New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
52
posted 1 year ago by Coronelington on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +52Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
DT777 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Interesting. You should make this as a normal post since a lot of users have listened to or have heard of stone choir. I’ve only listened to about 10 episodes and don’t really have a problem with the idea that other races can be Christian, but their social media has given me pause.

I also have already noticed some air of helplessness or having to obey earthly authorities regarding doing anything productive to change our situation. What did they say in the Magdeburg Confession episode?

That’s troubling to hear about their listeners.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I probably will at some point, but for a standalone submission I want to make it an effortpost—further elaborate, clean it up, grab receipts, etc.

> What did they say in the Magdeburg Confession episode?

The subject of the episode was this (AI generated summary:)

> The Magdeburg Confession (1550) was a Lutheran document written by pastors in the German city of Magdeburg. It defended the right—and even duty—of lower civil authorities to resist a higher authority when that authority tried to destroy true religion and oppress consciences.

> Context:
> After Martin Luther's Reformation, tensions grew between Protestant territories and the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, a Catholic.

> In 1548, Charles imposed the Augsburg Interim, a temporary law forcing Protestants to adopt some Catholic practices while awaiting a final settlement.

> Most cities and leaders complied—but Magdeburg resisted, becoming a symbol of Protestant defiance.

> The Confession argued that when higher powers become tyrannical and attack the gospel, resistance is not rebellion—it is obedience to God.

> This document became an early foundation for later ideas of just resistance, influencing both political thought and religious liberty debates.

The main message of the episode was that this sort of event is the *only* context in which political violence can ever justifiably manifest within a Christian moral paradigm. It has to be:

* Purely in self defense

* Only as a very last resort

* Only if you are retaliating against certain core theological impositions, not material ones

They exhort the listeners to get politically active, try to sway your local government or get someone based elected, because elected officials are the only ones God has "endorsed" to exercise societal change by means of force.

Which of course, is suicidal fairytale rhetoric if you are aware of the extent of government corruption at all levels, the failed, extensively documented history of Whites trying to exercise change through peaceful protest/voting, and the remaining amount of time there is before demographic replacement has been completed.

But seemingly, the overwhelming majority of their listener base are not, nor do they want to be.
DT777 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Thank you for summarizing it. Yeah, that is a terrible position to take considering that the current government, and democracy itself, is a satanic inversion of God’s order. I wonder how much of it is covering their asses so they don’t get cancelled vs actual subversion. But that is bad and something that I have already picked up from the limited amount that I have listened to them.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Yeah it's hard to say with absolute certainty. Their holocaust episode got taken down, but the fact that they're allowed to exist (for years at this point) on every major streaming platform is suspicious unto itself. At the *very* least, this signals that the system doesn't consider their message to be any meaningful threat to its own existence, regardless of whether or not it is the actual architect behind it.

I wouldn't confidently label them active subversion agents, but there's now enough blood in the water that I'm leaving that card on the table in perpetuity.
Toast message