New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
>monarchism and tyranny

Not really. We didn't revolt because of the monarchy. That's a fatass lie.

GB was already a constitutional monarchy with a parliament that did every bit of actual governing and a king who existed as a figurehead. It has been like that since the glorious revolution.

Our revolt had very little whatsoever to do with Britain's monarchy, Washington simply chose to not make America one. It had to do with the central bank of England.

The parliament and monarchy were hardly any more tyrannical than the American government ever was. Besides the fact that they did the bidding of the bank of England. Although they didnt even need to, because the bank of england existed as its own entity with independence. Remind you of anything? Before the bank of England did this in the first place, there was no issue at all with parliament. But the bank of England controlled all currency, turned the colony's pound into a worthless currency, and was responsible for levying a fuck load of taxes because of the war with France. They mismanaged the money supply and caused a financial crash in Britain that made its way over to America furthermore.

The fact that the bank of England did private central bank shit is what caused the American revolution. Every other reason is infinitesimal in comparison to this alone. But of course you're lied to about this because the federal reserve has trumped the bank of England in every single machination of fuckery humanly possible and nobody wants 2 and 2 to be put together.
Toast message