Protocols of of the Elders of Zion were debunked by a Jew
(files.catbox.moe)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
"This thing is telling me *exactly what I want to hear*, therefore it *must be true.*"
The comments here indicate that some of you have a very worryingly low IQ to not understand. Example, one of the comments:
>And please explain how the actual CONTENTS of the manuscript are not being enacted by jews in power and influence.
If ConPro were secretly tasked with writing a fake piece of jewish lore with the intent of undermining jewish interests, it would literally read exactly like the fucking Protocols. Furthermore, if the intended *audience* of that fake piece of lore *was also for ConPro itself*, it would probably echo shit people here have literally said.
But rather than looking at it and saying "hold on, this is too good to be true, and why doesn't even remotely sound like a jew wrote it?", everyone would run around going "OMG IT'S PROVEN" and the world would continue to take none of you seriously whatsoever.
The fact that the Protocols literally tell you *exactly what you want to hear*, every single last word on every single page, that it's magically revealing some 'secret' jewish plan that they just *happened* to have written out in *exacting* detail, compiled together in a mysterious book that appeared out of thin air like magic in the 20th century, without *any* sort of attribution or explanation where it came from...
Dude I refuse to believe that all of you are this fucking gullible. Holy shit AI's ability to fake anything is going to completely destroy your reality if you are actually so easily manipulated.
Then again, who am I kidding. There hasn't been one single conspiracy theory, no matter how fabulously fucking stupid, that this place hasn't literally fallen for every word of and reacted in psychotic rednecky retard anger if anyone even dares suggest it might be fake and gay.
---
Let's pretend that someone you deeply trust comes to you with ironclad proof that the Protocols were actually a total fabrication, in a way that is utterly insurmountable.
Would that change your opinions on the jews?
If not, then what is the point of wasting any part of your time with them? If your opinion wouldn't change with or without them, then why even consider the Protocols in the first place, when their origins *are* dubious?