So I got downvoted into oblivion on a post about socialism because I think that socialism is doomed to fail no matter what form, even national socialism.
Explain why national socialism is a better economic system than libertarian capitalism, assuming a white, Christian* ethnostate.
*Preferably Catholic and Orthodox, not butt-fucking Protestants
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
6
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)2 children
The fact that what you describe has literally never existed in history is telling. Hierarchy is non negotiable. Even libertarianism ends up being hierarchical, it's just corporations instead of clergy or government.
In a White-only, libertarian society, there wouldn’t be legal entities known as (((corporations))). I think that would mitigate a LOT of the moral hazard of a free market. The most important thing for this society to work is to have a morally virtuous people that believe in God Almighty.
The premise of rampant individualism being spread inside of *whites only Christian societies* is exactly what started us down this rabbithole of ever increasing fuckery.
What race was John D Rockefeller? He definitely wasn't jewish. It's wrong to believe corporations magically will not appear in a world with no restrictions on "individual liberty and the free market" based off of the virtue of white people alone, which is very often tested. If every single one of us were morally scrupulous, there would be 0 jews in the west today. But not all of us are good. And the old adage says that shit rises to the top, and it's true.
Pointing to 1 jewphile oligarch is the exception that proves the rule.
White Christians do just fine with self-determination and free markets. It’s only when usurped by outside interests that it’s a problem. And that’s a problem even Benjamin Franklin warned extensively against.
I don't think it even makes sense, hypothetically.
The whole reason humans are so successful is because we are able to pool resources and act collectively to acheive a greater good. By ourselves, we're pretty unimpressive; we're not particularily strong or fast, no built in weapons or defenses, just unusually high stamina and that has to be spent constantly toiling to scrounge food, regulate temperature, and building shelter.
So what's the idea of Libertarianism? That everybody acts just for themselves? Aside from being extremely inefficient, it means everyone has to be able to do everything, which means it's constrained to stone age technology, realistically. Oh, and everyone also has to go and do everything they do while alert for other people robbing or raping them.
Much like the idea of a welfare state, the idea Libertarianism can only really exist in a society that has largely solved problems like crime and scarcity so that these solutions can be taken for granted.
What race was John D Rockefeller? He definitely wasn't jewish. It's wrong to believe corporations magically will not appear in a world with no restrictions on "individual liberty and the free market" based off of the virtue of white people alone, which is very often tested. If every single one of us were morally scrupulous, there would be 0 jews in the west today. But not all of us are good. And the old adage says that shit rises to the top, and it's true.
>funded by jews
>not jewish by genetics
>bad, morally unscrupulous white person that took jewish money
He also didn't need jews to be filthy rich because he struck oil in the 1800s. Jews just wanted to stake their claim in his revenue.
White Christians do just fine with self-determination and free markets. It’s only when usurped by outside interests that it’s a problem. And that’s a problem even Benjamin Franklin warned extensively against.
The whole reason humans are so successful is because we are able to pool resources and act collectively to acheive a greater good. By ourselves, we're pretty unimpressive; we're not particularily strong or fast, no built in weapons or defenses, just unusually high stamina and that has to be spent constantly toiling to scrounge food, regulate temperature, and building shelter.
So what's the idea of Libertarianism? That everybody acts just for themselves? Aside from being extremely inefficient, it means everyone has to be able to do everything, which means it's constrained to stone age technology, realistically. Oh, and everyone also has to go and do everything they do while alert for other people robbing or raping them.
Much like the idea of a welfare state, the idea Libertarianism can only really exist in a society that has largely solved problems like crime and scarcity so that these solutions can be taken for granted.