Back in the 90s, everyone was so concerned about the "ozone layer" and they made movies about how the surface of the earth would be unlivable because our CFCs (freon) would pollute the upper atmosphere and make the ozone layer go away and that would irradiate the earth with the sun's rays or somesuch.
I was a young physics student at the time. So I ran the equations on how gasses behave. I plugged in the unit mass for freon and lo and behold -- there is no way freon was getting to the upper atmosphere. Even if you somehow managed to maintain an updraft for an extended period of time, it wouldn't reach the upper atmosphere and even if some of it did, it would almost instantly fall back to the lower atmosphere.
Not to mention, the amount of free CFCs in the atmosphere was ridiculously low. Suppose that the ozone layer were at ground level, how often would a freon radical interact with a free oxygen radical? Almost never.
Anyway, you want to know the REAL reason why CFCs became enemy #1? It's simple, really: The patent was about to expire, and 3M was going to lose BILLIONS of dollars unless they could get everyone to switch to their "new" and less efficient refrigerants.
It was a big wake up call. If you read something in the newspaper, or see it on the TV, or there is a movie made about it, it's almost definitely fake.
Since the 90s, I've been exonerated on countless issues like that.
And you know the microplastic thing? It's the same story, all over again.
I've actually read the scientific papers regarding microplastics. They're finding this stuff (and no one is bothering actually explaining what it is) everywhere. It's in the water, in the air, in the soil, and in our bodies. It's even in our blood.
And you know what happens if you get exposed to microplastics?
Absolutely nothing.
Why are jews pushing microplastics all of a sudden? Because we know exactly what DOES cause the health issues we see all around us, and the last thing they want is for them to be revealed as poisoning our food supply intentionally.
RFK Jr has just banned all artificial food colorings from our food, just like Europe has done for some time. Why? Because some of these guys actually cause harm even in low doses. There's literally NO reason to put this in our food, except to make them more commercially desirable. If I had a food factory (not yet, but one day hopefully) I would NEVER put artificial food coloring in anything. The simple reason is I would NEVER put anything in food that I sold unless I was absolutely certain it would improve the life of the people I was selling the food to. That's because I am a white person with compassion and empathy.
As a food producer right now (cattle, sheep, chickens, eggs) I don't use antibiotics, antiparasitics, artificial fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, etc... Does that mean some of my animals get sick and die? Of course. Am I going to doctor a sick animal and then sell it as food? **HELL NO.** The sick animal is going to end up as fertilizer or dog food, period. I am not going to eat it. I won't feed it to my family, and I wouldn't even give it to my worst enemies. Given how bad our livestock industry is (everyone knows that you can buy all the sick animals you want at the local sale barn) I'm not even going to sell them.
Microplastics are a deception. There is NO evidence that they cause any harm. We didn't even know they existed until a few years ago, because we had no definition for them nor did we even have a way to test if they are in stuff.
Likely, what is happening is some chemical companies have a new formula for plastics that they want us to start using, because the current set of plastics have been ENORMOUSLY successful. I don't think my form of agriculture would even be possible without nylon, for instance, and a large number of other plastics. Do you think I can use glass and steel where I am currently using plastics? Do you really think your 5 gallon buckets made of steel are going to be near as useful or cheap as my plastic 5 gallon buckets that I use all the time for all kinds of things?
Not only that, they are meant to deceive us and distract us from the real harms that we are exposed to every day by jews who run our food industry and the medical industry and INTENTIONALLY make us sick so that they can make more money.
DO NOT BE DISTRACTED!
I was a young physics student at the time. So I ran the equations on how gasses behave. I plugged in the unit mass for freon and lo and behold -- there is no way freon was getting to the upper atmosphere. Even if you somehow managed to maintain an updraft for an extended period of time, it wouldn't reach the upper atmosphere and even if some of it did, it would almost instantly fall back to the lower atmosphere.
Not to mention, the amount of free CFCs in the atmosphere was ridiculously low. Suppose that the ozone layer were at ground level, how often would a freon radical interact with a free oxygen radical? Almost never.
Anyway, you want to know the REAL reason why CFCs became enemy #1? It's simple, really: The patent was about to expire, and 3M was going to lose BILLIONS of dollars unless they could get everyone to switch to their "new" and less efficient refrigerants.
It was a big wake up call. If you read something in the newspaper, or see it on the TV, or there is a movie made about it, it's almost definitely fake.
Since the 90s, I've been exonerated on countless issues like that.
And you know the microplastic thing? It's the same story, all over again.
