Turns out that having junkies shoot up in your bathroom is bad for business.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
6 comments:
3
1 year ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
They fired several employees including the manager for enforcing this policy in 2018. The White female successfully sued Starbucks for racial discrimination against Whites and after getting a $25million damages with $600k punitive judgment also secured $2.7m in lost wages and benefits.
And that’s why Trump removed the provisions forbidding hiring and firing on racial grounds. Jews cannot stand even a single white person taking from them in any way, and so it’s now legal to refuse to hire whites–explicitly because they are white–at any business.
I can’t wait to hire only Whites in my company as an open policy. I’m very excited about expanding into America and incorporating there. Take a guess at the only group I plan to hire, simply being White won’t be enough.
Also brain storming some sort of plan to help young Whites. Current best idea is offering apprenticeships right out of school no experience required, and if you serve 7 years with the company we’ll supply the building lot, all the labour free of charge to build a house of your choice, you just pay for material at the rate the company gets it. That way you start at 18, have a house by 25 at roughly 50% the cost (because labour was free) and a good career. The only stipulation is that you have to live in it a minimum of 7 years and if you sell have to offer it back to the corporation at the price you put in to it first so we can buy it and offer to other employees. This stops speculation and treating houses as commodities to constantly be flipped increasing costs and taxes while pricing others out. Homes are for raising White families, not getting rich at the expense of fellow Whites.
This is all currently in the works, details and legality has to be worked out along with budgeting but that’s the direction we would like to go.
Also brain storming some sort of plan to help young Whites. Current best idea is offering apprenticeships right out of school no experience required, and if you serve 7 years with the company we’ll supply the building lot, all the labour free of charge to build a house of your choice, you just pay for material at the rate the company gets it. That way you start at 18, have a house by 25 at roughly 50% the cost (because labour was free) and a good career. The only stipulation is that you have to live in it a minimum of 7 years and if you sell have to offer it back to the corporation at the price you put in to it first so we can buy it and offer to other employees. This stops speculation and treating houses as commodities to constantly be flipped increasing costs and taxes while pricing others out. Homes are for raising White families, not getting rich at the expense of fellow Whites.
This is all currently in the works, details and legality has to be worked out along with budgeting but that’s the direction we would like to go.
> This comes as a reversal of a 2018 open-door bathroom policy that was implemented by the company after two Black men, who had not ordered anything, were arrested at a Philadelphia location while waiting for a business meeting.
So they were there for a drug deal.
So they were there for a drug deal.
Even better, they claimed they were waiting to meet someone for a meeting about purchasing real estate, but the reality is they had brought hamburgers from another restaraunt and were playing music on a bluetooth speaker loudly which was bothering actual customers. WHen the employee followed the corporate rules and denied them the access code for the bathroom they became violent and were threatening to assault the White woman who was much smaller than either of them. The manager, a regional manager for NYC and northern NJ called the cops to have them formally trespassed from all Starbucks which she managed. And, of course, dat b raycizz. She was fired and it took 6 years for her lawsuit - which was obviously racial discrimination against Whites - to be decided. Starbucks refused to settle even though they had the evidence that these were not customers, they had brought food from another restaraunt, they were bothering paying customers, and they criminally threatened the employees, that refusing access to those who were not customers was corporate policy at the time, and that Starbucks went along with the racial narrative the entire time even until this latest decision to cease the policy they enacted.
Toast message