I added "And I had cereal this morning." The fact that I had cereal has nothing to do with planets orbiting or not orbiting the sun. Therefore, drop it.

Since THERE IS NO EVIDENCE that microplastics cause harm -- drop it. It's irrelevant. Focus on the things that DO cause harm.
HerrBBQ on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>What problem?

I'm not saying there definitely is a problem but I'm saying since they're pushing a "plastics bad" narrative, and you believe this is because they want to push a new plastic product, then that necessitates a "new plastic good" narrative, in other words, their new plastic "solves the problem", whether it's a real problem or not.

The total lack of rational thinking in your posts just supports my theory that Mormons are all retards.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Nice, not only are you using ad hominem, but you are using the fallacy of composition.

Keep going, I am sure you can think of more logical fallacies to hurl my way. I enjoy exposing you nitwits for what you are.
HerrBBQ on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> Ad hominem

Ad hominem wasn't part of my argument, it was me insulting you at the end.

> fallacy of composition

When X person does something retarded and then someone notes that "X people are retards", it's a figure of speech, and it also wasn't part of my actual argument.

Like most midwits who just learned about logical fallacies, you think identifying them makes you some kind of debate genius. You're not. You're just a fucking retarded Mormon.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> You're just a fucking retarded Mormon.

Well, I have five kids. I got a physics degree, though. And we don't call ourselves mormon anymore because we're not loyal to Mormon and never were.

Anyway, you completely avoided the arguments I made and now you want to argue about whether or not you are justified making ad hominem attacks on me for citing the INDISPUTABLE FACT that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT MICROPLASTICS CAUSE HARM.

OK, have fun with that.
mommamany on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I haven't done extensive research on plastics, but there have been studies that phalates and such act as estrogen mimics and can be disruptive to hormones, especially in children. To be abundantly cautious, we do use stainless steel, cast iron and glass in place of plastic. Of course a lot of our food comes wrapped in plastic (i.e. meat) but I can only do so much. If it's possible to avoid, especially in health and beauty products that go directly on the skin and are endocrine disrupters, I certainly do. I have too many children I would be heartbroken to see suffer the ill effects of infertility. We also avoid soy for this reason as well.


We also avoid high carb diets, processed food, etc so this is just one thing that is a simple choice for us to do. I hadn't considered keeping animal feed/waterers in non plastic, and agree that's unrealistic!
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
phthalates != microplastics

Two entirely different things
mommamany on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Sorry I don't know what != means.

This is from online: Phthalates are not microplastics themselves, but they can be found adhered to or released from microplastics. Microplastics are tiny bits of plastic less than 5 mm in length, while phthalates are chemicals often used as plasticizers to make plastics more flexible and durable.

I'd rather stay away from all of it. I'm not sure why microplastics are a hill to die on. I don't think most people are saying do away with all microplastics (which is unrealistic, as you've said they're everywhere) but what is the harm in others trying to limit them, among other choices to help improve their health?
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
"!=" is computer speak for "=/=" or "not equals".

I'm not dying on the microplastic hill. I'm not dying on any hill.

I'm just telling you guys that there is no science behind the microplastic nonsense just like there's no science behind global warming AKA climate change and the ozone fraud.

Stop being idiots and believing whatever the jew media tells you. Read their sources, learn how to interpret papers, and then call them out on the BS they throw at you.

You'll notice there's two types of people who respond to me:

1. "I am going to avoid them anyway because I don't trust the science" -- perfectly healthy and normal reaction, but avoids the question entirely and is able to be manipulated in the future.
2. "You dirty jew / mormon / whatever you are an idiot I hate you and I'm going to spew foul language because I don't know how logic works" -- comes with the territory everytime you expose another jew lie.
Toast message