New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
15
JoePutin on scored.co
1 year ago 15 points (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror )
So niggers commit the most crime everywhere you look, but since we cant generalize then its not true!
MartinRigggs on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
It’s bizarre to watch it try to rationalize why what you said is wrong while it admits that you are correct, it’s like talking to a leftist who can’t just slap a laugh react on your comment and then run away from the conversation once he/she realizes your viewpoint is factual while their’s is baseless beyond feelings. “All the data shows you’re correct but there are other factors way more powerful than race involved” is basically what it said. What makes those factors more powerful than genetics? And how is grok so certain that there aren’t genetic differences unique to the black demographic that play the main role in shaping behavior/culture/governance in very dysfunctional ways compared to other races?
gardinstong on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Fun fact about AI, it has no clue what's true or false, it can only summarize what it's been told.

Once they neuter it you'll end up with situations like this were it makes a well written argument against you, only to in next sentence provide facts which contradicts what it just said.
asdfik on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 3 children
why are you conversating with AI are you retarded or something?
konoplya on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
yes
antiretardant on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
It's not an AI, it's a chat bot
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I don’t have any friends and nobody will talk to me. 😞
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
jewish hands programmed this
Crockett on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Is there a replicatable strategy here to get people (and AI) to craft debunks that clown themselves? What happened here is that Grok tried to debunk you, and took the shortest route it could find to get there: attack a technicality about data collection that was available because of how you framed your question. Since it found its way to "debunk" you, it didn't feel the need to mask the basic facts that makes your points for you.

This suggests you could do this again on purpose. Just put some slack in your claim as bait to get the debunker to focus on that, and in doing so they'll fail to contest your basic point, and may even prove you right as part of their attempt to establish concept.

In fact, I think JD Vance is already doing this regularly. Like when he was talking to that journo bitch about the scourge of Venezuelan gangs taking over apartment complexes in Colorado. She responds "Um actually, only a handful of apartment complexes have been taken over." Then he smacks her down with "Can you hear yourself? 'Only a handful'? This shouldn't be happening at all."

It's a trap that they'll pretty much always fall for, because A) they believe so much in the power of the Almighty Debunk, an B) they don't have any actual good arguments to make, so they'll grasp on to the first one they think they've found. In any case, it's a good rhetorical trick to file away for use later.
konoplya on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
exactly right. then these people go on reddit asking questions on how to debate "nazis" regarding this and that. fucking brainlets.
Toast message