So I got downvoted into oblivion on a post about socialism because I think that socialism is doomed to fail no matter what form, even national socialism.
Explain why national socialism is a better economic system than libertarian capitalism, assuming a white, Christian* ethnostate.
*Preferably Catholic and Orthodox, not butt-fucking Protestants
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)
Well then, I believe we misinterpreted each other from the beginning. I thought that you were advocating for libertarianism in the first place.
I think a decentralized government could be fine. Depending on whether or not the people have a developed tribal identity. If they do, a centralized government isn't necessary. If they don't, it's almost a given that a vanguard needs to instill this in them and reflect any jewish pestering until subsequent generations are fully indoctrinated. Were in an age where vanguard parties are necessary in the west until they aren't anymore. After that point, we could return to "medieval style" governance.
(The phrase vanguard party is a bolshevik invention. But it's a useful term with a good amount of merit in spite of it. A right wing governance under a radical party fills the role of a vanguard party)
I think a decentralized government could be fine. Depending on whether or not the people have a developed tribal identity. If they do, a centralized government isn't necessary. If they don't, it's almost a given that a vanguard needs to instill this in them and reflect any jewish pestering until subsequent generations are fully indoctrinated. Were in an age where vanguard parties are necessary in the west until they aren't anymore. After that point, we could return to "medieval style" governance.
(The phrase vanguard party is a bolshevik invention. But it's a useful term with a good amount of merit in spite of it. A right wing governance under a radical party fills the role of a vanguard party)