After the last [rice-post](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19A1GoIRSn/never-chase-rice-/c) i've realized something very, very problematic in society
marriage nowadays isn't a sacred a union between a man and a woman, its a transaction
less and less marriages are based on trust and mutual love and mostly based on a woman's lust for the man's riches and the man's lust over a woman's well... you know
what is lacking in society is marriage that is based on trust, and the underlying issue of it all isn't just feminism or soy males, its people not marrying young
what do i mean by young? most people hold off marriage to either become financially stable or to "find the one" the latter end up with leftover rubbish and these relationships don't last
and i frankly think the ideal marriage is marriage that is based on struggle, what do i mean by struggle? [lets say two teenagers in love had a night of passion and got pregnant, and their parents are actual supportive Christians and not murderous jewish boomers](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/1htbqoa.mp4)
that is a marriage that is slated to last, because both the man and the woman are at the same age, same position and have mutual power-dynamic (one is not richer than the other, or more beautiful than the other) and both of them are determined and motivated to work hard and from a young age, not to mention young dudes with kids get preferential hiring priority (at least back in 2010's)
granted this kind of marriage was demonized to hell and back in the early 2000's, mostly because it happened due to lust and not genuine relationships, however i do genuinely see this as something plausible, the Germans literally had bride school for girls and boys went straight to military training, both of which married around the ages of 18-20 to encourage the birthrate
and i do genuinely think the early 20's are the ideal age to be a father/mother because after 30 your body starts to decay and deteriorate
but the big problem is really the economy, in this jewish economy its nigh impossible to raise a family proper, unless you forgo all non-essentials (TV, goyslop, vidya, social media, internet etc...)
but in an ideal world a family should have all the base comforts without having to sell their soul to jewish corporations, which is another factor why the birthrate is so damn low
because spics get free gibs and free housing, meanwhile joe and jane goyworker have to work 9 to 6 just to afford the bills (which includes mortgage) while their kids are subjected to the worst kind of abuse at the hands of marxists edjewcators
in an ideal situation, the parents can work and THEIR parents can HOMESCHOOL their kids 5-6 hours a day instead of burning their free time on watching TV or wageslaving in their late 60's, or the mother can work from home and still take care of the kids (good luck finding a modern woman who's willing to actually raise her kids instead of letting someone else do it but i digress)
in an event that jews are btfo'd from a certain state/country how would you encourage the birthrate in a more practical sense than what i've suggested?
marriage nowadays isn't a sacred a union between a man and a woman, its a transaction
less and less marriages are based on trust and mutual love and mostly based on a woman's lust for the man's riches and the man's lust over a woman's well... you know
what is lacking in society is marriage that is based on trust, and the underlying issue of it all isn't just feminism or soy males, its people not marrying young
what do i mean by young? most people hold off marriage to either become financially stable or to "find the one" the latter end up with leftover rubbish and these relationships don't last
and i frankly think the ideal marriage is marriage that is based on struggle, what do i mean by struggle? [lets say two teenagers in love had a night of passion and got pregnant, and their parents are actual supportive Christians and not murderous jewish boomers](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/1htbqoa.mp4)
that is a marriage that is slated to last, because both the man and the woman are at the same age, same position and have mutual power-dynamic (one is not richer than the other, or more beautiful than the other) and both of them are determined and motivated to work hard and from a young age, not to mention young dudes with kids get preferential hiring priority (at least back in 2010's)
granted this kind of marriage was demonized to hell and back in the early 2000's, mostly because it happened due to lust and not genuine relationships, however i do genuinely see this as something plausible, the Germans literally had bride school for girls and boys went straight to military training, both of which married around the ages of 18-20 to encourage the birthrate
and i do genuinely think the early 20's are the ideal age to be a father/mother because after 30 your body starts to decay and deteriorate
but the big problem is really the economy, in this jewish economy its nigh impossible to raise a family proper, unless you forgo all non-essentials (TV, goyslop, vidya, social media, internet etc...)
but in an ideal world a family should have all the base comforts without having to sell their soul to jewish corporations, which is another factor why the birthrate is so damn low
because spics get free gibs and free housing, meanwhile joe and jane goyworker have to work 9 to 6 just to afford the bills (which includes mortgage) while their kids are subjected to the worst kind of abuse at the hands of marxists edjewcators
in an ideal situation, the parents can work and THEIR parents can HOMESCHOOL their kids 5-6 hours a day instead of burning their free time on watching TV or wageslaving in their late 60's, or the mother can work from home and still take care of the kids (good luck finding a modern woman who's willing to actually raise her kids instead of letting someone else do it but i digress)
in an event that jews are btfo'd from a certain state/country how would you encourage the birthrate in a more practical sense than what i've suggested?
but it is logical... because what is love? attraction? satisfaction? spiritual harmony? back then emotions did not matter and people married for the the honor of their houses, but is it ideal? maybe... maybe not but nothing is perfect in this life and frankly the medieval system kept the population stable which is a genuine approach to marriage
alas women would view arranged marriage as something that only non-whites do which it kinda is...
Even in more modern times then medieval, a parent would want to arrange a marriage of their daughter to someone of a wealthier family as this would insure that the offspring is in need of nothing. But as for medieval times peasants didn't marry only for love - people were few and far apart, they married who they could to avoid inbreeding.
Love is a chemical reaction, yes, and it's powerful. The odds that someone seeing a woman they've had kids with sleeping with another man would murder one or the other are extremely high, which is bad for social cohesion if nothing else.
A big part of permanent marriage is stopping these feuds from breaking out. Upper class marriage is frought with divorce and infidelity because it exists against a backdrop of existing feuds and doesn't necessarily prevent conflict.
We should not confuse the two.