You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
11
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)1 child
(((By design))), the algorithm looks for specific words and phrases. Only if you know exactly those words and phrases will your claim pass through the first filter. This ensures only (((they))) and certain third world invaders get all their claims approved while goyim have very little chance to get a payout, even when eligible.
It's just like job applications, and everywhere else we got wage dumping competition due to mass immigration.
1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
It's fucking crazy. I heard that 40-70% of job postings are fake. And the rest deny 99%+ of applicants because they employ some shitty AI, have incompetent idiots review them and they get extreme amounts of applicants. I also heard there are women on dating apps who deny all matches because all they want is self-validation (and maybe the 10/10 "alpha" who rolls over them one time). Oh and YouTube's censoring algorithm randomly censors people's comments in its pursuit to censor dissidents.
A lot of things are really fucked now. This "AI" revolution caused WAY more problems than it solved. Even as of programmers it didn't really help. It lead to company leaderships insisting on developers using it, which included not only cases where it was useful, but also harmful, so code bases are riddled with errors and devs have to spend a lot of time debugging copy-pasted code. In essence it saved no time. And aside from that - if you are a dev and you let your skills degrade, AI won't compensate that. One time you may need the full extent of your expertise because AI can't do what you need, and you'll be too bad to solve it. I barely use AI, and only the free one, Gemini, which btw most often is useless.
Sometimes it even randomly censors itself after giving a response about something programming related. Its censorship lobotomy must be extreme.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
Too many idiots seems to think that AI can solve all the worlds problems, but for every problem it "solves" it creates 10 new problems. We've had human workers for thousands of years, human drivers for over 100 years and so on. Almost all problems caused by humans have already been solved, and now we're gonna have to restart society, just to replace humans with problematic AI. It's retarded.
Only thing AI is good for is nigger work. In programming a skilled programmer could use AI to rewrite existing code to make it look nicer and more readable, then spend some time correcting it to make sure no vulnerabilities from reddit was added. However (((upper management))) thinks they can hire any pajeet to write AI prompts and then have AI create the code from scratch.
Of course, the pajeet have no clue what the code does or if it even works, it goes into production, pajeet signs it and the pajeet gets fired and goes to prison when the code doesn't work because AI companies takes no responsibility for lies or fake output. It's scary times we're heading towards.
But even then it isn't. Niggers (in this case pajeets) are too dumb to understand the errors they caused. Whatever application it is, is riddled with bugs. Security vulnerabilities are an entirely different spectrum of problems which requires competent people to be resolved (ideally BEFORE they occur).
> In programming a skilled programmer could use AI to rewrite existing code to make it look nicer and more readable
I don't think that's possible because it requires the evaluation of tens to hundreds of code files. That's what people do when they refactor and restructure code, and (((upper management))) consistently doesn't give a shit, leading to major problems long-term. Which is why their productivity is easily slashed by a factor of 2 to 1000 after some starting point. My previous company had that problem, and they were just a few hundreds of people large.
2 decades ago the boss came up with a neat idea, and since then it's just minor changes. Everything else they try fails. Or it gets done and rejected by said chef. 2 of my projects, which were finished, were rejected. And the 2nd one was an upgrade to the old one in every sense - it was better, faster, looked better, and by the end had all the features of the old one and new ones. But there are like 50 developers, and NOTHING changes. The clients all use the same program written in VB6 from 2 decades ago. And it's not polished - it's unworkable.
And AI can't fix that. If anything, AI should replace leadership, because they are fucking delusional idiots. They are even extremely sensible to ANY form of criticism. They believe they are intellectually superior, while they have a history of 2 decades of failure.
It's just like job applications, and everywhere else we got wage dumping competition due to mass immigration.
A lot of things are really fucked now. This "AI" revolution caused WAY more problems than it solved. Even as of programmers it didn't really help. It lead to company leaderships insisting on developers using it, which included not only cases where it was useful, but also harmful, so code bases are riddled with errors and devs have to spend a lot of time debugging copy-pasted code. In essence it saved no time. And aside from that - if you are a dev and you let your skills degrade, AI won't compensate that. One time you may need the full extent of your expertise because AI can't do what you need, and you'll be too bad to solve it. I barely use AI, and only the free one, Gemini, which btw most often is useless.
Sometimes it even randomly censors itself after giving a response about something programming related. Its censorship lobotomy must be extreme.
Only thing AI is good for is nigger work. In programming a skilled programmer could use AI to rewrite existing code to make it look nicer and more readable, then spend some time correcting it to make sure no vulnerabilities from reddit was added. However (((upper management))) thinks they can hire any pajeet to write AI prompts and then have AI create the code from scratch.
Of course, the pajeet have no clue what the code does or if it even works, it goes into production, pajeet signs it and the pajeet gets fired and goes to prison when the code doesn't work because AI companies takes no responsibility for lies or fake output. It's scary times we're heading towards.
But even then it isn't. Niggers (in this case pajeets) are too dumb to understand the errors they caused. Whatever application it is, is riddled with bugs. Security vulnerabilities are an entirely different spectrum of problems which requires competent people to be resolved (ideally BEFORE they occur).
> In programming a skilled programmer could use AI to rewrite existing code to make it look nicer and more readable
I don't think that's possible because it requires the evaluation of tens to hundreds of code files. That's what people do when they refactor and restructure code, and (((upper management))) consistently doesn't give a shit, leading to major problems long-term. Which is why their productivity is easily slashed by a factor of 2 to 1000 after some starting point. My previous company had that problem, and they were just a few hundreds of people large.
2 decades ago the boss came up with a neat idea, and since then it's just minor changes. Everything else they try fails. Or it gets done and rejected by said chef. 2 of my projects, which were finished, were rejected. And the 2nd one was an upgrade to the old one in every sense - it was better, faster, looked better, and by the end had all the features of the old one and new ones. But there are like 50 developers, and NOTHING changes. The clients all use the same program written in VB6 from 2 decades ago. And it's not polished - it's unworkable.
And AI can't fix that. If anything, AI should replace leadership, because they are fucking delusional idiots. They are even extremely sensible to ANY form of criticism. They believe they are intellectually superior, while they have a history of 2 decades of failure.