You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Sure, but we are talking about differing versions of the SAME ideology. Communism is rooted in the idea of egalitarianism, just as "liberalism" is. It's the same type of disease - or rather: However it manifests, it's ALL some variant of a disease.
So it's not off by too much. To call it communism is maybe 30% wrong at best.
Ethnic homogeneity is NOT intended in actual communism btw, it's just a side-effect of NOT hauling in infinite niggers with welfare gibs, which wasn't feasible when communism was at its peak. The Soviets did a lot of forced ethnic migrations (which btw killed a lot of people) to further their race-mixing agendas.
The nigger importation is a very modern phenomenon, and handing niggers special privileges is an American phenomenon that's relatively novel too.
It may even just boil down to a discrepancy of time and technology. If communism would emerge today, it would be... well, exactly what we have today. Mass-nigger imports, faggotry, rampant corruption, muh' Science™, 15 minute cities, kikes buying up agricultural land in mass, goyslop, consumerism, high taxes, etc.
"Capitalism" is not a thing. It's a term made up by the communist jew Karl Marx ("Das Kapital"). There is the market, and it can have varying amounts of freedom (taxation, regulations, manipulation). Fundamentally it means people work to create or do something, and they sell it to others, and if many do that, you have a large network of trading.
But if they'd really oppose rich getting richer, why did they put this fundamental market process into the same category as "capitalism"?
Leftists/communists like to claim they oppose "capitalism", but it's nothing more than a hollow slogan. It was all about ruining normal interactions and seizing power over everything they could.
During communist regimes corruption was extreme. Literal idiots and genocidal kikes were put into positions of power, and good people were killed or disarmed. It was common knowledge that you had to bribe police, doctors and bureaucrats to have something get done.
It's all kike regime, corruption. Kikes dancing around in the US making life worse for everyone, or kikes dancing around in the Soviet Union making life worse for everyone. The difference is that the US wasn't as tyrannical as the East, and maintained the economy.
> most communists view liberal as an insult.
Communists are literally retarded and delusional. They know nothing and simply abide by their ideology. They consider the most menial-benign things an "insult."
> I suppose all of the terms above are all a product of the same thing though. The enlightenment.
Maybe. But I'd argue the common denominator is the jew. Figuring that out worked wonders for NS Germany. Underestimating the jew was their downfall.
So it's not off by too much. To call it communism is maybe 30% wrong at best.
Ethnic homogeneity is NOT intended in actual communism btw, it's just a side-effect of NOT hauling in infinite niggers with welfare gibs, which wasn't feasible when communism was at its peak. The Soviets did a lot of forced ethnic migrations (which btw killed a lot of people) to further their race-mixing agendas.
The nigger importation is a very modern phenomenon, and handing niggers special privileges is an American phenomenon that's relatively novel too.
It may even just boil down to a discrepancy of time and technology. If communism would emerge today, it would be... well, exactly what we have today. Mass-nigger imports, faggotry, rampant corruption, muh' Science™, 15 minute cities, kikes buying up agricultural land in mass, goyslop, consumerism, high taxes, etc.
Goyslop and consumerism sound more like a capitalist thing, rather than a communist thing.
I suppose all of the terms above are all a product of the same thing though. The enlightenment.
But if they'd really oppose rich getting richer, why did they put this fundamental market process into the same category as "capitalism"?
Leftists/communists like to claim they oppose "capitalism", but it's nothing more than a hollow slogan. It was all about ruining normal interactions and seizing power over everything they could.
During communist regimes corruption was extreme. Literal idiots and genocidal kikes were put into positions of power, and good people were killed or disarmed. It was common knowledge that you had to bribe police, doctors and bureaucrats to have something get done.
It's all kike regime, corruption. Kikes dancing around in the US making life worse for everyone, or kikes dancing around in the Soviet Union making life worse for everyone. The difference is that the US wasn't as tyrannical as the East, and maintained the economy.
> most communists view liberal as an insult.
Communists are literally retarded and delusional. They know nothing and simply abide by their ideology. They consider the most menial-benign things an "insult."
> I suppose all of the terms above are all a product of the same thing though. The enlightenment.
Maybe. But I'd argue the common denominator is the jew. Figuring that out worked wonders for NS Germany. Underestimating the jew was their downfall.