I just realized that the executed CEO was just an asshole scamming his clients. Bill Gates is literally a mass murderer who is trying to genocide people with viruses, vaxxes, and by boycotting healthy food. Bill Gates also likes to eat fast food alone for some reason.
If I could choose, I would off Bill Gates over any average asshole.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
BringTheCat789 on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
I've always pondered why political assassination attempts are exceptionally rare in modern times.
We know there are millions of people who blame all of their problems on a handful of politicians, or sometimes on just a single one. And we know there are millions of people who have given up on their life and are willing to kill, and even go as far as to kill *someone* over their problems. But, somehow, there is rarely any overlap between these groups.
It just doesn't make much sense. Obviously the highest level of people in power have constant security, but even this is simply not impervious. They're still living human lives, guarded by humans. And the people just beneath the highest level often have maybe a single body guard, often times nothing. How much security do you think the governor of your state has?
Because people fear and believe it is one way ticket.
Certainly individual terror whose purpose is just to kill somebody changes nothing. You can kill 1 CEO or manager, you get some on his/her place.
Using terror as a weapon of psychological warfare can be better in theory - but in practice mostly it causes normies to despise particular idea, especially if your enemy would blame you of targetting normie Joe and Jane Doe. So even if you are freedom fighter called terrorist by them you risk that even if you are not harming poor Joe and Jane - they will do it instead of you and blame you.
Look at arabs. Definitely most of them are freedom fighters believing in getting rid of the western influence and jews (but also some are really radical islamist expansionists too) because they would live according to their holy book - and is quran retarded and evil or not ( XD ) it is another story. Thing is by indiscriminate targetting and doing terror attacks they made their position worse than if they would simply do nothing and would be waiting like lambs for the slaughter. As it would take more time and effort to "justify" killing them and their families by jews and their "american" footstools
We know there are millions of people who blame all of their problems on a handful of politicians, or sometimes on just a single one. And we know there are millions of people who have given up on their life and are willing to kill, and even go as far as to kill *someone* over their problems. But, somehow, there is rarely any overlap between these groups.
It just doesn't make much sense. Obviously the highest level of people in power have constant security, but even this is simply not impervious. They're still living human lives, guarded by humans. And the people just beneath the highest level often have maybe a single body guard, often times nothing. How much security do you think the governor of your state has?
Certainly individual terror whose purpose is just to kill somebody changes nothing. You can kill 1 CEO or manager, you get some on his/her place.
Using terror as a weapon of psychological warfare can be better in theory - but in practice mostly it causes normies to despise particular idea, especially if your enemy would blame you of targetting normie Joe and Jane Doe. So even if you are freedom fighter called terrorist by them you risk that even if you are not harming poor Joe and Jane - they will do it instead of you and blame you.
Look at arabs. Definitely most of them are freedom fighters believing in getting rid of the western influence and jews (but also some are really radical islamist expansionists too) because they would live according to their holy book - and is quran retarded and evil or not ( XD ) it is another story. Thing is by indiscriminate targetting and doing terror attacks they made their position worse than if they would simply do nothing and would be waiting like lambs for the slaughter. As it would take more time and effort to "justify" killing them and their families by jews and their "american" footstools