This is what they are “discussing”.
https://files.catbox.moe/e2ww2p.png
Some of the crazy comments.
https://files.catbox.moe/wededu.png
https://files.catbox.moe/bde9uq.png
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
5
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
> building concentration camps
They must be where students go when they are suffering from poor attention spans. Given the poor state of America's education system, it seems that we need concentration camps more now than ever.
Furthermore, didn't these idiots say the exact same thing between 2016-20 about illegals: illegals are being put in 'concentration camps'?
Were there any crematoriums or gas chambers in said concentration camps? Did a single illegal get turned into sausages, soap, or lampshades?
> dismantling the federal apparatus
Is that happening in any serious capacity? Furthermore, are libertarians and anarchists 'Nazis' too?
> annexing allied nations
Territorial expansion is essentially a thing of the past. Most wars are fought within states these days, e.g. Cameroon, DRC, Ethiopia, Sudan, and Yemen.
Just consider the last year or so: remember when people thought that Turkey was going to invade a Greek island, or when people thought that Venezuela was going to invade Guyana, and Brazil even moved soldiers to the Venezuelan border? Nothing happened in both instances.
Likewise, the probability of the US actually invading Canada or Greenland, or retaking the Panama Canal, is practically zero. Even if America was to control the Gaza Strip, it would inevitably be annexed by Israel, not America. For instance, the yids might have America take it over briefly just so that the Palestinians all become 'American', and now that they're American, they can all go 'back' to their home country, America, leaving a depopulated Gaza Strip for 'Greater Israel'. All these fantasies are at most just pipe dreams of Trump, ones shared by few others.
Actual Rightists would want to *shrink* the borders: dumping Hawaii and Puerto Rico would further rather than hinder our aims, for example, and the idiot Republicans would never even consider such a thing, as they are far removed from Rightism and are a people whose order of priorities is all wrong.
> Elon ... [Nazi]
People who see that video and read it as a Nazi salute are simply reading what they want to read into it there. If it was meant to be a Nazi salute, he clearly did it wrong.
Leftists and liberals need to Other people as 'oppressors' because believing that other people are responsible for the failings of oneself is psychologically more comforting than believing that oneself is responsible for them. If someone above me, more powerful than me, such as a patriarchy or bourgeoisie, are responsible for them, then I don't bear any burden. My burden is offloaded onto someone else, which makes me guilt-free.
That is all that all 'X is Hitler' narratives really amount to. If there are no superiors power-wise: no bourgeoisie, no Nazi elites, then who can I realistically blame for my own failings? Hence why the world is full of Hitlers and Nazis that are far removed from being actual Hitlers or Nazis.
However, the problems of the world are created by those very lower people doing this kind of name-calling, the self-styled oppressed, *not* those higher ones who lower ones identify as 'oppressive'.
Imagine if pre-colonial Africa wasn't 'cisheteronormative' and 'patriarchal'? Where Chief Ngubu decides one day that he is a trans-racial trans woman named Nguba, and is more worried about punishing his tribesmen who insult faggots than securing his tribe's food sources. Today's Africa would easily be twice as bad. Africa's population would never have reached anywhere near the numbers it has managed to reach.
The world is bad *in spite* of those 'oppressive' things, not because of them. No regenerative being uses 'Hitler' or 'Nazi' as an insult. If the self-styled oppressed would disappear from the face of the Earth, that would be almost synonymous with the disappearance of every degenerate, and the whole world would be a better, cleaner, and safer place for it.
They must be where students go when they are suffering from poor attention spans. Given the poor state of America's education system, it seems that we need concentration camps more now than ever.
Furthermore, didn't these idiots say the exact same thing between 2016-20 about illegals: illegals are being put in 'concentration camps'?
Were there any crematoriums or gas chambers in said concentration camps? Did a single illegal get turned into sausages, soap, or lampshades?
> dismantling the federal apparatus
Is that happening in any serious capacity? Furthermore, are libertarians and anarchists 'Nazis' too?
> annexing allied nations
Territorial expansion is essentially a thing of the past. Most wars are fought within states these days, e.g. Cameroon, DRC, Ethiopia, Sudan, and Yemen.
Just consider the last year or so: remember when people thought that Turkey was going to invade a Greek island, or when people thought that Venezuela was going to invade Guyana, and Brazil even moved soldiers to the Venezuelan border? Nothing happened in both instances.
Likewise, the probability of the US actually invading Canada or Greenland, or retaking the Panama Canal, is practically zero. Even if America was to control the Gaza Strip, it would inevitably be annexed by Israel, not America. For instance, the yids might have America take it over briefly just so that the Palestinians all become 'American', and now that they're American, they can all go 'back' to their home country, America, leaving a depopulated Gaza Strip for 'Greater Israel'. All these fantasies are at most just pipe dreams of Trump, ones shared by few others.
Actual Rightists would want to *shrink* the borders: dumping Hawaii and Puerto Rico would further rather than hinder our aims, for example, and the idiot Republicans would never even consider such a thing, as they are far removed from Rightism and are a people whose order of priorities is all wrong.
> Elon ... [Nazi]
People who see that video and read it as a Nazi salute are simply reading what they want to read into it there. If it was meant to be a Nazi salute, he clearly did it wrong.
Leftists and liberals need to Other people as 'oppressors' because believing that other people are responsible for the failings of oneself is psychologically more comforting than believing that oneself is responsible for them. If someone above me, more powerful than me, such as a patriarchy or bourgeoisie, are responsible for them, then I don't bear any burden. My burden is offloaded onto someone else, which makes me guilt-free.
That is all that all 'X is Hitler' narratives really amount to. If there are no superiors power-wise: no bourgeoisie, no Nazi elites, then who can I realistically blame for my own failings? Hence why the world is full of Hitlers and Nazis that are far removed from being actual Hitlers or Nazis.
However, the problems of the world are created by those very lower people doing this kind of name-calling, the self-styled oppressed, *not* those higher ones who lower ones identify as 'oppressive'.
Imagine if pre-colonial Africa wasn't 'cisheteronormative' and 'patriarchal'? Where Chief Ngubu decides one day that he is a trans-racial trans woman named Nguba, and is more worried about punishing his tribesmen who insult faggots than securing his tribe's food sources. Today's Africa would easily be twice as bad. Africa's population would never have reached anywhere near the numbers it has managed to reach.
The world is bad *in spite* of those 'oppressive' things, not because of them. No regenerative being uses 'Hitler' or 'Nazi' as an insult. If the self-styled oppressed would disappear from the face of the Earth, that would be almost synonymous with the disappearance of every degenerate, and the whole world would be a better, cleaner, and safer place for it.