You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
green_man on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> This comes as a reversal of a 2018 open-door bathroom policy that was implemented by the company after two Black men, who had not ordered anything, were arrested at a Philadelphia location while waiting for a business meeting.
Even better, they claimed they were waiting to meet someone for a meeting about purchasing real estate, but the reality is they had brought hamburgers from another restaraunt and were playing music on a bluetooth speaker loudly which was bothering actual customers. WHen the employee followed the corporate rules and denied them the access code for the bathroom they became violent and were threatening to assault the White woman who was much smaller than either of them. The manager, a regional manager for NYC and northern NJ called the cops to have them formally trespassed from all Starbucks which she managed. And, of course, dat b raycizz. She was fired and it took 6 years for her lawsuit - which was obviously racial discrimination against Whites - to be decided. Starbucks refused to settle even though they had the evidence that these were not customers, they had brought food from another restaraunt, they were bothering paying customers, and they criminally threatened the employees, that refusing access to those who were not customers was corporate policy at the time, and that Starbucks went along with the racial narrative the entire time even until this latest decision to cease the policy they enacted.
So they were there for a drug deal.