New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Anti-semitism in US was legal and very strong. Anti-Jew propaganda was everywhere. Ford was one of the most powerful people in US, and he was anti-Jew. Now everything just disappeared. Suddenly Jews control everything.

If anti-Jew Americans were so powerful, why they allowed Jews to take control over US so easily? Why none of the Jewish elite were killed?
You must log in or sign up to comment
19 comments:
21
Byzantine_Shill on scored.co
1 year ago 21 points (+0 / -0 / +21Score on mirror ) 4 children
To put it simple, tolerance opened the gates to subversive elements. Look at how conservatives treat the troon and sodomite degeneracy today. They appear to be against the degenerates but in reality they tolerate it while not embracing it themselves. That’s the difference between Hitler and America.

The Church and Hitler didn’t tolerate degeneracy while America tolerated it. Once you tolerate a subversive element it will use that tolerance to push the boundary further and further until it has completely taken over society.

The Jews took over America because secret societies and Jews were tolerated. They may have been shunned but they were still permitted to exist.
11
ApexVeritas on scored.co
1 year ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
This is my view on the subject as well, at least the underlying and unwritten part of your comment.


Subversion, infiltration, and take over isn't done in one big step. It's done incrementally, in small steps over time. Jews gain power, historically, through banking institutions and controlling the money. This indebts them to very powerful people at the upper echelons of society. This enables jews to control those people and the upper echelons of society, so they can steer policy and decisions, and to infiltrate those positions and institutions through their undue influence. Once those institutions are captured, they push outward and infiltrate, subvert, and control more institutions. Through this method of incrementalism, they now control almost every aspect of Western civilization. Many people don't realize it because of the massive amount of propaganda and control/weakening mechanisms arrayed against us.


White people build naturally high functioning high trust societies. We don't act in the way jews do, so we're not immediately cognizant of their destructive behaviors, idea, and lies. Their behavior is anathema to the health, longevity, success, or righteousness of any group their inhabit, so it's difficult for decent people to predict for it, spot it, and root it out. Don't forget that much of what jews offer, at face value, seems beneficial in some way. We can see this immediately with people's current views on usury. Usury isn't just high interest loans, it's loans with any interest. The current logic is "why would anyone loan out money without interest, some benefit to the loaner?" This, at face value, makes sense. However, as we plainly see, usury has deep problems that are philosophically and historically too dangerous to employ. It creates wealth from nothing, which is the enemy of productivity. It concentrates wealth in the hands of the lenders, the bankers, the people that control the money. It forces people into a never ending death spiral of pursuit of money (i.e. mammonism), which is exactly what the West is currently experiencing, from top to bottom. And even though the poisonous fruits of usury, and those that employ it, are becoming plainly apparent, right wing normies, even Christians, defend usury because of the surface level reasoning, and the propaganda acts as a deterrent for people waking up to the truth.


Don't forget, too, that jews shapeshift. They always give themselves away, if you know what to look for, but they try to blend in with their host group, to better subvert it. This is why they always use arguments like "fellow _____, we must _____, or we won't survive" when they're in the small minority, or have little power at the beginning stages of infiltration and subversion. But, when they gain undue power over a group, they speak and act more brazenly, openly bragging about their subversion, lies, murder, and destruction. Liars manipulate people. Jews are skilled liars and word smiths, enabling them to bullshit their way out of tough spots, to twist meanings, and to manipulate people. And on top of this, they're nepotistic, so their lying serves their in group, while destroying their host.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
America and Britain didnt just tolerate secret societies, they openly embraced them. There was a point where a third of american men were some for of mason, ironically European immigration dealt a serious blow to masonry as more Catholics entered the country to oppose it. I'm quite certain a lot of Anti-Catholic sentiment in the US was the result of the masons being afraid of being exposed rather than a legitimate nationalistic attachment to any particular Christian creed. (In fact, the first amendment prohibits an official creed from being established in the US, and was likely a poison pill from the masonic members of the founding father to ensure america would eventually be de-Christianized).
wristaction on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The old "you can't fight something with nothing" axiom holds true.
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
they and their secret societies were not tolerated. not at all. the British and the City of London financiers waged war on us for 100 years and more before they were able to infintrate and poison USA Christian patriots.
13
wristaction on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 2 children
1. The jewish elites you see in history - the ones who appear as if their removal would undo postwar jewish dominance - were just the jews who did the thing. They act solidaristically and decentralized. Get into a time machine and kill Jacob Schiff: some other big money jew would be in your book as the Wall Street jew who financed the Bolsheviks.

2. Whites were susseptable long before jews kicked it into gear. What you're looking back on is an unregulated social space where antisemitism wasn't prohibited. Not a social space where antisemitism was a significant driver of public sentiment. The fact that Ford and Coughlin were taken down - at enormous effort - shows that antisemitism was not popular among white elites. Indeed, British Zionism was more influential than antisemitism.
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
key insight in your post: British zionism. we faught this battle since our nations's founding. we did kill them. we did supress them and bar their entry to our nation. we started losing ground sometime around the early 1900s and by WWII we were well and truly fucked.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
There wasnt much fighting back, the poison was there from the start in the form of Masonry and Puritanism, both of which were natural vectors for zionism, Masonry because they Gnostic Occultists like the actual jews and Puritanism because its a judaized religion that quickly devoled into complete jew-worship, which made it easy for the synnagogue of Satan to trick americans into believing they were actual Hebrews.
kd5ywa on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
You don't endanger elite's piggy bank expanding methods. White or otherwise. You'll be taken out in some shape or form.
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
Guess who gave loans to George Washington
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
Because the US has been infested with (((Freemasons))) from the start. There was a point where like 30% of the male population, even the nogs, were (((masons))).
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
anti-mason movement in NY is some interesting history. actual assassinations going down on the streets.
el_hoovy on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
"early anti-semitism" kept Whites more or less safe from jews for about 1800 years. it took the industrial revolution coinciding with a period in time where they weren't expelled from new major industrial centers to get us to where we are today, where they took over a lot of the production via aggressive psychopathy and have a stranglehold on global goings-on. had this massive increase in available power happened in 1290 England chances are we'd be in a different state, but who really knows.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
It was also preceded the Judaization of Christianity in the anglosphere by the middle Protestant and later Puritan movements that essentially neutralized Christian resistance to jewish power.
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Just like Hitler, they all underestimated how evil and degenerate kikes can be. (((Capitalism))) makes the takeover slow and legal so that nobody notices or protests. (((Communism))) on the other hand means that the jew take over control through violence.
Conspirologist on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yes, this make sense. In Europe, White people were enslaving their own kind, so the Jews had no problem to start a revolution. In US, only niggers were slaves, so they used capitalism to take over.
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
WeimerSolutions on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It was zog controlled from the start. Sorry to break your american pride. America was a NWO plan since 1776 and exists to destroy empires and monarchies (which is what noth world wars were, the world's last empire ended when usa bombed Nagasaki) to be replaced with democratic republics of ZOG. Henry Ford is responsible, despite any truths he mayve written, he converted ford into a military industry amd the war for zog wouldn't have been won without his contributions.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I wouldnt say Ford was responsible, but he was unwittingly complicit due to blind patriotism (in reality statism, because america hasnt been an actual nation since 1913).
Toast message