You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
> "Muh ebil gommies" have been dead for ages
See, people struggle to understand that "communism" shouldn't be understood in a narrow way. Communism has the foundational idea of egalitarianism with the idea that every human (and nigger) is "equal."
EVERYTHING the left is doing is based on that idea. The economic side is of lower relevance - as long as the jews can do their usury and corruption, and extract wealth from the goyim to themselves, it's sufficient for them. It's essentially a sales pitch, which allows them to seize power.
Think about it: The idea of "tolerance", aka tolerating degeneracy and niggers has the foundation that "everybody is equal." Faggots who are turbo-hedonistic animals with very noticeable statistical differences "are just like you", and therefore should be "treated equally." This is why faggot marriage is a thing too.
And niggers, well, shouldn't they get the same "social security" as everybody else? They are ultimately equal! Except no, they aren't. They are an entirely distinct species of low-IQ savages, and everyone stupid enough to mongrelize with them is doomed to extinction.
And aren't illegal, drug dealing, raping, human trafficking, welfare leeching, low-IQ Mexiniggers who predominantly vote left just the same as you are? According to the jews, yes.
Calling it "communism" may be slightly off, but it's roughly correct. Neo-Marxism, wokeism, Western Liberalism, neo-communism, judaism - these may be more accurate, but all refer to the SAME core ideology - egalitarianism.
The issue with conflating egalitarianism and communism is the fact that the average communist country is less racially diverse than America, a capitalist country.
Shitskins that try to do their thing in chink land are quickly sentenced to death.
The most diverse communist country is cuba, but even then, they claim to be 64% White, thus making them Whiter than america.
They are probably lying Aztec mutts, but even so, the other communist countries are less diverse than america.
Sure, but we are talking about differing versions of the SAME ideology. Communism is rooted in the idea of egalitarianism, just as "liberalism" is. It's the same type of disease - or rather: However it manifests, it's ALL some variant of a disease.
So it's not off by too much. To call it communism is maybe 30% wrong at best.
Ethnic homogeneity is NOT intended in actual communism btw, it's just a side-effect of NOT hauling in infinite niggers with welfare gibs, which wasn't feasible when communism was at its peak. The Soviets did a lot of forced ethnic migrations (which btw killed a lot of people) to further their race-mixing agendas.
The nigger importation is a very modern phenomenon, and handing niggers special privileges is an American phenomenon that's relatively novel too.
It may even just boil down to a discrepancy of time and technology. If communism would emerge today, it would be... well, exactly what we have today. Mass-nigger imports, faggotry, rampant corruption, muh' Science™, 15 minute cities, kikes buying up agricultural land in mass, goyslop, consumerism, high taxes, etc.
"Capitalism" is not a thing. It's a term made up by the communist jew Karl Marx ("Das Kapital"). There is the market, and it can have varying amounts of freedom (taxation, regulations, manipulation). Fundamentally it means people work to create or do something, and they sell it to others, and if many do that, you have a large network of trading.
But if they'd really oppose rich getting richer, why did they put this fundamental market process into the same category as "capitalism"?
Leftists/communists like to claim they oppose "capitalism", but it's nothing more than a hollow slogan. It was all about ruining normal interactions and seizing power over everything they could.
During communist regimes corruption was extreme. Literal idiots and genocidal kikes were put into positions of power, and good people were killed or disarmed. It was common knowledge that you had to bribe police, doctors and bureaucrats to have something get done.
It's all kike regime, corruption. Kikes dancing around in the US making life worse for everyone, or kikes dancing around in the Soviet Union making life worse for everyone. The difference is that the US wasn't as tyrannical as the East, and maintained the economy.
> most communists view liberal as an insult.
Communists are literally retarded and delusional. They know nothing and simply abide by their ideology. They consider the most menial-benign things an "insult."
> I suppose all of the terms above are all a product of the same thing though. The enlightenment.
Maybe. But I'd argue the common denominator is the jew. Figuring that out worked wonders for NS Germany. Underestimating the jew was their downfall.
See, people struggle to understand that "communism" shouldn't be understood in a narrow way. Communism has the foundational idea of egalitarianism with the idea that every human (and nigger) is "equal."
EVERYTHING the left is doing is based on that idea. The economic side is of lower relevance - as long as the jews can do their usury and corruption, and extract wealth from the goyim to themselves, it's sufficient for them. It's essentially a sales pitch, which allows them to seize power.
Think about it: The idea of "tolerance", aka tolerating degeneracy and niggers has the foundation that "everybody is equal." Faggots who are turbo-hedonistic animals with very noticeable statistical differences "are just like you", and therefore should be "treated equally." This is why faggot marriage is a thing too.
And niggers, well, shouldn't they get the same "social security" as everybody else? They are ultimately equal! Except no, they aren't. They are an entirely distinct species of low-IQ savages, and everyone stupid enough to mongrelize with them is doomed to extinction.
And aren't illegal, drug dealing, raping, human trafficking, welfare leeching, low-IQ Mexiniggers who predominantly vote left just the same as you are? According to the jews, yes.
Calling it "communism" may be slightly off, but it's roughly correct. Neo-Marxism, wokeism, Western Liberalism, neo-communism, judaism - these may be more accurate, but all refer to the SAME core ideology - egalitarianism.
Shitskins that try to do their thing in chink land are quickly sentenced to death.
The most diverse communist country is cuba, but even then, they claim to be 64% White, thus making them Whiter than america.
They are probably lying Aztec mutts, but even so, the other communist countries are less diverse than america.
So it's not off by too much. To call it communism is maybe 30% wrong at best.
Ethnic homogeneity is NOT intended in actual communism btw, it's just a side-effect of NOT hauling in infinite niggers with welfare gibs, which wasn't feasible when communism was at its peak. The Soviets did a lot of forced ethnic migrations (which btw killed a lot of people) to further their race-mixing agendas.
The nigger importation is a very modern phenomenon, and handing niggers special privileges is an American phenomenon that's relatively novel too.
It may even just boil down to a discrepancy of time and technology. If communism would emerge today, it would be... well, exactly what we have today. Mass-nigger imports, faggotry, rampant corruption, muh' Science™, 15 minute cities, kikes buying up agricultural land in mass, goyslop, consumerism, high taxes, etc.
Goyslop and consumerism sound more like a capitalist thing, rather than a communist thing.
I suppose all of the terms above are all a product of the same thing though. The enlightenment.
But if they'd really oppose rich getting richer, why did they put this fundamental market process into the same category as "capitalism"?
Leftists/communists like to claim they oppose "capitalism", but it's nothing more than a hollow slogan. It was all about ruining normal interactions and seizing power over everything they could.
During communist regimes corruption was extreme. Literal idiots and genocidal kikes were put into positions of power, and good people were killed or disarmed. It was common knowledge that you had to bribe police, doctors and bureaucrats to have something get done.
It's all kike regime, corruption. Kikes dancing around in the US making life worse for everyone, or kikes dancing around in the Soviet Union making life worse for everyone. The difference is that the US wasn't as tyrannical as the East, and maintained the economy.
> most communists view liberal as an insult.
Communists are literally retarded and delusional. They know nothing and simply abide by their ideology. They consider the most menial-benign things an "insult."
> I suppose all of the terms above are all a product of the same thing though. The enlightenment.
Maybe. But I'd argue the common denominator is the jew. Figuring that out worked wonders for NS Germany. Underestimating the jew was their downfall.