New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
46
Average lolbergtarian. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co (+1 / -0 / +45Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Progressives, cuckservatives, neocons etc. are all left wing.

If you believe in individual freedom then you are left wing by definition. You follow the ideology of the Enlightenment.

Right wing is National Socialism, fascism, Islamic theocracies, etc.

LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Hm, that is an interesting view of left vs right, it would probably cause most modernists to lose their heads, right and left modernists both.

Personally, I try to avoid words like "left" or "right" because they are way too vague, I prefer the four political groups that I made up.

Plebeian, aristocrat, aryan, animal.

Plebeians go to work and watch TV. They amount to nothing. They serve the aristocrats and are the majority of humans. They are stupid by definition. A good example would be Homer Simpson.

Aristocrats are they who rule civilization. They are a tiny group in comparison to peasants. Aristocrats are manipulative by nature, that is how they rise up the ranks. A good example would be literally every president or king in history. King Arthur would be a good guy example of an aristocrat. Benjamin Netanyahu would be an evil example.

An aryan is hard to describe. They are rare. They are essentially someone who is not a peasant or an aristocrat, at least not anymore, and they are also not a bum or a nuisance to the plebeians, those parasites are the next category. The vast majority of historical accomplishments are done by aristocrats or aryans, although the aristocrats obviously always have peasants helping them. Aryans are basically aristocrats without government power because they lack being manipulative, but they make up for that with personal strength. A good example of an Aryan would be the Average Robert E Howard protagonist, as well as people like Robin Hood and Aryan Tribesmen.

The final group is the animals. They are people who fall into no other category. Homeless people, career criminals, north sentinel island, bums, welfare queens, etc.

Many mistake animals for aryans because animals do what they want. But there is a massive difference.

If Robin hood robbed peasants instead of aristocrats, that would make him an animal, not an aryan.

An example of an animal would be Daniel Larson.


Alright, those are the four political positions that exist. What do you think?
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
What you listed (Plebeian, aristocrat, aryan, animal) are social classes. Not political positions.

Left wing and right wing have historically been used to describe the different positions around the concept of equality.
Left wing people believe that equality is something to strive for. Right wing people believe that equality is neither possible nor desirable. Right wing means you believe in *inequality* which inevitably leads you to see society not as a bunch of individuals who are "born free", but as a complex organism composed of different individuals with different roles and social statuses.

The concept of individual freedom comes of course from the ideology of equality. I believe a 18 year old girl should not be free to go with a nigger because she does not know what's good for her and for society. But a leftist thinks that, because she's *equal* to me, her own opinion counts the same as mine and therefore she should be free to do whatever she wants.

Your 4 social classes include social parasites, which should not be tolerated. Everyone needs to contribute to society to the best of his abilities; for someone that's just sweeping the floor, for another it's being a doctor, for another is being a man of genius and invent stuff.



LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The reason why the four political opinion I made up seem like social classes is because, in my opinion...

Politics only exists inside the mind. Opinions have little bearing on the world around us. To the point where political belief might as well not exist.

Plus, most political people do not practice what they preach, which makes it seem even faker.

Political opinions where made up by aristocrats to make plebeians somehow even dumber, by distracting them with false dichotomy.

That is why I like my 4 political positions that i detailed better than any other political chart.

It is simple and true. It leaves no room for false dichotomy such as right vs left.

Besides, it is funny to portray all political ideologies as "plebeian nonsense".
Toast message