The more I see Leftists react to Israels shit and be labeled a Nazi, the more I am convinced they will turn over to it rather than run from it like many on the Right. Thoughts?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
Kind of makes sense, after all, look at the left and remove the ((((woke))) component. There's a lot of compatibility. When NSDAP won the German election back in 1933 the people had three choices, Sozis (Wiemars woke and degenerate "social democratic" party that caused all the misery as well as two hyper inflation events). The communist party, which wanted Germany to become part of the Soviet union and NSDAP, the national socialist party.
All three choices had some type of socialism for economic system. The choice therefore became fully ideological. Do you want degeneracy (the devil you know), communist misery (the unknown devil) or nationalism (the final solution).
The left is more collectivist by design, which is necessary for racial unity. Hitler talks a lot about this in his speeches. Help your fellow countrymen, once everyone has that mindset it works. But as soon as you introduce individualism or worse, (((parasites))), everything turns to shit.
The Amish is another good example, they don't hate technology, only (((dependency))). The Amish communities are more collectivist than individualist too. Similar to traditional leftism, but somehow cuckservatives seems to think that the Amish are individualist. This is what (((subversion))) does to the brain.
This is also why (((they))) label national socialism as "far right" when talking to people on the left. Kikes know they're able to notice relatively fast as soon as they break out of their programming.
The lefts progressiveness can also work against the jew, when not used for (((subversion))), the left is quick to try something new when they recognize that something doesn't work.
Conservatives were collective as well. Now its a battle between individualized industrialized man and tribal collective. My bet is on the tribal collective winning.
Were and should still be. By definition I wouldn't call cuckservative MiGA tards real conservatives, because all they do is the same shit the progressive woke left does, just slower and legally.
Their talking points is like if they came straight out of a 1950's propaganda film, but somehow they only conserved the bad stuff from the 50's. Degeneracy and whatever consoomer goods the jew tells them to buy into.
They lack the racism of the 50's as well as the traditional values. And frankly it would be more reasonable to go further back than the 50's to find good values to conserve. To a time before the (((federal reserve))) and expensive machines we depend on but can't repair using basic tools.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Long time ago, still valid tho. But the more modern version from what I've heard is the French parliament, were conservatives sat to the right and progressives to the left.
Today right or left has lost it's meaning altogether, neither means what it used too. We don't even have the original ideologies anymore, it's red jew or blue jew. Europe also has green jew and yellow jew, but that's a story for another day.
> Those who thought the king should have an absolute veto sat on the right of the president of the assembly, and those who thought he should not — the more radical view — sat on the left of the president of the assembly. In other words, those who wanted to hew closer to tradition were on the right, and those who wanted more change were on the left.
But they fail to mention the Hand of GOD as part of their explanation is to where the sides came from.
All three choices had some type of socialism for economic system. The choice therefore became fully ideological. Do you want degeneracy (the devil you know), communist misery (the unknown devil) or nationalism (the final solution).
The left is more collectivist by design, which is necessary for racial unity. Hitler talks a lot about this in his speeches. Help your fellow countrymen, once everyone has that mindset it works. But as soon as you introduce individualism or worse, (((parasites))), everything turns to shit.
The Amish is another good example, they don't hate technology, only (((dependency))). The Amish communities are more collectivist than individualist too. Similar to traditional leftism, but somehow cuckservatives seems to think that the Amish are individualist. This is what (((subversion))) does to the brain.
This is also why (((they))) label national socialism as "far right" when talking to people on the left. Kikes know they're able to notice relatively fast as soon as they break out of their programming.
The lefts progressiveness can also work against the jew, when not used for (((subversion))), the left is quick to try something new when they recognize that something doesn't work.
Their talking points is like if they came straight out of a 1950's propaganda film, but somehow they only conserved the bad stuff from the 50's. Degeneracy and whatever consoomer goods the jew tells them to buy into.
They lack the racism of the 50's as well as the traditional values. And frankly it would be more reasonable to go further back than the 50's to find good values to conserve. To a time before the (((federal reserve))) and expensive machines we depend on but can't repair using basic tools.
Today right or left has lost it's meaning altogether, neither means what it used too. We don't even have the original ideologies anymore, it's red jew or blue jew. Europe also has green jew and yellow jew, but that's a story for another day.
Time magazine explains it as
> Those who thought the king should have an absolute veto sat on the right of the president of the assembly, and those who thought he should not — the more radical view — sat on the left of the president of the assembly. In other words, those who wanted to hew closer to tradition were on the right, and those who wanted more change were on the left.
But they fail to mention the Hand of GOD as part of their explanation is to where the sides came from.