1 year ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)1 child
Nazi Gun Control laws were literally less strict than modern american laws are. Communists are not people and therefore shouldnt have guns, but the Nazis basically let anyone else have them, heck, Hitler literally has an entire section of Mein Kamf dedicated to why the right to bear arms is necessary for a nation to defend itself, and it reads like one of the American founding fathers wrote it.
1 year ago6 points(+1/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
There is a lie that says american liberals are "far left", and american neocons and lolbergtarians are "far right".
In reality, the far left has been dead since 1991, and present day rightists are neutered, they would be considered progressive at least 100 years ago.
From an objective historical analysis, liberals, neocons, and lolbergs are all the same group, "modernist centrists".
From an even more objective perspective, all of these political terms are worthless and mean absolutely nothing because "politics" do not exist outside of the pathetic human brain.
Aristocrats, plebeians, Aryans, and animals.
Those are the only political positions that truly exist for all of time.
Liberals, neocons, and lolbergs are all plebeians. They believe the false dichotomy that the aristocracy feeds them, meanwhile animals invade civilization.
Hm, that is an interesting view of left vs right, it would probably cause most modernists to lose their heads, right and left modernists both.
Personally, I try to avoid words like "left" or "right" because they are way too vague, I prefer the four political groups that I made up.
Plebeian, aristocrat, aryan, animal.
Plebeians go to work and watch TV. They amount to nothing. They serve the aristocrats and are the majority of humans. They are stupid by definition. A good example would be Homer Simpson.
Aristocrats are they who rule civilization. They are a tiny group in comparison to peasants. Aristocrats are manipulative by nature, that is how they rise up the ranks. A good example would be literally every president or king in history. King Arthur would be a good guy example of an aristocrat. Benjamin Netanyahu would be an evil example.
An aryan is hard to describe. They are rare. They are essentially someone who is not a peasant or an aristocrat, at least not anymore, and they are also not a bum or a nuisance to the plebeians, those parasites are the next category. The vast majority of historical accomplishments are done by aristocrats or aryans, although the aristocrats obviously always have peasants helping them. Aryans are basically aristocrats without government power because they lack being manipulative, but they make up for that with personal strength. A good example of an Aryan would be the Average Robert E Howard protagonist, as well as people like Robin Hood and Aryan Tribesmen.
The final group is the animals. They are people who fall into no other category. Homeless people, career criminals, north sentinel island, bums, welfare queens, etc.
Many mistake animals for aryans because animals do what they want. But there is a massive difference.
If Robin hood robbed peasants instead of aristocrats, that would make him an animal, not an aryan.
An example of an animal would be Daniel Larson.
Alright, those are the four political positions that exist. What do you think?
What you listed (Plebeian, aristocrat, aryan, animal) are social classes. Not political positions.
Left wing and right wing have historically been used to describe the different positions around the concept of equality.
Left wing people believe that equality is something to strive for. Right wing people believe that equality is neither possible nor desirable. Right wing means you believe in *inequality* which inevitably leads you to see society not as a bunch of individuals who are "born free", but as a complex organism composed of different individuals with different roles and social statuses.
The concept of individual freedom comes of course from the ideology of equality. I believe a 18 year old girl should not be free to go with a nigger because she does not know what's good for her and for society. But a leftist thinks that, because she's *equal* to me, her own opinion counts the same as mine and therefore she should be free to do whatever she wants.
Your 4 social classes include social parasites, which should not be tolerated. Everyone needs to contribute to society to the best of his abilities; for someone that's just sweeping the floor, for another it's being a doctor, for another is being a man of genius and invent stuff.
The reason why the four political opinion I made up seem like social classes is because, in my opinion...
Politics only exists inside the mind. Opinions have little bearing on the world around us. To the point where political belief might as well not exist.
Plus, most political people do not practice what they preach, which makes it seem even faker.
Political opinions where made up by aristocrats to make plebeians somehow even dumber, by distracting them with false dichotomy.
That is why I like my 4 political positions that i detailed better than any other political chart.
It is simple and true. It leaves no room for false dichotomy such as right vs left.
Besides, it is funny to portray all political ideologies as "plebeian nonsense".
I hate always seeing opinions I agree with attached to anti-Nazi/Hitler bullshit. It's so disappointing.
Conservative + pro-Nazi + anti-Jew seems like the combination to save the world, but it seems like most people are pretty much 1/3: liberal and anti-Israel (but still probably believe the Holocaust happened) or conservative and pro-Israel.