New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
87
flat earth- (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Shivananda on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +87Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
>Or the the disk is so vast that no one has been to the edge yet

I love this one because it would mean that the Sun must sit directly above us and just sort of circle around, in a bigger and small orbit depending on the season.

Also, we can't see *the sun* when it's over China cause...fog..? But Australia and Chili can see the same stars.

My primary interest in debating FE is how insanely I can force them to imaging the planet they live on.
removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> cause...fog..?

I think it's because something like the "range" of light. Which also raises the question - then why do we see the "firmament" (aka stars), even though the light emitted from them is much lower than that of the Sun or the moon (illuminated by the Sun), and they are more distant. If it was all about fog, then why is it so consistent, even though fog has such varying density? And how does fog cause total darkness during the night, but allows us to see stars?

To answer: It can't - both versions are retarded and logically incoherent. It's another haphazard attempt to bend and distort everything into place to make their flat Earth view work. Which doesn't - it's the sloppiest bullshit.

> My primary interest in debating FE is how insanely I can force them to imaging the planet they live on.

The level of idiocy they have by far exceeds anything we could corner them into. They've cornered themselves into the most insane things out of necessity, and to top it off, it's all based on extreme skepticism. Meaning they are immune to facts and logic, but *for some reason* extremely receptive to have their views reinforced by the SLIGHTEST of pushes.

Meaning you present them with 0.01x of evidence that supports their views, and they dig it unquestionably. Present them with 100x of evidence that opposes their views, and they reject it stubbornly.

It's a literal immunity to reason, and that's also how leftists in general operate with their egalitarianism beliefs.
Toast message