New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You must log in or sign up to comment
17 comments:
13
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 2 children
If I were in Germany, and me and ~10000 others escaped to a new inhabited land, conquer and build it up, we'd be GLAD to disconnect ourselves from Germany as a state, while preserving German culture. In fact, it would even enhance the value of that culture. And when Germany struts around and demands half our crops and income as taxes forever, we'd be in severe conflict, war even. We'd hate Germany as Germans, and probably even rename our identity. And we'd thrive in having new liberties, and we'd make sure to keep them.

This doesn't mean we'd want niggers and shitskins. This doesn't mean we'd want to be controlled by jews and have our youth be corrupted with communist brainwash and degeneracy. NONE of that would have been the point. We didn't want more freedoms just so that we lose it all.

But after generations people forget and become complacent.
bobbacringo on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
It's interesting what you just said. The vast majority of white people in America can trace their ancestry to Deutschland, not England. However, at the time of the revolt in the 1770's - 1780's the population was majority English.
Uberen on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
That's not what the FF did though. They took the political philosophy of Locke with them and built a nation on it. GB went back to monarchism and tyranny
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
>monarchism and tyranny

Not really. We didn't revolt because of the monarchy. That's a fatass lie.

GB was already a constitutional monarchy with a parliament that did every bit of actual governing and a king who existed as a figurehead. It has been like that since the glorious revolution.

Our revolt had very little whatsoever to do with Britain's monarchy, Washington simply chose to not make America one. It had to do with the central bank of England.

The parliament and monarchy were hardly any more tyrannical than the American government ever was. Besides the fact that they did the bidding of the bank of England. Although they didnt even need to, because the bank of england existed as its own entity with independence. Remind you of anything? Before the bank of England did this in the first place, there was no issue at all with parliament. But the bank of England controlled all currency, turned the colony's pound into a worthless currency, and was responsible for levying a fuck load of taxes because of the war with France. They mismanaged the money supply and caused a financial crash in Britain that made its way over to America furthermore.

The fact that the bank of England did private central bank shit is what caused the American revolution. Every other reason is infinitesimal in comparison to this alone. But of course you're lied to about this because the federal reserve has trumped the bank of England in every single machination of fuckery humanly possible and nobody wants 2 and 2 to be put together.
Deadsilos on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+1 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Some good points made here, but one that is left unsaid is that the Founders were all members of the masonic order. Historically, the Masonic Way is the aristocratic way. In this way, the founders were really aristocratic Luciferians. However god-fearing (which "god"?) they proclaimed to be, their secret order of lineage is rooted firmly in Luciferian occult practices. For better for worse, the Devil always requires a price be paid. No deal with the devil ever ends well. Our country's blessings have been bought with a curse, and one that continues to plague us to this day.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Not all of the founders were masons, but there were a few, and a few bad apples are enough to poison the bunch.
Erase99 on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+1 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
I think all the US founders were either freemasons or deists. All hated organized Christianity (Catholic, Orthodox, etc).
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
There were a lot of both, but I dont think they were the actual majority. There were like 10 actual Masons at the most, though they were among the ringleaders.
RJ567 on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
https://xcancel.com/CCrowley100/status/1908261638764994700
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+1 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 4 children
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Technically only a minority were masons, a lot of them were just aristocrats who wanted their own flavor of Britain. However, as you said, even a few (((masons))) are enough to poison an organization and bring it to ruin.
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Deadsilos on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
🎯
DavidColeIntrepid on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
https://youtu.be/OwTTFJjjxiE?si=YD9t4rvCu8dE3-XV

Here's Aristocratic Utensil covering the founding of the US. While not exactly a full on monarchy the founders were violently opposed to democracy. That's why we have a Chief executive.

The masonic role in the establishment of the US is undeniable and something I have wrestled with for a while. The best conclusion I can come to is if the organization was ever at all based then it has long since been corrupted. Such as the Templars who fought back muslim hordes and retook the holy land then being invoked in the French revolution five centuries afterwards which was masonic jewish and communist (what's the difference, amirite).

Washington himself was adamant about the establishing of America as a new home for jews. I think he meant Jesus and the Aryan Essene as the real jews instead of the , edomite or whatever name you wish to use, asiatic fake jews who take the name today.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Unfortunately some of them were freemasons, which is why "freedom of religion" ( a dangerous heresy) and the line "all men are created equal" ended up in the founding documents and are part of the reason those documents are so toothless. Masonry is the fusion of Egalitarian and Gnosticism, which is why they so eagerly gave themselves over to Satanism (Ie the jews). Sadly the Tree of Liberty was infected with the "fruit of knowledge", the Bane of Man, from the very start.
DavidColeIntrepid on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
There were 2 revolutions. First with the articles of confederation then the one we hear about 12 years later. The tyranny the founders fought against was not king George. The monarchy was powerless for at least 100 years before that point. What the founders rebelled against was parliament. That's why we have a Chief executive. The founding fathers were VIOLENTLY opposed to democracy.
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Toast message