You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> Only thing AI is good for is nigger work.
But even then it isn't. Niggers (in this case pajeets) are too dumb to understand the errors they caused. Whatever application it is, is riddled with bugs. Security vulnerabilities are an entirely different spectrum of problems which requires competent people to be resolved (ideally BEFORE they occur).
> In programming a skilled programmer could use AI to rewrite existing code to make it look nicer and more readable
I don't think that's possible because it requires the evaluation of tens to hundreds of code files. That's what people do when they refactor and restructure code, and (((upper management))) consistently doesn't give a shit, leading to major problems long-term. Which is why their productivity is easily slashed by a factor of 2 to 1000 after some starting point. My previous company had that problem, and they were just a few hundreds of people large.
2 decades ago the boss came up with a neat idea, and since then it's just minor changes. Everything else they try fails. Or it gets done and rejected by said chef. 2 of my projects, which were finished, were rejected. And the 2nd one was an upgrade to the old one in every sense - it was better, faster, looked better, and by the end had all the features of the old one and new ones. But there are like 50 developers, and NOTHING changes. The clients all use the same program written in VB6 from 2 decades ago. And it's not polished - it's unworkable.
And AI can't fix that. If anything, AI should replace leadership, because they are fucking delusional idiots. They are even extremely sensible to ANY form of criticism. They believe they are intellectually superior, while they have a history of 2 decades of failure.
But even then it isn't. Niggers (in this case pajeets) are too dumb to understand the errors they caused. Whatever application it is, is riddled with bugs. Security vulnerabilities are an entirely different spectrum of problems which requires competent people to be resolved (ideally BEFORE they occur).
> In programming a skilled programmer could use AI to rewrite existing code to make it look nicer and more readable
I don't think that's possible because it requires the evaluation of tens to hundreds of code files. That's what people do when they refactor and restructure code, and (((upper management))) consistently doesn't give a shit, leading to major problems long-term. Which is why their productivity is easily slashed by a factor of 2 to 1000 after some starting point. My previous company had that problem, and they were just a few hundreds of people large.
2 decades ago the boss came up with a neat idea, and since then it's just minor changes. Everything else they try fails. Or it gets done and rejected by said chef. 2 of my projects, which were finished, were rejected. And the 2nd one was an upgrade to the old one in every sense - it was better, faster, looked better, and by the end had all the features of the old one and new ones. But there are like 50 developers, and NOTHING changes. The clients all use the same program written in VB6 from 2 decades ago. And it's not polished - it's unworkable.
And AI can't fix that. If anything, AI should replace leadership, because they are fucking delusional idiots. They are even extremely sensible to ANY form of criticism. They believe they are intellectually superior, while they have a history of 2 decades of failure.