Consume Product

Fascism was merely what happened when a bunch of Leftist socialists like Deat and outright Marxists like Doriot realized that they were *wrong* about some things and made common cause with a bunch of Rightists over them. That's all there is to it: a synthesis between disaffected Leftists, including Mussolini, with Rightists. There is nothing 'Far-Right' about Fascism.

Fascism will never return for a wide range of reasons. The first that comes to mind is that today's Leftists are far too extreme and self-assured to ever realize that they're wrong about much of anything. The moment that one of them even begins to express doubts, the others turn on him and declare him 'Far-Right' and every other pejorative label under the sun. Look at today's pathetic excuse for America's Right-Wing. Notice that it is simply dominated by 'former' Leftists or centrists—Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk, Donald Trump, key examples of high profile 'Rightists' who were Democrats—and that it glorifies historical Leftists like Martin Luther King? Why is that the case? It is because every time someone begins to doubt, they excommunicate him from their ranks, and he is forced over to the Right-Wing. The Right-Wing, being absolutely hopeless and useless, adores these 'converts', clinging to them like lifelines, because they believe that the 'converts' will lead them to power. And in Trump's case, he did, only to bring about a government that was practically *horrendous* to anyone that is actually Far-Right. (Decriminalized homosexuality in Botswana? Jerusalem recognized as the capital of Israel? The Platinum Plan?)

The second major point is that the Leftists of the time were still essentially non-degenerate White men. In that regard, they shared far more commonality with today's (actual) Far-Right than they do with today's Left. The Overton Window was far narrower in their time: even the fringe Left were cisheteronormative and so forth. It was simply easier to switch from the Left to the Right. Nowadays, it's very difficult: for instance, if you're a Leftist because of degenerative reasons such as that they're 'better for trans rights', you've probably been convinced that you *have* to be a Leftist because Rightism poses an existential threat to your self-preservation. People have too many vested interests in being Leftist to switch sides—it's almost like they are two different races or species locked in perpetual war these days. Normal people and a smaller number of degenerates are on the Right, the greater number of degenerates are on the Left slowly but surely ensure that it will be *impossible* to be Left-Wing while normal. For how could you be? The simple fact of being heterosexual makes you closed-minded and homophobic, the simple fact of being cisgendered makes you closed-minded and transphobic. If you were truly open-minded, you would already be 'on the spectrum'. You would be open to becoming trans; you would be open to queerness. Thus we arrive at the strange conclusion that 'Fascist' has come to be synonymous not even merely with 'Right-Wing', but with 'normal person'. The degenerate is the only true anti-fascist.

As for the second comment, it's too moronic. A few points: Firstly, he isn't calling for 'imposing mass starvation' on anyone: that's simply an unjustified logical leap of the kind of hysterical Leftists make every day about Donald Trump. 'Some Mexicans are rapists, he said; ergo, Trump really means that all Mexicans are rapists; ergo, Trump really wants to exterminate all Mexicans.' He's simply saying that it isn't incumbent on anyone to feed infinity Africans. Secondly, you don't speak for 'normal people', that declining proportion of the population who are almost entirely 'Right wingers' today. Third, thanks for admitting that actual Rightists control nothing of any real significance in today's world.

I don't know or care who that Twitter account is, but it reminds me that Christianity is one sick joke that becomes more and more perverse, twisted, and comically evil over time. Imagine the crusaders or Templars looking at the world today. You look at White Christians: they are all singing songs while clapping their hands in between donating money to starving Africans. 'Jesus iz lawd! Donate mo' money to Africa... that's what Jesus would do! Jesus was the world's first revolutionary socialist!'

You then look at non-white Christians to see if they're doing any better: they're performing animal sacrifices in between worshipping 'narcosaints', like Pablo Escobar, and the dead, like Santa Muerte.

The Whites pray to someone who they envisage was a black or brown queer hyper-liberal proto-Marxist who preached unconditional tolerance of all things except intolerance; the non-whites pray to dead drug lords and bones. Do not they realize that all of these false idols that they have erected have no power to answer their prayers?

Do they really believe that God took the form of some degenerate hippy queer who went around chanting 'peace and love, dude' while high on drugs? That this make-believe degenerate can confer any benefits on the living, when their drug-addled 'hippy Jesus', had he existed, will clearly be cast into Hell as an obvious false prophet?