I honestly don't have time to read it, but if you're asking me if I want Anglicans and Catholics to be in full communion with each other, then of course! But that would require Anglicans to shed any heretical beliefs (female clergy, sodomy being okay, etc.) and submit full obedience to the Pope, instead of the British King (because technically King Charles is the head of the Anglican Church, even if only nominally. The Archbishop of Canterbury serves him, but he needs to serve the Pope).
I just don’t like the idea of papal infallibility and having to believe that Mary was sinless. That’s why I’m not going to Rome. Certain dogmas are wild to me.
Because they’re salvific. Logically, it doesn’t make sense for Mary to be sinless. The Pope is also a man and can therefore err. Why should I have to believe Mary was bodily assumed to get into heaven? I have no problem with people believing these things, but the moment you make it necessary for salvation is where I have a problem.
Papal infallibility really shouldn’t be that hard for a Protestant to buy into, once you think about it a bit.
Let’s look at the New Testament: Sts. Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, James, and Jude were all just men, that sinned and made errors, like everyone else. However, even Protestants believe that when it came to writing the New Testament Gospels and Epistles, the Holy Spirit came down upon these normal men and made sure they committed no error in Faith or morality when writing the New Testament documents. No Protestant would have trouble believing that these imperfect men were infallible and inerrant when it came to the New Testament writings.
So then why doubt Papal Infallibility? Papal infallibility doesn’t mean the Pope is infallible in everything he says and does. No. That would be silly. Look at Pope Francis, for instance. He is wrong about a lot of things, and unfortunately causes a lot of scandal. But if he were to invoke Papal infallibility to teach ex cathedra, which means defining Dogma in laymen terms, of course the Holy Spirit would protect us faithful from allowing this admittedly flawed man to bind all Christians with something problematic. Fortunately, Papal Infallibility has only been invoked twice, once in 1950, when Pope Pius XII invoked it to declare the Assumption of Mart Dogma, and before that in 1854, when Pope Bl. Pius IX invoked it to declare the Immaculate Conception Dogma.
Which now brings us to that…
Even though it was declared Dogma in 1854, like many things declared Dogma, it was already believed by many Christians well before then…
If you do the research, you will find that even the early Church Fathers in the Second Century were professing belief in that Mary was the new Eve, and she was preserved from sin. And this belief was held by many Christians for centuries. The feast of the Immaculate Conception is understood to have started in the Eastern Church sometime between the 5th and 7th Centuries. So the whole belief in the Immaculate Conception was held by many things Christians wayyy before the schism happened between Rome and King Henry VIII.
Now, I will be fair here, and say that it wasn’t universal, but it was always a common pious opinion of Christians, even from the beginning of the Church.
But you’re concerned that you’d be bound to this as a Catholic. To be honest, when I converted from Protestantism to Catholicism I was worried about the Marian Dogmas at first too. But once I realized why these are critical to a good holistic Christ-centered theology, I learned to love them.
I would encourage you to just read Pope Pius IX’s encyclical Ineffabilis Deus, which is filled with references to Scripture and Church Fathers and Doctors, and shows that the whole reasoning behind this Dogma is most very much Christ-centric:
https://www.soulsandliberty.com/post/rome-moves-toward-full-communion-with-orthodox-anglicans
Papal infallibility really shouldn’t be that hard for a Protestant to buy into, once you think about it a bit.
Let’s look at the New Testament: Sts. Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, James, and Jude were all just men, that sinned and made errors, like everyone else. However, even Protestants believe that when it came to writing the New Testament Gospels and Epistles, the Holy Spirit came down upon these normal men and made sure they committed no error in Faith or morality when writing the New Testament documents. No Protestant would have trouble believing that these imperfect men were infallible and inerrant when it came to the New Testament writings.
So then why doubt Papal Infallibility? Papal infallibility doesn’t mean the Pope is infallible in everything he says and does. No. That would be silly. Look at Pope Francis, for instance. He is wrong about a lot of things, and unfortunately causes a lot of scandal. But if he were to invoke Papal infallibility to teach ex cathedra, which means defining Dogma in laymen terms, of course the Holy Spirit would protect us faithful from allowing this admittedly flawed man to bind all Christians with something problematic. Fortunately, Papal Infallibility has only been invoked twice, once in 1950, when Pope Pius XII invoked it to declare the Assumption of Mart Dogma, and before that in 1854, when Pope Bl. Pius IX invoked it to declare the Immaculate Conception Dogma.
Which now brings us to that…
Even though it was declared Dogma in 1854, like many things declared Dogma, it was already believed by many Christians well before then…
If you do the research, you will find that even the early Church Fathers in the Second Century were professing belief in that Mary was the new Eve, and she was preserved from sin. And this belief was held by many Christians for centuries. The feast of the Immaculate Conception is understood to have started in the Eastern Church sometime between the 5th and 7th Centuries. So the whole belief in the Immaculate Conception was held by many things Christians wayyy before the schism happened between Rome and King Henry VIII.
Now, I will be fair here, and say that it wasn’t universal, but it was always a common pious opinion of Christians, even from the beginning of the Church.
But you’re concerned that you’d be bound to this as a Catholic. To be honest, when I converted from Protestantism to Catholicism I was worried about the Marian Dogmas at first too. But once I realized why these are critical to a good holistic Christ-centered theology, I learned to love them.
I would encourage you to just read Pope Pius IX’s encyclical Ineffabilis Deus, which is filled with references to Scripture and Church Fathers and Doctors, and shows that the whole reasoning behind this Dogma is most very much Christ-centric:
https://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius09/p9ineff.htm
And just to toot my own horn a bit, I also wrote an article that references Scripture to show how the MarIan Dogmas are all consistent with Scripture:
https://christtheking.info/the-bible-supports-catholic-teaching-on-the-virgin-mary/#Doubting_The_Immaculate_Conception