Looking at the dichotomy between "right" and "left", and seeing that the left is truly violent while the "right" is incredibly passive, some thoughts came to mind.
Why is the left violent? Because that is their philosophy, at its core. The world is unjust, and so "we" must do something about that. What can be done? Their answer is to tear down all institutions of power. They think that anyone who is stronger than them is a threat to them. And so they lash out wildly against anyone and everyone, endlessly. Whatever the problem is -- it's not the left, it's everyone else!
Why isn't the right violent? Because that is their philosophy at its core. The world is unjust, and "we" must do something about that. What can be done? Their answer is that by rightly living, they can ease and perhaps even end some of the suffering. They think that they have some power and that they must use that power wisely. Anyone stronger than them isn't necessarily a threat, but a potential partner or ally. And so they seek to reconcile and arbitrate disputes.
I don't see how these two philosophies will ever reconcile. The left is a cancer that the right has created by its passivity and reconciliatory nature. And leftists who take two moments to think seriously will always end up in the right.
The right wing represents the natural order. It goes even as far as mere logic and math. The reason they do not do anything is because they are not the ones who feel the need to change anything. They are the status quo, the "things as they are." But this principle does not belong to the right wing only - it's a natural stance most people have.
The left wing represents the opposition against that natural order. They want to change it, to defy reality and logic. They believe in irrational nonsense and impose irrational economic systems if in charge. Their opposition to the natural order also frees them from any tie to the country - it means they can play deathmatch PvP culturally, economically against all those gullible people who just live in the "things as they are" state of mind who just want to succeed within that system.
As such the left has the standard to seek power by all means necessary, without any moral restrictions. Not everything works, so it's limited to what they can do, but the Soviet Union and former communist China were examples of where it *did* work, and it turned out horribly.
Inevitably, because nothing that is based on fantasy works. The left essentially has the mantra of "if we all pretend our fantasy is real, it's real!" but that doesn't work.
jews ARE leftists by the nature of their being, and they are possibly the truest form of it. They never care about the host nation or its people, they worship Moloch, also known as Satan, they play ALL the trickeries to enrich themselves, they are beacons of corruption and have NO moral issues. If you have an actual older White lefty, you have someone who still has principles, and merely opposes shitty healthcare methods and big corporations getting bigger as people get poorer (relatively seen). But for the jew these things are just what he pretends to care about. He actually wants maximum subversion: Faggotry, niggadry, race mixing, goyim-maxxing, power, status and wealth. The common lefty, unbeknownst of the true nature of the jew, merely goes along.
Today we are here, with MASSIVE subversion. Indoctrination and propaganda in full force, all generations are by default brainwashed, and perpetrate the misery or are idle doing nothing against it. "Individualism" merely seeks to save *some* individuals from it, arguably, but there is no big movement yet to collectively get rid of all that subversion, to save *everybody*, which is in essence the same as the jewish problem. You solve one, you solve the other.