Tolerance is the enemy of self preservation.
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
People often think in absolutes, and that's wrong. If you can reduce subversion by 90%, is it still worth doing it? Obviously yes. If that reduction "only" lasts for a century, is it still worth it? Yes.
> putting subversive elements in fear incentivises deception
Which severely reduces its ability to spread. It is inevitable that the rats will crawl back into their holes.
> and you won't see them until it's too late.
This approach is only feasible if you can blitzkrieg your way to eliminate all subversion. A high requirement, and also unrealistic. It's not like all White people will hide the secret until the code message is given, and then all turn immediately on all shitskins, kikes and mongrels. It takes many years to make people notice, and the degree of commitment varies. For one you can't expect women, children and elderly to do anything, so you can easily subtract ~70% of your population as forces, while 100% of **them** are enemies.
But you *can* ensure that the noticing is permanent. So if they have to hide in the holes forever, that's a good outcome. And sooner or later they'll be found anyway.
> separate from us
The inherent problem with that is that people who are not around niggers will never understand why people could oppose niggers. They see niggers in movies, news, sportsball and TV, and they are smart, fine and funny. They believe in equality and the virtues of tolerance.
Within a short time, the jewish subversion will seep in inevitably, and then the segregation plan is over for decades at least.
In order for people to deal with the jewish problem and nigger problem, they *have* to be around them and accrue noticing information. Unless you can completely cut off indoctrination and propaganda when segregated, then maybe it can work.