New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
50
posted 1 year ago by devotech2 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +50Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Syria would have never won a military invasion of Israel. At that level it's up to the big fish (namely iran), not syria.

In any case, Syria had another (related) problem going on for 13 years.
Mellop on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
He should've kept the chemical weapons, and better yet, added some nukes long ago.
Nothing like gas and a Plutonium-powered oven to strike fear into the goblins.
Maybe Iran will learn from Assad's mistakes...
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
>kept the chemical weapons

He never even really had that much to begin with to be honest

>added some nukes long ago.

Would have had america at the doorstep in defense of pissrael within mere seconds after starting development

>Maybe Iran will learn from Assad's mistakes

Iran's influence on syrian alawites is possibly the biggest reason why syria and Iraq never became a unified country so it is kind of directly their fault that this ever happened. The alternative scenario of iraq + syria (and at one point egypt was also included) would have created a massive power player in the region. It didn't even have to be one country. A UK scenario would have worked well. Israel might not exist anymore in this scenario. Iraq already was a major power on their own. I hope Iran can redeem themselves if anything.
Toast message