Tolerance is the enemy of self preservation.
(media.scored.co)
Spot on
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
7 comments:
12
1 year ago
12 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+12Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Let's not deceive ourselves this time.
We cannot "win" and declare victory as long as there are people actively trying to destroy us. They must be uprooted and eliminated. We must be eternally and perpetually vigilant so they never can take root again.
We cannot "win" and declare victory as long as there are people actively trying to destroy us. They must be uprooted and eliminated. We must be eternally and perpetually vigilant so they never can take root again.
Can we ever *completely* eliminate subversion? If not, it's a bad idea to try; putting subversive elements in fear incentivises deception and you won't see them until it's too late. The reason everyone is noticing now is because They feel that They're in control and not us. If the situation were to reverse, they just go back into hiding.
Better to compartmentalize. Create a place, separate from us, that They can go to be around others who wish us harm. That way, when we need to deal with them, we know who and where They are.
Better to compartmentalize. Create a place, separate from us, that They can go to be around others who wish us harm. That way, when we need to deal with them, we know who and where They are.
> Can we ever completely eliminate subversion?
People often think in absolutes, and that's wrong. If you can reduce subversion by 90%, is it still worth doing it? Obviously yes. If that reduction "only" lasts for a century, is it still worth it? Yes.
> putting subversive elements in fear incentivises deception
Which severely reduces its ability to spread. It is inevitable that the rats will crawl back into their holes.
> and you won't see them until it's too late.
This approach is only feasible if you can blitzkrieg your way to eliminate all subversion. A high requirement, and also unrealistic. It's not like all White people will hide the secret until the code message is given, and then all turn immediately on all shitskins, kikes and mongrels. It takes many years to make people notice, and the degree of commitment varies. For one you can't expect women, children and elderly to do anything, so you can easily subtract ~70% of your population as forces, while 100% of **them** are enemies.
But you *can* ensure that the noticing is permanent. So if they have to hide in the holes forever, that's a good outcome. And sooner or later they'll be found anyway.
> separate from us
The inherent problem with that is that people who are not around niggers will never understand why people could oppose niggers. They see niggers in movies, news, sportsball and TV, and they are smart, fine and funny. They believe in equality and the virtues of tolerance.
Within a short time, the jewish subversion will seep in inevitably, and then the segregation plan is over for decades at least.
In order for people to deal with the jewish problem and nigger problem, they *have* to be around them and accrue noticing information. Unless you can completely cut off indoctrination and propaganda when segregated, then maybe it can work.
People often think in absolutes, and that's wrong. If you can reduce subversion by 90%, is it still worth doing it? Obviously yes. If that reduction "only" lasts for a century, is it still worth it? Yes.
> putting subversive elements in fear incentivises deception
Which severely reduces its ability to spread. It is inevitable that the rats will crawl back into their holes.
> and you won't see them until it's too late.
This approach is only feasible if you can blitzkrieg your way to eliminate all subversion. A high requirement, and also unrealistic. It's not like all White people will hide the secret until the code message is given, and then all turn immediately on all shitskins, kikes and mongrels. It takes many years to make people notice, and the degree of commitment varies. For one you can't expect women, children and elderly to do anything, so you can easily subtract ~70% of your population as forces, while 100% of **them** are enemies.
But you *can* ensure that the noticing is permanent. So if they have to hide in the holes forever, that's a good outcome. And sooner or later they'll be found anyway.
> separate from us
The inherent problem with that is that people who are not around niggers will never understand why people could oppose niggers. They see niggers in movies, news, sportsball and TV, and they are smart, fine and funny. They believe in equality and the virtues of tolerance.
Within a short time, the jewish subversion will seep in inevitably, and then the segregation plan is over for decades at least.
In order for people to deal with the jewish problem and nigger problem, they *have* to be around them and accrue noticing information. Unless you can completely cut off indoctrination and propaganda when segregated, then maybe it can work.
Toast message