looks like this shabbos retard got hacked
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I've followed both of them for a long time and listened to most of their podcast, and I honestly have come to hold the suspicion that they are possibly bad faith agents, albeit *very* subtle ones.
Hot take, I know—but the devil is in the details. The whole podcast does ultimately boil down to right wing deradicalization material, taken in its totality. It identifies the proper problems, speaks candidly about them, makes them agree with Christianity... and then directs all that energy into ineffectual solutions.
They claim explicitly that you can't take *real* action against the problems, under threat of damnation. Your Gary Plauchés, Uncle Teds, Luigi Mangiones of the world? Burning in hell, supposedly. And so will you, if you try to take any path forward that isn't voting harder or otherwise operating peacefully inside the doomed political structure. They touched on this point sparingly for a long time—wielding it like a cudgel when they did—before eventually going mask off with the Magdeburg Confession episode.
Furthermore, they very subtly enforce harmful subliminal messaging of omniracial unity among "brothers in Christ" in their rhetoric. They advocate for the separation of the biologically distinct races, while in the same breath planting a seed in your mind that subtly sabotages that goal. This notion of "spiritual" brotherhood among Christians of all races *can not do anything to help* White unity, in the best case. In the worst case, it will cause mental friction in Whites when they encounter a well spoken negro wearing a cross around his neck, even as they consciously affirm their desire to remove him.
Their social media presence is the less subtle gravy poured over it all. Woe conducts himself like a trainwreck—apparently either as a function of deliberation or extreme neuroticism. I, being redpilled, find myself subconsciously wanting to side with some of the normies he trades blows with. *Terrible* optics.
Corey is considerably more tactful, but the way he recently went off the rails in pointedly, needlessly stoking the fire of right wing religious infighting soured my opinion on him for good. That was the behavior of a person who does not truly prioritize White unity.
Lastly, we like to talk about trees and their fruit and all that. I spent a good amount of time lurking in the stone choir telegram channel, and eventually connecting with some of the users outside of it. I encountered mischlings, championing of "based" non-White friend groups, softcore consoomer culture, MAGAtards, yellow fever, and one guy who said he wouldn't deport his African best friend.
Not sure what color of fruit *that* is, but it sure ain't White.
I also have already noticed some air of helplessness or having to obey earthly authorities regarding doing anything productive to change our situation. What did they say in the Magdeburg Confession episode?
That’s troubling to hear about their listeners.
> What did they say in the Magdeburg Confession episode?
The subject of the episode was this (AI generated summary:)
> The Magdeburg Confession (1550) was a Lutheran document written by pastors in the German city of Magdeburg. It defended the right—and even duty—of lower civil authorities to resist a higher authority when that authority tried to destroy true religion and oppress consciences.
> Context:
> After Martin Luther's Reformation, tensions grew between Protestant territories and the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, a Catholic.
> In 1548, Charles imposed the Augsburg Interim, a temporary law forcing Protestants to adopt some Catholic practices while awaiting a final settlement.
> Most cities and leaders complied—but Magdeburg resisted, becoming a symbol of Protestant defiance.
> The Confession argued that when higher powers become tyrannical and attack the gospel, resistance is not rebellion—it is obedience to God.
> This document became an early foundation for later ideas of just resistance, influencing both political thought and religious liberty debates.
The main message of the episode was that this sort of event is the *only* context in which political violence can ever justifiably manifest within a Christian moral paradigm. It has to be:
* Purely in self defense
* Only as a very last resort
* Only if you are retaliating against certain core theological impositions, not material ones
They exhort the listeners to get politically active, try to sway your local government or get someone based elected, because elected officials are the only ones God has "endorsed" to exercise societal change by means of force.
Which of course, is suicidal fairytale rhetoric if you are aware of the extent of government corruption at all levels, the failed, extensively documented history of Whites trying to exercise change through peaceful protest/voting, and the remaining amount of time there is before demographic replacement has been completed.
But seemingly, the overwhelming majority of their listener base are not, nor do they want to be.