New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Looking at the dichotomy between "right" and "left", and seeing that the left is truly violent while the "right" is incredibly passive, some thoughts came to mind.

Why is the left violent? Because that is their philosophy, at its core. The world is unjust, and so "we" must do something about that. What can be done? Their answer is to tear down all institutions of power. They think that anyone who is stronger than them is a threat to them. And so they lash out wildly against anyone and everyone, endlessly. Whatever the problem is -- it's not the left, it's everyone else!

Why isn't the right violent? Because that is their philosophy at its core. The world is unjust, and "we" must do something about that. What can be done? Their answer is that by rightly living, they can ease and perhaps even end some of the suffering. They think that they have some power and that they must use that power wisely. Anyone stronger than them isn't necessarily a threat, but a potential partner or ally. And so they seek to reconcile and arbitrate disputes.

I don't see how these two philosophies will ever reconcile. The left is a cancer that the right has created by its passivity and reconciliatory nature. And leftists who take two moments to think seriously will always end up in the right.
You must log in or sign up to comment
14 comments:
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
The right is just as violent if not more. “They are pretorian guard of the left”

The jew on the right starts the blood bath wars and the jew on the left then cries out in pain and imports the rape-fugee.

Then both left and right jew circle jirkle each other hopping up and down in glee that they have killed more fucken goy behind closed foreskins parties.

MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Jews aren't directly violent. They rely on others to do their fighting.
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Hence niggers and goy
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
MartinRigggs on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Progressive leftists are consumed by evil ideation. Vices control the mind’s of leftists, sexual degeneracy, drug abuse, jealousy and envy, they’re weak people both physically and mentally, they are usually spoiled brats, they refuse to work hard for anything, self culpability is completely foreign to them, they HATE anyone who is successful because ultimately, successful people are a reminder to them of just how pathetic they are. They want to destroy the world because they can’t find real meaning in life, and the ironic thing is, between their selfish mindset that drives all of their vices, along with progressive ideals such as feminism, they’ve been robbed of finding real meaning in life.

The right is generally the opposite mindset, thus we are less prone to creating chaos for no logical reason, knowing that chaos holds the potential to rob us of what we love. I wouldn’t say we are less violent, the military has traditionally been chocked full of right wing White males who are very violent when we think it’s called for. Our violence is driven by righteous intentions like protecting what we love, be it our family or our nation.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
It's almost "good v. evil", but the right in America is not taking the necessary steps to actually be good. They think that not doing evil is enough. It's not. We must be intolerant of evil and be aggressive in expelling it from our society. And I don't mean deportation.

This neo-nazi or alt-right or whatever movement is running, it seems, on people who are realizing that simply self-improving and such is not enough. At some point we're going to have to use violence to secure peace. Too many of us are hoping that the left will initiate the violence to such a scale that we wouldn't feel internally conflicted for wiping them off the planet, but I think the left knows that and won't take things that far for that reason.
Delon on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
actually the left is a subversion tool of the kikes that is used to attack a society and the "right" is a subversion tool of the kikes that is used to pacify a society
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Sounds about right.
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
"Left" and "right" do not exist, it is not a coherent dichotomy.

The "right" would be considered extreme "left" during the pre enlightenment.

There is a period of time before humans make civilization, these are the "animalistic ages", or the "base state". Humans are stronger in the base state.

There is also period of time after civilization is built, but before it gets subverted by falsehoods. This period of time is when humans start to grow a bit weaker than before, since they become plebians, but the civilization they have could possibly go a very long time without collapsing if it does not get subverted, but alas, it is always subverted.

The aristicrats invent falsehoods. Modernism takes hold. Coherency dies. Civilization starts to rot and the plebeians become weaker and dumber than ever before. They temporarily return to the base state before things get rebuilt.

Aristocrats, Plebians, Animals, and Aryans. Those are the only political groups that exist for humans.

Gotta make the "leftright" delusion die before it kills us all.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Agreed.

I think you're more talking towards the progressive v. conservative divide, where the progressives are trying to push society "forward" while the conservatives want to put on the brakes. The right way to deal with progressives is not conservatism, it is to eliminate the progressives and roll their changes back.

Fundamentally, the idea that has spoiled the pot in America is that if we simply take care of ourselves and don't do evil that society as a whole will do just fine. That's simply not the case. We must be aggressive and active in propelling society in a positive direction, and when there are people pulling it in the opposite direction, we must not simply resist, but eliminate them as threats to the whole.

For instance, the right way to deal with marxism is not to debate them. It's to throw them out of helicopters. It's to drive them into the woods and then burn them down. You don't make peace with an enemy who doesn't acknowledge your most basic human rights. You thoroughly defeat them on the field of battle and piss on their graves.
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
the neocon right likes aggressive foreign intervention

right often is fine with self-defense violence, or state-appointed violence (like ICE "removals")

left likes emotionally driven violence

they're definitely incompatible viewpoints... well, the neoliberal left is thought to be "ok" to some of the right, but the socialist / communist element (which is often what we think of when we think of the "left") is probably more directly in conflict with rightwing values
IGOexiled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The right doesn't have to address this. The individuals on the left will move right on their own in order to find what resources they need to survive, or they will continue to stay on the left until they rot to dust. Neither is the concern of the right.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
When I look at history, I see all too often the following pattern emerge.

At first, society is relatively stable.

Then, a revolutionary movement starts. They progress along simply because the rest of society doesn't want to do anything about it. Eventually, the revolutionaries achieve enough momentum that they force the hand of the rest of society, and there is a civil war.

The outcome of the civil war is one of three cases: Either the revolutionaries win, the others win, or the revolutionaries retreat into the woods. The others might think that this third option is a victory, but it is not. It is simply delayed defeat.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It's a little deeper than that.

The right wing represents the natural order. It goes even as far as mere logic and math. The reason they do not do anything is because they are not the ones who feel the need to change anything. They are the status quo, the "things as they are." But this principle does not belong to the right wing only - it's a natural stance most people have.

The left wing represents the opposition against that natural order. They want to change it, to defy reality and logic. They believe in irrational nonsense and impose irrational economic systems if in charge. Their opposition to the natural order also frees them from any tie to the country - it means they can play deathmatch PvP culturally, economically against all those gullible people who just live in the "things as they are" state of mind who just want to succeed within that system.

As such the left has the standard to seek power by all means necessary, without any moral restrictions. Not everything works, so it's limited to what they can do, but the Soviet Union and former communist China were examples of where it *did* work, and it turned out horribly.

Inevitably, because nothing that is based on fantasy works. The left essentially has the mantra of "if we all pretend our fantasy is real, it's real!" but that doesn't work.

jews ARE leftists by the nature of their being, and they are possibly the truest form of it. They never care about the host nation or its people, they worship Moloch, also known as Satan, they play ALL the trickeries to enrich themselves, they are beacons of corruption and have NO moral issues. If you have an actual older White lefty, you have someone who still has principles, and merely opposes shitty healthcare methods and big corporations getting bigger as people get poorer (relatively seen). But for the jew these things are just what he pretends to care about. He actually wants maximum subversion: Faggotry, niggadry, race mixing, goyim-maxxing, power, status and wealth. The common lefty, unbeknownst of the true nature of the jew, merely goes along.

Today we are here, with MASSIVE subversion. Indoctrination and propaganda in full force, all generations are by default brainwashed, and perpetrate the misery or are idle doing nothing against it. "Individualism" merely seeks to save *some* individuals from it, arguably, but there is no big movement yet to collectively get rid of all that subversion, to save *everybody*, which is in essence the same as the jewish problem. You solve one, you solve the other.
Toast message