I've actually read the scientific papers regarding microplastics. They're finding this stuff (and no one is bothering actually explaining what it is) everywhere. It's in the water, in the air, in the soil, and in our bodies. It's even in our blood.
And you know what happens if you get exposed to microplastics?
Absolutely nothing.
Why are jews pushing microplastics all of a sudden? Because we know exactly what DOES cause the health issues we see all around us, and the last thing they want is for them to be revealed as poisoning our food supply intentionally.
RFK Jr has just banned all artificial food colorings from our food, just like Europe has done for some time. Why? Because some of these guys actually cause harm even in low doses. There's literally NO reason to put this in our food, except to make them more commercially desirable. If I had a food factory (not yet, but one day hopefully) I would NEVER put artificial food coloring in anything. The simple reason is I would NEVER put anything in food that I sold unless I was absolutely certain it would improve the life of the people I was selling the food to. That's because I am a white person with compassion and empathy.
As a food producer right now (cattle, sheep, chickens, eggs) I don't use antibiotics, antiparasitics, artificial fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, etc... Does that mean some of my animals get sick and die? Of course. Am I going to doctor a sick animal and then sell it as food? **HELL NO.** The sick animal is going to end up as fertilizer or dog food, period. I am not going to eat it. I won't feed it to my family, and I wouldn't even give it to my worst enemies. Given how bad our livestock industry is (everyone knows that you can buy all the sick animals you want at the local sale barn) I'm not even going to sell them.
Microplastics are a deception. There is NO evidence that they cause any harm. We didn't even know they existed until a few years ago, because we had no definition for them nor did we even have a way to test if they are in stuff.
Likely, what is happening is some chemical companies have a new formula for plastics that they want us to start using, because the current set of plastics have been ENORMOUSLY successful. I don't think my form of agriculture would even be possible without nylon, for instance, and a large number of other plastics. Do you think I can use glass and steel where I am currently using plastics? Do you really think your 5 gallon buckets made of steel are going to be near as useful or cheap as my plastic 5 gallon buckets that I use all the time for all kinds of things?
Not only that, they are meant to deceive us and distract us from the real harms that we are exposed to every day by jews who run our food industry and the medical industry and INTENTIONALLY make us sick so that they can make more money.
DO NOT BE DISTRACTED!
Let me translate into language a scientist would appreciate: "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE"
> there's enough evidence to warrant avoiding plastics if possible
What evidence? What ACTUAL harm does any plastic cause?
Meanwhile, we KNOW that a high carb diet and medicines ARE causing actual harm!
> If "they" want to eventually sell a new kind of plastic, how is it going to solve the microplastic problem
What problem? The problem that doesn't exist because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE of it?
New plastics made with new formulas with chemicals that are even more detrimental... you do the math.
> Applying Occam's razor, microplastics are probably just bad for us, so it's probably best to avoid plastic or be careful how we handle plastic.
Applying Occam's razor, as you said earlier "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE". Since there is no evidence, drop it altogether since it is irrelevant to anything. That's how Occam's razor works.
To wit: Suppose I had a theory of how the planets orbit the sun and I added "And I had cereal this morning." The fact that I had cereal has nothing to do with planets orbiting or not orbiting the sun. Therefore, drop it.
Since THERE IS NO EVIDENCE that microplastics cause harm -- drop it. It's irrelevant. Focus on the things that DO cause harm.
I'm not saying there definitely is a problem but I'm saying since they're pushing a "plastics bad" narrative, and you believe this is because they want to push a new plastic product, then that necessitates a "new plastic good" narrative, in other words, their new plastic "solves the problem", whether it's a real problem or not.
The total lack of rational thinking in your posts just supports my theory that Mormons are all retards.
Keep going, I am sure you can think of more logical fallacies to hurl my way. I enjoy exposing you nitwits for what you are.
Ad hominem wasn't part of my argument, it was me insulting you at the end.
> fallacy of composition
When X person does something retarded and then someone notes that "X people are retards", it's a figure of speech, and it also wasn't part of my actual argument.
Like most midwits who just learned about logical fallacies, you think identifying them makes you some kind of debate genius. You're not. You're just a fucking retarded Mormon.
Well, I have five kids. I got a physics degree, though. And we don't call ourselves mormon anymore because we're not loyal to Mormon and never were.
Anyway, you completely avoided the arguments I made and now you want to argue about whether or not you are justified making ad hominem attacks on me for citing the INDISPUTABLE FACT that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT MICROPLASTICS CAUSE HARM.
OK, have fun with that.