I wonder why proverbs 18:22 was edited
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I only found out in a discussion about "anullment vs divorce" ([post](https://padreperegrino.org/2025/04/annulment-correction-post/)). Basically, the redpill is that originally (pre Vatican II), divorce was not permitted, under any circumstances except "porneia", which doesn't mean "infidelity", but "incest".
So, if a partner cheats (or makes life unbearable, refuses sex, becomes a spiritual or physical harm to children), you are permitted to "separate", but not to remarry or "annull" or divorce.
What feminists want is push people towards to a false dichotomy:
- "You can never do anything, just pray": Means, you just have to stick with the abusive wife and can't do anything about it, reduces the attractiveness of marriage
- "You can always divorce": Reduces the sanctity of marriage
The true part is: you cannot divorce and remarry, but you can petition an ban on sacraments from the bishop (so that the person in question comes back) and you can separate yourself physically. On the other hand, the "annulments" or quasi-divorces are not valid according to Matthew 19:9, as Jesus didn't mean "infidelity". So if you pick the wrong wife - tough call, you only get to pick once, watch out who you marry. However, you also have the right to separate from your wife and get your wife banned from the sacraments as a disciplinary measure.
[Lots of redpills here, on how women can be kept in check, even without divorce.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDHpZxuoRfY) - as a note, I'm not married, but I just saw this post today
Those have also been removed in many (((masoretic text))) based translations, generally stuff referring to the Church of the OT being the same as the NT Church and prophecies of Christ have been altered.
Of course Jesus also said divorce is not good, but at least follow the law Moses gave.