The Renaissance started in the 1300s.
The reformation started in the 1500s.
The reformation did not cause the renaissance.
Protestants ruined Christianity.
Protestants are literally retarded and gay.
Most of today's problems can be traced back to the reformation.
God had to call Joseph Smith to stop the damage that the protestants were causing.
You can't refute this because you know it is true.
SOLA SCRIPTURE, SOLA FIDE, and all the other SOLA's are complete and utter lies. Ask any Catholic, they've been trying to tell you protestants this for centuries now. Maybe you should pay a little attention to what they have to say hummm?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannine_Comma
Though I’ve never been a big trinitarian
You’re thinking of the lies about Acts 8:36-38, where jews claim that 37 “isn’t in the original” despite it literally being the entire fucking gospel.
> “And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.” **~ King James Version**; Acts 8:36-38
> “As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, ‘Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?’ And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him.” **~ New International Version**; Acts 8:36 & 38
> “And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, ‘See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?’ And he commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water, Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him.” **~ American Standard Version**; Acts 8:36 & 38
> “As they rode along, they came to some water, and the eunuch said, ‘Look! There’s some water! Why can’t I be baptized?’ He ordered the carriage to stop, and they went down into the water, and Philip baptized him.” **~ New Living Translation**; Acts 8:36 & 38
But as for the line I quoted above, ✡modern translations✡ do alter it, too, so that no “Bible” now agrees with any other.
> “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” **~ King James Version**; 1 John 5:7
> “For there are three that testify:” **~ New International Version**; 1 John 5:7
> “And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth.” **~ American Standard Version**; 1 John 5:7
> “So we have these three witnesses” **~ New Living Translation**; 1 John 5:7
>The text (with the Comma in brackets and italicised) in the King James Bible reads:
>7For there are three that beare record [in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.] 8[And there are three that beare witnesse in earth], the Spirit, and the Water, and the Blood, and these three agree in one.
— King James Version (1611)
The claim I’ve seen is that the entire “comma” (part in brackets) was added to the Latin texts in an attempt to shore up their doctrine of the Trinity, as it doesn’t appear in any of the earlier or non-Latin texts:
>The comma is mainly only attested in the Latin manuscripts of the New Testament, being absent from the vast majority of Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, the earliest Greek manuscript being 14th century.[6] It is also totally absent in the Geʽez, Aramaic, Syriac, Georgian, Arabic and from the early pre-12th century Armenian[7] witnesses to the New Testament. Despite its absence from these manuscripts, it was contained in many printed editions of the New Testament in the past, including the Complutensian Polyglot (1517ad), the different editions of the Textus Receptus (1516-1894ad), the London Polyglot (1655)[6] and the Patriarchal text (1904ad).[8] And it is contained in many Reformation-era vernacular translations of the Bible due to the inclusion of the verse within the Textus Receptus.
The verse you mention, in Acts, is briefly mentioned at the bottom of the page:
>The Comma Johanneum is among the most noteworthy variants found within the Textus Receptus in addition to the confession of the Ethiopian eunuch, the long ending of Mark, the Pericope Adulterae, the reading "God" in 1 Timothy 3:16 and the "Book of Life" in Revelation 22:19.[9]
P.S.: plz kill https://communities.win/c/Gaming/p/19A0yChWaK/who-wants-to-kill-this-sinister-/c
It’s interesting, but doesn’t “the Spirit, and the Water, and the Blood, and these three agree in one” fit the same bill? The Holy Spirit, the Blood of Christ, and the Water of God? If not, are you claiming trinitarianism is a transposition of the Spirit from *solely* “inside” Jesus to being “outside” Him?
Further, how can antitrinitarians reconcile “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” with “And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him.”? *Unquestioned* verses of the Bible distinctly say that the Father, the Son (word) and the Spirit are all distinct while remaining connected.
Also, personal thoughts on the Filioque? I like to hear everyone’s.
>P.S.: plz kill
Ah, thanks. Done and done. I figure it must be a paid campaign. Not even the most damaged autist would maintain *literally hundreds* of account logins for two years or more just to come back and spam again.
I’ve definitely drifted closer to mainstream Christianity in the last handful of years. There’s a lot to learn about. But I wouldnt say I’ve come any closer to the idea which I find to be the crux of things, this *transactional*, *mathematical* notion that Jesus came about and died gruesomely as some kind of…down-payment on my entry to Heaven, which is to be administered by a bunch of wretched pedophiles and land barons… there ***has to be*** more to it than that.
Sorry for the ramble. First time in a few days I’ve gotten a chance to enjoy some dankmas goodies so instead of the usual flow of consciousness it’s more a flood (or a barf lol). So I'll just cut myself off there but would love to talk more about this, maybe in the morning with fresh eyes, maybe I’ll have something approaching an answer to some of your good questions.
Merry Christmas buddy
And yeah, honestly wouldn’t surprise me to learn the “jeet” was part of the original insurgency epidemic. Like a side character who got spun off lmao